Search Results

As the college football season progresses, the latest 2025 NFL Draft Top 50 Big Board   update reflects significant shifts at several positions. This analysis highlights the biggest risers, fallers, and new entrants into the rankings, offering a snapshot of how this year’s draft class is evolving. Speaking of how this class is evolving, the 2025 NFL Draft will be a far more defense-heavy draft class. Our current top 10 rankings include six defenders plus Travis Hunter. Depending on what position you believe Travis Hunter should play in the NFL (cough cough, he should play DB), he could be the seventh defender listed in the top 10 of our current NFL Draft big board rankings. Biggest Risers The following players have seen the most significant jumps in the rankings, cementing themselves as premier NFL Draft prospects: Travis Hunter (ATH, Colorado) – From 2 to 1 Ashton Jeanty (RB, Boise State) – From 16 to 4 (Jeanty is a can't miss prospect) Jalon Walker (LB, Georgia) – From Unranked to 10 (Walker's athleticism and versatility is elite) Will Campbell (OT, LSU) – From 6 to 9 Shavon Revel (CB, ECU) – From Unranked to 13 (Tore his ACL, but after watching his tape, he is one of the top DBs in this cycle). Cam Ward (QB, Miami) – From 34 to 23 Ashton Gillotte (EDGE, Louisville) – From Unranked to 41 Garrett Nussmeier (QB, LSU) – From Unranked to 42 Walter Nolen (IDL, Ole Miss) – From Unranked to 44 Biggest Fallers While still talented prospects, the following players have dropped in the rankings, with some falling out of the Top 50 entirely: Noah Fifita (QB, Arizona) – From 36 to Unranked Quinshon Judkins (RB, Ole Miss) – From 44 to Unranked (Fell out because of higher priority positions gaining steam) Xavier Nwankpa (S, Iowa) – From 47 to Unranked Danny Stutsman (LB, Oklahoma) – From 48 to Unranked TreVeyon Henderson (RB, Ohio State) – From 43 to Unranked (Fell out because of higher priority positions gaining steam) Jaishawn Barham (LB, Michigan) – From 50 to Unranked New Entrants The following players have broken into the Top 50 rankings with standout performances this season: Jalon Walker (LB, Georgia) – Now ranked 10 Shavon Revel (CB, ECU) – Now ranked 13 Ashton Gillotte (EDGE, Louisville) – Now ranked 41 Garrett Nussmeier (QB, LSU) – Now ranked 42 (He could elevate to QB1, but I am still on the fence. He shows some elite traits, but there are lapses in consistency and decision-making.). Walter Nolen (IDL, Ole Miss) – Now ranked 44 Position Analysis: Top 50 Breakdown Position Sept Nov Change QB 8 6 -2 ATH 0 1 +1 RB 4 1 -3 WR 7 6 -1 TE 1 3 +2 OT 7 7 0 IDL 6 7 +1 EDGE 8 12 +4 LB 2 1 -1 CB 5 4 -1 S 2 2 0 Key Observations Rising Positional Value : Linebackers and tight ends have seen significant gains, driven by versatile players like Jalon Walker (10) and Colston Loveland (14). Depth at Premium Positions : Offensive tackle and edge defender remain strong, with multiple new additions to the rankings. Quarterbacks Hold Steady : The QB group continues to show depth, with players like Cam Ward (23) and Garrett Nussmeier (42) solidifying their status. 2025 NFL Draft: Top 50 Big Board Rankings 1). Travis Hunter (ATH, Colorado) Travis Hunter’s unique two-way skill set as a cornerback and wide receiver makes him one of the most versatile prospects in recent history. As a CB, Hunter has elite-level anticipation and ball skills that enable him to challenge WR1s effectively, especially in zone schemes where he can read and react. While his thin frame (185 lbs) impacts his physicality in press coverage, his recovery speed (reported 4.4 forty-yard dash) and route recognition help mitigate these issues. At WR, Hunter’s burst, elite ball tracking, and run-after-catch ability make him an explosive threat downfield. His dynamic playstyle suits a team open to leveraging him in specific, high-impact roles on both sides of the ball, potentially similar to Deion Sanders. 2). Will Johnson (CB, Michigan) Will Johnson presents a dynamic blend of size, speed, and physicality that profiles him as a future No. 1 NFL cornerback. With elite-level coverage instincts, Johnson excels in both man and zone schemes, showing impressive route recognition and anticipation skills. His long frame (6’2”) and fluidity enable him to contest larger receivers effectively, while his quick-twitch athleticism supports top-level man coverage against speedier opponents. In run defense, Johnson is a willing and physical tackler, making him valuable in schemes demanding versatility and physicality. Projected as a shutdown corner capable of elevating an NFL secondary, Johnson’s skill set should allow for immediate impact and the potential for Pro Bowl-level contributions. 3). Mason Graham (IDL, Michigan) Graham is a physical force on the interior defensive line, showcasing an exceptional blend of size, strength, and explosiveness that elevates him as a high-impact IDL prospect. He excels as a run-stopper with natural leverage, dominating gaps and setting a reliable anchor against double-teams. Graham’s hand usage, developed pass-rush moves, and lateral quickness allow him to consistently pressure the pocket. Best suited to play as a 1-tech or 3-tech in a four-man front, Graham could also perform in hybrid fronts as a versatile gap-control defender. His skill set projects as an immediate starter with potential for Pro Bowl contributions in the right defensive scheme. 4). Ashton Jeanty (RB, Boise State) Jeanty’s combination of agility, vision, and compact power makes him a versatile offensive weapon, ideally suited for zone-blocking schemes, particularly those utilizing outside zone and pin/pull concepts. His ability to find lanes and cut back effectively showcases his fit in these systems. In the passing game, his dual-threat capability allows for deployment as a safety valve with dynamic after the catch ability. 5). Tetairoa McMillan (WR, Arizona) McMillan is an enticing WR prospect who blends exceptional size and body control with the versatility to align at X, Z, or in the slot. At 6'5", McMillan combines a wide catch radius with a natural feel for leveraging his frame against defenders. While his speed is not elite, his smooth acceleration and hip fluidity enable him to separate and create mismatches. He is a strong fit for a vertically-oriented offensive scheme that can take full advantage of his downfield contested catch ability. 6). Mykel Williams (EDGE, Georgia) Williams is an alignment-versatile edge rusher who has all the physical tools to develop into a premier player in the NFL. His ability to play various positions along the defensive front makes him a valuable asset in multiple schemes. Williams has been utilized as a stand-up edge rusher, head-up over the center in a 0-tech, and in other roles within Georgia’s complex defensive scheme. His best fit in the NFL would be as a 4-3 defensive end or a 3-4 outside linebacker, where his athleticism and versatility can be maximized. 7). Abdul Carter (EDGE, Penn State) Carter's primary role at Penn State has been as a box linebacker, where he excels due to his remarkable physicality and agility. His quickness allows him to close space sideline to sideline effectively, making him a formidable force against the run. In 2023, Carter consistently aligned as an inside linebacker but also took over 100 snaps on the edge of the defense. These snaps included roles as a pass rusher and in coverage scenarios, demonstrating his versatility. 8). Malaki Starks (S, Georgia) Starks exhibits a balanced skill set that suits both man and zone coverage, making him versatile as a safety. His ability to read the quarterback and diagnose plays quickly is notable. Starks has shown effectiveness in slot/nickel situations, suggesting he could fit well in schemes that value multidimensional defensive backs who can cover, tackle, and play the ball. His experience and growing knowledge of defensive schemes, coupled with physical and mental development, indicate a strong adaptability to various defensive schemes at the NFL level. 9). Will Campbell (OT, LSU) Campbell is an athletic and powerful tackle prospect with strong positional versatility, having excelled at left tackle for LSU but projecting effectively to guard or center due to his skill set. His excellent balance, anchor strength, and quick hands make him reliable in both run and pass protection. In the NFL, Campbell may be best suited on the interior to maximize his strengths, where his power and efficient technique can shine against interior defenders. Ideal for both zone and power schemes, Campbell offers immediate impact with the potential for Pro Bowl-level performance as a guard or tackle. 10). Jalon Walker (LB, Georgia) Walker is a highly versatile and explosive linebacker with natural pass-rush instincts and an ideal athletic profile for hybrid roles. He projects as a disruptive weapon on early downs as a run defender and as an edge rusher on passing downs. His ideal fit is in a system that maximizes linebacker versatility, with the flexibility to use him both in pass rush and coverage assignments. Although he lacks extensive off-ball linebacker experience, his range, burst, and strength make him an immediate contributor with Pro Bowl potential in the right scheme. 11). Kelvin Banks (OT, Texas) Banks is a smooth, refined tackle with elite footwork and technique, excelling in pass protection. His lateral agility and strength make him equally effective in run blocking, fitting well in both zone and power schemes. 12). Nic Scourton (EDGE, Texas A&M) Scourton is a powerful edge rusher with quick hands and impressive strength, excelling in collapsing pockets. His ability to rotate inside on passing downs adds versatility for hybrid defensive fronts. 13). Shavon Revel (CB, ECU) Revel is a press-man corner with elite length, physicality, and fluid movement skills. He thrives in contested catch situations and is a disruptive presence at the line of scrimmage. 14). Colston Loveland (TE, Michigan) Loveland is a dynamic tight end with a large catch radius and strong mismatch potential. His blend of speed and size makes him a reliable weapon in both traditional and spread offensive schemes. 15). Luther Burden (WR, Missouri) Burden is an explosive slot receiver who excels in motion-based systems and yards after catch opportunities. His quickness and agility make him a dangerous playmaker in space. 16). Kenneth Grant (IDL, Michigan) Grant is a versatile interior lineman who excels at controlling gaps and disrupting the pocket. His power and lateral quickness make him an ideal fit for both 3-4 and 4-3 defensive schemes. 17). James Pearce Jr. (EDGE, Tennessee) Pearce is an agile edge rusher with exceptional first-step quickness and bend around the edge. His versatility makes him effective as both a stand-up rusher and a traditional defensive end. 18). LT Overton (EDGE, Alabama) Overton is a rising edge prospect with a strong combination of size, length, and athleticism. He can fit seamlessly into both 4-3 and 3-4 schemes as a disruptive presence on the edge. 19). Shedeur Sanders (QB, Colorado) Sanders is an accurate and poised quarterback who thrives in quick-passing systems. His pocket awareness and ability to extend plays add value to offenses emphasizing timing and rhythm. 20). Benjamin Morrison (CB, Notre Dame) Morrison is a physical cornerback who excels in press and zone coverage. His football IQ and ability to anticipate routes make him a versatile defender in any scheme. 21). Shemar Stewart (EDGE, Texas A&M) Stewart is a versatile edge defender with impressive power and quickness. He excels at setting the edge in the run game and providing consistent pressure as a pass rusher. 22). Derrick Harmon (IDL, Oregon) Harmon is a strong interior lineman who excels against the run and in collapsing the pocket. His combination of power and quick hands makes him disruptive on early downs. 23). Cam Ward (QB, Miami) Ward is an adaptable quarterback with elite arm talent and mobility, thriving in vertical passing schemes. His improvisational skills and downfield accuracy make him a dangerous playmaker. 24). Tyleik Williams (IDL, Ohio State) Williams is a stout interior defender with excellent leverage and gap discipline. He thrives in two-gap systems and provides a strong anchor in run defense. 25). Deone Walker (IDL, Kentucky) Walker is a massive, versatile lineman who dominates blockers with his raw strength. His ability to disrupt plays in various alignments makes him a valuable asset in multiple schemes. 26). Denzel Burke (CB, Ohio State) Burke is a long, physical corner who excels in zone coverage and vertical routes. While not as effective in man-to-man situations, his physicality and ball skills make him a key defensive contributor. 27). Kevin Winston Jr. (S, Penn State) Winston is a rangy safety with excellent ball skills and the ability to cover ground quickly. His versatility allows him to excel in both man and zone coverage schemes. 28). Tyler Warren (TE, Penn State) Warren is a versatile tight end who thrives as a blocker and red-zone target. His ability to line up in multiple roles makes him an asset for offenses that value tight end versatility. 29). Cameron Williams (OT, Texas) Williams is a physically dominant tackle excelling in both run blocking and pass protection. His size and strength make him an ideal fit for power-based offensive schemes. 30). Howard Cross III (IDL, Notre Dame) Cross is a quick, disruptive interior lineman who excels in penetration schemes. His ability to generate backfield pressure makes him an effective weapon against the pass. 31). Elic Ayomanor (WR, Stanford) Ayomanor is a physical X-receiver with excellent contested catch ability and deep threat potential. His combination of size and athleticism makes him a reliable target in critical situations. 32). Harold Fannin Jr. (TE, Bowling Green) Fannin is a versatile tight end excelling as both a blocker and a receiving threat. His ability to create mismatches against smaller defenders adds value in modern offensive schemes. 33). Quinn Ewers (QB, Texas) Ewers is a quick-release quarterback with excellent arm strength and deep-ball accuracy. His ability to operate in spread and RPO-based systems enhances his NFL potential. 34). Isaiah Bond (WR, Texas) Bond is an explosive playmaker with elite speed and route-running ability. He thrives in vertically oriented schemes that emphasize stretching the field. 35). Jalen Milroe (QB, Alabama) Milroe is a dual-threat quarterback with elite athleticism and arm strength. His ability to thrive in spread systems with zone-read and RPO elements makes him a high-upside prospect. 36). Aireontae Ersery (OT, Minnesota) Ersery is a balanced and technically sound tackle excelling in both run and pass blocking. His consistent footwork and hand placement make him a reliable edge protector. 37). Donovan Ezeiruaku (EDGE, Boston College) Ezeiruaku is an explosive pass rusher with active hands and the ability to disrupt the pocket. His quick first step and motor make him a consistent threat off the edge. 38). Emery Jones Jr. (OT, LSU) Jones is a physically imposing tackle who excels in run-blocking schemes. His versatility and ability to hold his ground in pass protection make him a dependable option on the line. 39). Emeka Egbuka (WR, Ohio State) Egbuka is an agile route-runner with reliable hands and the ability to create separation. His versatility as a slot and deep threat adds significant value to any offense. 40). Josh Simmons (OT, Ohio State) Simmons is a powerful offensive lineman excelling in both power and zone-blocking schemes. His physicality and strong technique make him a key asset in the trenches. 41). Garrett Nussmeier (QB, LSU) High-ceiling passer with strong pocket presence and above-average mobility, excelling in vertical offenses focused on big plays. 42). Josh Conerly Jr. (OT, Oregon) Athletic tackle with excellent footwork and agility, excelling in pass protection and capable of holding his own against speed rushers. 43). Walter Nolen (IDL, Ole Miss) Powerful and disruptive interior lineman, excelling at stopping the run and generating interior pressure. 44). Landon Jackson (EDGE, Arkansas) Strong and versatile edge rusher capable of excelling in hybrid defensive schemes, with consistent ability to set the edge. 45). Josaiah Stewart (EDGE, Michigan) Quick and agile edge rusher with excellent first-step explosiveness and effective hand technique to disrupt plays. 46). Carson Beck (QB, Georgia) Pro-style passer with strong arm talent and sharp timing, thriving in rhythm-based offensive systems and play-action. 47). Evan Stewart (WR, Oregon) Dynamic receiver with top-end speed and precise route-running ability, excelling as a deep threat and reliable target. 48). Jack Sawyer (EDGE, Ohio State) High-energy rusher with strength and technique to pressure quarterbacks and defend the run effectively in various schemes. 49). Princely Umanmielen (EDGE, Ole Miss) Versatile edge rusher excelling in both 4-3 and 3-4 alignments, with power and athleticism to disrupt backfields. 50). Josh Simmons (OT, Ohio State) Physical and technically sound blocker, excelling in both power and zone schemes with a strong anchor in pass protection.

The 2025 NFL Draft is right around the corner, and as in every year, all 32 NFL teams have several holes to fill. Whether due to free agency, the need to upgrade a position, or a desire to add depth, the NFL Draft remains a cost-effective way to address these needs. Deciding whether it’s better to draft or sign free agents depends on various factors, including a team’s budget, the player’s success, and the round in which they were drafted. Each year, I conduct an analysis of team needs for all 32 NFL teams. I also include a quick evaluation of primary and secondary team needs, which helps gauge the importance of each position group in that particular year’s draft. Here is a breakdown of all 32 teams' primary needs combined. The data confirms what we already know: quarterback (QB) is by far the most important position in football, and that remains true for this year’s draft. Other top positions of need include cornerbacks (CB), edge rushers (Edge), and offensive linemen (OL). The QB Position Remains the Most Valuable Position In Football The QB position is undeniably the most critical, and in recent years, the wide receiver (WR) position has grown significantly in importance. Similarly, the demand for offensive tackles has increased because of their role in protecting the QB and supporting an effective passing game. Investing in these positions provides the best value in today’s NFL. As the WR position has grown in prominence, so too has the need for elite cornerbacks to cover these receivers. The demand for top-tier pass rushers has also risen. Teams want players who can disrupt the QB, but they also need defensive backs who can capitalize on hurried throws. Additionally, the importance of interior defensive line pressure is increasing, as teams look for ways to collapse the pocket from the inside. The good news in the 2025 NFL Draft is the abundance of defensive talent. This draft class offers depth across multiple defensive positions, including cornerbacks, pass rushers, and interior defensive linemen. Notably, this may be one of the deepest interior defensive line classes ever, with as many as three players projected to be drafted in the first 15 picks. 2025 NFL Draft Team Needs Analysis Below is a categorized list of all 32 NFL teams' primary and secondary needs. These assessments are subject to change as we approach the conclusion of the 2024 NFL season. 1). New York Giants - Primary Need: QB Secondary Needs: OT, CB, WR, IOL Needs Analysis The Giants’ offense is in dire need of a franchise quarterback and a reliable offensive line to protect him. Their secondary also requires improvement, as the lack of a strong cornerback presence has hindered defensive performance. Bolstering the wide receiver corps and guard positions will help provide offensive stability and create a stronger foundation for future success. 2). Las Vegas Raiders - Primary Need: QB Secondary Needs: WR, RB, IDL, CB Needs Analysis The Raiders' offense has struggled due to inconsistency at quarterback and a lack of playmakers. Upgrading at wide receiver and running back is critical to jump-starting their 32nd-ranked offense. Defensively, adding a dynamic defensive tackle and cornerback will address their issues in the trenches and coverage. 3). Jacksonville Jaguars - Primary Need:  CB Secondary Needs: S, WR, IDL, IOL Needs Analysis The Jaguars' defensive struggles are evident, with the secondary needing immediate attention to limit big plays. A strong interior defensive lineman is essential for improving run defense and generating pressure. Offensively, adding a reliable wide receiver and versatile guard will enhance their overall effectiveness and support Trevor Lawrence. 4). New England Patriots - Primary Need: OT Secondary Needs: CB, Edge, WR, IOL Needs Analysis The Patriots need significant upgrades at offensive tackle to protect Drake Maye and support their ground game. The lack of a consistent pass rush highlights the need for an edge defender, while improvements at cornerback and wide receiver are crucial for both defensive stability and offensive production. 5). Carolina Panthers - Primary Need: WR Secondary Needs: Edge, IDL, LB, CB Needs Analysis While Bryce Young has shown promise, the Panthers must address edge-rushing deficiencies to improve their defensive pass rush. They are still searching for a reliable wide receiver to complement Bryce Young. Defensive line depth will be critical, and adding another LB will also be a key need. 6). Cleveland Browns - Primary Need: QB Secondary Needs: OT, WR, Edge, IDL Needs Analysis The Browns require a dynamic edge rusher to enhance their pass rush alongside Myles Garrett. They also need wide receiver improvements while they try to address the uncertain quarterback situation and fortify both the offensive and defensive lines to strengthen the overall roster. 7). New York Jets - Primary Need: QB Secondary Needs: IDL, OT, TE, Edge Needs Analysis The Jets may prioritize quarterback if Aaron Rodgers departs after two seasons. Boosting defensive tackle and offensive tackle positions will enhance their run defense and quarterback protection. Reinforcements in the secondary are key to addressing potential free-agent losses. These moves aim to strengthen the team overall. 8). Tennessee Titans - Primary Need: WR Secondary Needs: IOL, Edge, OT, S Needs Analysis The Titans must add explosive wide receivers to boost their passing game and improve offensive consistency. Defensively, adding an edge rusher will enhance their front-seven impact. Upgrading at offensive tackle and guard is critical to improving line play, while safety depth is also a pressing need. 9). Cincinnati Bengals - Primary Need: CB Secondary Needs: IDL, TE, RB, WR Needs Analysis The Bengals need upgrades at cornerback to improve their pass defense and limit big plays. Offensively, adding a dynamic wide receiver and a reliable tight end will support their quarterback and bolster the passing game. Running back depth and offensive tackle improvements are also critical for sustaining offensive balance. 10). Chicago Bears - Primary Need: IOL Secondary Needs: CB, IDL, LB, WR Needs Analysis The Bears’ offensive line remains a glaring weakness, with upgrades at guard and center necessary to establish consistency in both pass protection and the run game. Defensively, adding a disruptive defensive tackle and edge rusher will help improve their ability to control the line of scrimmage and pressure opposing quarterbacks. 11). New Orleans Saints - Primary Need: IDL Secondary Needs: Edge, CB, S, OT Needs Analysis The Saints need to focus on acquiring a pass rusher to enhance their defensive line. They also require reinforcements at cornerback and safety to prepare for future exits and strengthen the secondary. On the offensive side, bringing in an offensive tackle will offer essential support for their quarterback. 12). Miami Dolphins - Primary Need: S Secondary Needs: IOL, IDL, LB, QB Needs Analysis The Dolphins need immediate reinforcements at safety to shore up their pass defense. Guard play on the offensive line has been inconsistent, requiring upgrades to support their high-powered offense. Depth at defensive tackle and linebacker is crucial for improving run defense, while quarterback depth remains a long-term consideration. 13). Dallas Cowboys - Primary Need: RB Secondary Needs: Edge, IDL, CB, WR Needs Analysis The Cowboys need to address their defensive line struggles by adding a versatile edge rusher and a stout defensive tackle. Cornerback reinforcements will help solidify their secondary. On offense, a reliable running back and an additional playmaking wide receiver are key to improving their offensive balance. 14). San Francisco 49ers - Primary Need: DT Secondary Needs: CB, Edge, IOL, LB Needs Analysis The 49ers must upgrade their cornerback position to strengthen their pass defense against high-powered offenses. Depth at offensive tackle and guard will improve their offensive line’s durability and consistency. A disruptive defensive tackle and linebacker depth are also critical for maintaining defensive dominance. 15). Indianapolis Colts - Primary Need: S Secondary Needs: IOL, Edge, CB, LB Needs Analysis The Colts might need to add a safety to bolster their secondary. Improvements on the interior offensive line are necessary to protect their quarterback and enhance the run game. Adding an edge rusher and linebacker depth will address defensive deficiencies, while safety upgrades are also a priority. 16). Los Angeles Rams - Primary Need: CB Secondary Needs: LB, IOL, WR, LB Needs Analysis The Rams must prioritize offensive line depth to ensure stability for their quarterback. Adding a shutdown cornerback and linebacker will improve defensive consistency. Offensively, the team needs a reliable wide receiver to complement their passing game, while quarterback depth remains a concern for the future. 17). Tampa Bay Buccaneers - Primary Need: WR Secondary Needs: IOL, LB, Edge, OT Needs Analysis The Buccaneers need a wide receiver to enhance their passing attack and replace aging players. Upgrades at offensive guard are critical for improving the run game and pass protection. On defense, depth at linebacker and edge rusher will bolster their ability to stop the run and pressure opposing quarterbacks, while tackle depth is also a long-term consideration. 18). Arizona Cardinals - Primary Need: Edge Secondary Needs: WR, IOL, IDL, CB Needs Analysis The Cardinals require a pass rusher to generate consistent pressure and improve their defense. Additional depth at wide receiver is crucial to support their offense and account for potential departures. Upgrades at guard and defensive tackle will help solidify the trenches, while a reliable cornerback is needed to strengthen the secondary. 19). Atlanta Falcons - Primary Need: IOL Secondary Needs: Edge, S, CB, WR Needs Analysis The Falcons need to find a center who can anchor the offensive line and improve interior blocking. An edge rusher and safety are necessary to address defensive shortcomings, while cornerback depth is needed to cover high-powered passing attacks. Adding a playmaking wide receiver will help balance their offense. 20). Seattle Seahawks - Primary Need: Edge Secondary Needs: LB, OT, IOL, QB Needs Analysis The Seahawks must add an edge rusher to improve their pass rush and defensive front. Linebacker depth will solidify their ability to stop the run, while upgrades at offensive tackle and guard are crucial for protecting their quarterback. A long-term quarterback solution should also be explored. 21). Washington Commanders - Primary Need: WR Secondary Needs: Edge, LB, CB, OT Needs Analysis The Commanders need a wide receiver to add firepower to their passing game. On defense, an edge rusher and linebacker depth are required to improve versatility and effectiveness. Upgrades at cornerback will strengthen their pass defense, while additional offensive tackle depth is necessary for protection. 22). Denver Broncos - Primary Need: OT Secondary Needs: LB, TE, S, RB Needs Analysis The Broncos must prioritize offensive tackle upgrades to protect their quarterback. Depth at linebacker and safety will bolster defensive flexibility, while a reliable tight end is needed to provide an additional offensive weapon. Running back depth is also critical for offensive balance. 23). Houston Texans - Primary Need: IOL Secondary Needs: IDL, CB, WR, Edge Needs Analysis The Texans need offensive guard reinforcements to improve interior blocking and run game effectiveness. Defensively, a disruptive defensive tackle and a cornerback are critical to solidifying their unit. Adding a wide receiver and edge rusher will provide playmaking ability on both sides of the ball. 24). Baltimore Ravens - Primary Need: OT Secondary Needs: WR, Edge, IOL, CB Needs Analysis The Ravens must strengthen their offensive line by adding tackle and guard depth to protect their quarterback and improve the run game. A dynamic wide receiver is needed to complement their passing attack, while an edge rusher and cornerback will enhance defensive versatility. 25). Los Angeles Chargers (8-4) - Primary Need: Edge Secondary Needs: IDL, IOL, WR, S Needs Analysis The Chargers need an edge rusher to provide consistency opposite Joey Bosa and improve defensive pressure. A disruptive defensive tackle is crucial for stopping the run. Depth at center will solidify their offensive line, while adding a wide receiver and safety will enhance their playmaking ability on both sides of the ball. 26). Pittsburgh Steelers (9-3) - Primary Need: QB Secondary Needs: CB, OT, RB, WR Needs Analysis The Steelers might look into a long-term solution at quarterback. A reliable cornerback is needed to improve pass defense, while upgrades at offensive tackle will bolster protection. Depth at running back and wide receiver is also critical to add versatility to their offense. 27). Green Bay Packers (9-3) - Primary Need: CB Secondary Needs: Edge, OT, IDL, WR Needs Analysis The Packers need cornerback depth to handle high-powered offenses and an edge rusher to complement Rashan Gary. Offensive tackle and defensive tackle upgrades are crucial to reinforce both trenches. Adding a wide receiver will provide an additional weapon for their young quarterback. 28). Philadelphia Eagles (10-2) - Primary Need: WR Secondary Needs: Edge, TE, LB, IOL Needs Analysis The Eagles must find a wide receiver to pair with A.J. Brown and DeVonta Smith to maintain offensive balance. An edge rusher will bolster their already strong defensive line, while adding a tight end and linebacker will improve offensive versatility and defensive flexibility. Guard depth is also needed for the offensive line. 29). Minnesota Vikings (10-2) - Primary Need: CB Secondary Needs: IDL, RB, IOL, OT Needs Analysis The Vikings need a cornerback to strengthen their secondary and a defensive tackle to improve their run defense. Depth at running back will ensure offensive stability, while upgrades at guard and offensive tackle will solidify their protection for the quarterback. 30). Buffalo Bills (10-2) - Primary Need: CB Secondary Needs: WR, Edge, IDL, S Needs Analysis The Bills must prioritize cornerback depth to handle playoff-caliber offenses. An edge rusher will complement their defensive line, while a defensive tackle is necessary to reinforce the interior. Wide receiver depth is critical to support Josh Allen, and safety depth will provide defensive flexibility. 31). Kansas City Chiefs (11-1) - Primary Need: CB Secondary Needs: IDL, IOL WR, LB Needs Analysis The Chiefs need a cornerback to anchor their secondary and a defensive tackle to solidify their defensive front. Upgrades at offensive guard will enhance their offensive line, while adding a wide receiver and linebacker will provide additional playmakers on both sides of the ball. 32). Detroit Lions (11-1) - Primary Need: Edge Secondary Needs: CB, WR, IOL, IDL Needs Analysis The Lions must add an edge rusher to complement Aidan Hutchinson and a cornerback to strengthen their secondary. Wide receiver depth will support their passing attack, while upgrades at offensive guard and defensive tackle are necessary to improve both trenches.

The inaugural 12-team CFP sparks debate as Alabama is left out, Oregon faces a tough path, and Penn State gets the easiest route on paper. The inaugural 12-team College Football Playoff (CFP) is here, but not without controversy. Alabama's exclusion in favor of SMU has ignited debates about scheduling strategies, while Oregon’s No. 1 seed faces a surprisingly tough path. Meanwhile, Penn State appears to have drawn the easiest route, raising questions about seeding fairness. As the CFP era begins, discussions around conference titles, automatic bids, and future expansions are heating up. Top Seed Oregon Draws The Most Difficult Path Another hot topic is Oregon’s placement as the No. 1 seed. Despite their top ranking, Oregon appears to have drawn the most challenging path, potentially facing the winner of the Ohio State-Tennessee matchup. Logically, many projections had the top seed playing the winner of the 5-12 matchup in the first round, but instead, they will face the 8-9 seeds, which, on paper and based on the eye test, are far better teams than they have seeded in the 5-12 slots. Penn State Draws The Easiest Path On Paper Additionally, Penn State’s path as the No. 6 seed has raised eyebrows. On paper, they seem to have the easiest route, starting with an 11-seed SMU matchup and potentially facing Boise State next. This has fueled further debate about seeding fairness in this new playoff format. Future Playoff Expansion Lastly, discussions about playoff expansion are heating up, with some speculating it could happen as early as 2026. Critics are questioning the relevance of conference titles, suggesting they might be removed entirely or that automatic bids and first-round byes for conference champions should be reconsidered. Teams with First-Round Byes No. 1 Seed – Oregon (Big Ten Champion) In their inaugural Big Ten season, the Oregon Ducks achieved a flawless 13-0 record, solidifying their position as the nation's top team. Their season featured significant victories over Ohio State and Illinois, culminating in a 45-37 triumph against Penn State in the Big Ten Championship Game. This victory was propelled by quarterback Dillon Gabriel, who threw for 283 yards and four touchdowns, and a strong ground attack led by Jordan James and Noah Whittington. Under head coach Dan Lanning, Oregon's offense has been dynamic, while the defense has consistently disrupted opponents, exemplified by forcing two critical interceptions against Penn State. As the only undefeated team in the FBS, the Ducks have earned the No. 1 seed and will face the winner of the Ohio State vs. Tennessee matchup in the Rose Bowl. This game will test Oregon's balanced and explosive play against formidable competition. No. 2 Seed – Georgia (SEC Champion) Despite losing quarterback Carson Beck to injury just before halftime, Georgia claimed the SEC title with a dramatic 31-24 overtime victory against Texas. Backup quarterback Gunner Stockton stepped in and managed the game effectively while running back Trevor Etienne sealed the victory with a game-winning touchdown in overtime. The Bulldogs’ defense also played a critical role, holding Texas to just three points in the second half of regulation to force overtime. Under head coach Kirby Smart, Georgia showcased the resilience and team depth that has made them a perennial championship contender. The Bulldogs now look to continue their journey to a national championship as the No. 2 seed. They will face the winner of the Notre Dame vs. Indiana first-round matchup in the Sugar Bowl, where Georgia’s stout defense and versatile offense will look to advance further in the CFP. No. 3 Seed – Boise State (Mountain West Champion) Boise State's ascent to the No. 3 seed in the College Football Playoff marks a significant milestone in the program's history. The Broncos clinched the Mountain West Championship with a commanding 21-7 victory over UNLV. Running back Ashton Jeanty was instrumental, rushing for 209 yards and a touchdown, further solidifying his status as a Heisman Trophy contender. The Broncos concluded the season with a 12-1 record, their sole defeat being a narrow loss to Oregon, underscoring their competitiveness against top-tier teams. Defensively, Boise State has been solid, allowing an average of 22.6 points per game. This balanced performance on both offense and defense has been pivotal in securing their first-round bye. Looking ahead, Boise State is set to compete in the Fiesta Bowl against the winner of the Penn State vs. SMU matchup. Their potent running game, spearheaded by Jeanty, combined with a resilient defense, positions them as a formidable contender in their inaugural College Football Playoff appearance. No. 4 Seed – Arizona State (Big 12 Champion) Arizona State's remarkable season under head coach Kenny Dillingham culminated in a decisive 45-19 victory over Iowa State in the Big 12 Championship. Quarterback Sam Leavitt, a redshirt freshman, orchestrated the offense with precision, amassing 219 passing yards and three touchdowns. Leavitt's outstanding performance throughout the season earned him the Big 12 Offensive Freshman of the Year award. Complementing Leavitt's aerial assault, running back Cam Skattebo powered the ground game, contributing significantly to the Sun Devils' offensive balance. Skattebo's versatility was on full display, as he accounted for three touchdowns—two rushing and one receiving—in the championship game. Defensively, Arizona State has been formidable, allowing an average of 21.3 points per game, showcasing their ability to stifle opponents and create scoring opportunities for their offense. The Sun Devils' impressive 11-2 record and Big 12 title have secured them a first-round bye in the College Football Playoff. They are set to face the winner of the Texas vs. Clemson matchup in the Peach Bowl. With a potent offense led by Leavitt and a resilient defense, Arizona State is poised to make a significant impact in its inaugural CFP appearance. First-Round Matchups No. 12 Clemson (ACC Champion) at No. 5 Texas Texas, the SEC runner-up, will host ACC champion Clemson in a highly anticipated first-round matchup. Despite their 31-24 overtime loss to Georgia in the SEC Championship, the Longhorns' dynamic offense, led by Quinn Ewers, remains a formidable threat. Clemson, under Dabo Swinney, enters the game with momentum following a last-second field goal victory in the ACC title game. No. 9 Tennessee at No. 8 Ohio State Tennessee’s balanced offense travels to Columbus to face an Ohio State squad eager to bounce back from their regular-season finale loss to Michigan. Both teams hold 10-2 records, and this matchup could hinge on the performance of Ohio State’s defense against Tennessee’s high-powered attack. No. 11 SMU at No. 6 Penn State SMU’s inclusion in the playoff as the No. 11 seed has been one of the most debated decisions, but their offensive prowess has earned them a shot at the Nittany Lions. Penn State, fresh off a narrow 45-37 loss to Oregon in the Big Ten Championship, boasts a stout defense and a balanced offense that will test SMU’s capabilities. Happy Valley is set to host a fierce battle for the right to advance to the quarterfinals. No. 10 Indiana at No. 7 Notre Dame Indiana’s Cinderella season continues with a trip to South Bend to face Notre Dame. Under first-year head coach Curt Cignetti, the Hoosiers turned a 3-9 record in 2023 into an impressive 11-1 campaign. Meanwhile, Notre Dame, riding a 10-game win streak, enters with confidence as they seek their first national title since 1988.

Earlier this year, I posed two questions in a video: Is Bo Nix the right fit for a Sean Payton offense? Should Bo Nix start right away in 2024 for the Denver Broncos? With the 2024 NFL season nearly complete, the answer to both is a resounding YES. Bo Nix has not only proven himself as a starting quarterback but has thrived under Payton, leading the Broncos to a 7-5 record and into playoff contention. Here’s a detailed look at how Nix’s rookie campaign stacks up against other quarterbacks who have played for Sean Payton, including Drew Brees, Jameis Winston, and Russell Wilson. Bo Nix vs. Sean Payton’s Past QBs Since taking over as a head coach in 2006, Sean Payton has been a quarterback whisperer, extracting peak performances from various signal-callers. Here’s how Bo Nix’s rookie season compares: How Bo Nix Compares to Sean Payton’s First-Year QBs Drew Brees (2006): In Payton’s first season as head coach, Brees led the league in passing yards (4,418), ranked second in completions (356), and threw for 26 touchdowns against 11 interceptions. His 96.2 passer rating was among the best in the NFL that year, and he carried the Saints to the NFC Championship Game. While Bo Nix is unlikely to match Brees’ legendary numbers, Nix’s 64.9% completion rate and 16:6 TD-to-INT ratio as a rookie signal strong potential as a long-term answer for Denver. Additionally, Nix’s mobility (300 rushing yards) adds a dynamic element not present in Brees’ game. Jameis Winston (2021): Winston’s 2021 season with Payton was brief but efficient, with a 14:3 TD-to-INT ratio and a 102.8 passer rating. However, Winston played just seven games and totaled only 1,170 passing yards, averaging 167.1 yards per game. Nix, by comparison, is averaging 212.3 yards per game and outpaces Winston in completion percentage (+5.9%) and total yards. Nix’s poise and decision-making already appear more advanced than Winston’s during their respective first years with Payton, evidenced by Nix’s sustained efficiency over a larger sample size. Russell Wilson (2023): Wilson posted strong numbers in his lone season under Payton, including a 66.4% completion rate, 3,070 passing yards, and a 26:8 TD-to-INT ratio. However, his season ended in disappointment as the Broncos missed the playoffs, and Wilson was benched late in the year. In contrast, Nix has rejuvenated the Broncos with a playoff push and has been more consistent in protecting the ball, with just six interceptions through 12 games. Additionally, Nix’s dual-threat ability has added versatility to Payton’s system, something Wilson struggled to deliver consistently during his time in Denver. The Rookie Record Chase Bo Nix has made a strong case for NFL Offensive Rookie of the Year , sitting alongside Jayden Daniels as a top contender. Here’s where he stands: Touchdowns:  Nix leads all rookies with 16 passing touchdowns. Passing Yards:  His 2,548 yards rank third among rookies, despite playing fewer games than some of his peers. Rushing Impact:  Nix’s mobility has been an asset, contributing 300 rushing yards and four touchdowns, adding a dual-threat element to Denver’s offense. With four more passing touchdowns , Nix would become just the second Broncos quarterback since Peyton Manning (2014) to throw for 20+ touchdowns in a season. Efficiency Metrics: Nix Joins Elite Company In the past eight games, Nix has achieved a rare statistical feat: Sack Avoidance:  Nix’s sack rate is one per 20.1 pass attempts, ranking among the league’s best. Turnover Avoidance:  With just two interceptions over his last eight games, Nix joins Dak Prescott (2016)  and C.J. Stroud (2023)  as the only rookies since 1970 to combine a low sack rate and elite interception rate over a similar span. Sean Payton praised Nix’s ability to avoid negative plays , crediting both the quarterback and the offensive line: Show me good pass-protection metrics, and I’ll show you a quarterback that doesn’t take sacks. - Sean Payton Discussing Bo Nix Conclusion: Bo Nix Is the Right Fit Bo Nix’s rookie season has exceeded expectations, solidifying his role as the Broncos’ franchise quarterback. Sean Payton’s offense has been the perfect fit, blending Nix’s strengths in decision-making, efficiency, and mobility. While comparisons to Drew Brees are premature, Nix’s trajectory under Payton’s guidance gives Denver fans a reason to believe their quarterback woes are finally behind them.

The Michigan Wolverines have done it again, beating Ohio State for the fourth consecutive year. The key to their success? Dominating the fourth quarter. This trend has defined the rivalry since 2021, and it’s worth a deep dive to understand how Michigan has managed to consistently outlast the Buckeyes. How Michigan Has Done It Michigan’s dominance in the 4th quarter has been the cornerstone of their recent success against Ohio State. The Wolverines’ strategy is simple but brutally effective: wear down their opponent with physicality, control the clock, and impose their will in the trenches when it matters most. Here’s a breakdown of the 4th-quarter data from the last four games: Time of Possession (TOP):  Michigan has averaged 9:45 of 4th-quarter possession time per game, compared to Ohio State’s 5:14. This near 2-to-1 advantage reflects Michigan’s ability to sustain drives and keep the ball out of Ohio State’s hands. Rushing Attempts and Yards:  The Wolverines have averaged nearly 15 rushing attempts and 98 yards in the 4th quarter, compared to Ohio State’s meager 4 attempts and 8 yards. Over the four games, Michigan has outgained Ohio State 394 to 32 total rushing yards in the final quarter. Yards After Contact (YAContact):  Michigan has also dominated in yards after contact, amassing 176 total yards, an average of 44 per game. This highlights their physical edge and ability to break tackles late in games. 1st Downs and Execution:  Michigan’s 4th-quarter rushing attack has produced 17 first downs, keeping drives alive and wearing down Ohio State’s defense. The story of the rivalry is written in these numbers. Michigan’s 4th-quarter performances are where they have taken control, playing a “bend but don’t break” style on defense and suffocating the Buckeyes with their ground game. Why Ohio State Has Struggled The narrative surrounding Ohio State’s recent struggles against Michigan isn’t about talent. In fact, Ohio State has had the more talented roster on paper in each of the last four years. The issue lies in development, strength and conditioning, and the mental approach to this rivalry. Ohio State has struggled to win at the line of scrimmage, particularly late in games. Their inability to establish a consistent ground game has been glaring. Over four years, Ohio State has averaged just 1.9 yards per carry in the 4th quarter, compared to Michigan’s 6.7 yards per carry. This disparity underscores Michigan’s physical dominance and Ohio State’s failure to match it. What About Ryan Day? There’s plenty of speculation about Ryan Day’s future as Ohio State’s head coach, but here’s the reality: a coaching change is unlikely unless the Buckeyes falter early in the College Football Playoff. Reports suggest that Ohio State’s administration is hesitant to pay Day’s buyout, preferring to allocate resources to NIL initiatives. Instead of a head coaching change, Ohio State is more likely to reevaluate their strength and conditioning program and their internal scouting and analytics. These areas will be critical if they hope to close the gap with Michigan and regain control of the rivalry. Where Does Ohio State Go From Here? Despite their recent struggles, Ohio State still boasts one of the most talented rosters in college football. With time to regroup and address injuries along the offensive line, the Buckeyes have the potential to make a deep playoff run and even win the national championship. However, long-term success in this rivalry will require structural changes, particularly in their approach to strength and conditioning and player development. Final Thoughts Michigan’s recent success against Ohio State boils down to their ability to dominate the 4th quarter. They control the clock, execute in the run game, and physically wear down their opponent. This formula has been the difference over the last four years, and if Ohio State hopes to flip the script, they’ll need to match Michigan’s physicality and address their shortcomings in the trenches. Let us know your thoughts. Can Ohio State turn things around? Should they keep Ryan Day if they don’t reach the national title game? Leave your comments below and be sure to like this article, subscribe to our channel, and stay tuned for more great content.

As the fantasy football regular season reaches its conclusion, Week 14 presents unique challenges with the Ravens, Broncos, Texans, Colts, Patriots, and Commanders all on bye. For fantasy football managers pushing for the playoffs, here are the top waiver wire targets to help fill gaps and secure a competitive edge. Must-Add Waiver Wire Targets to Navigate Late-Season Bye Weeks Quarterbacks Will Levis, Tennessee Titans (Rostered: 4.0%) Levis continues to show promise after his Week 12 performance of 278 passing yards and two touchdowns. With matchups against the Jaguars (twice), Bengals, and Colts from Weeks 14-17, Levis is primed for success. The Titans’ soft schedule makes him a reliable QB2 option with potential upside for the playoffs. Matthew Stafford, Los Angeles Rams (Rostered: 28.3%) Stafford bounced back in Week 12 with 278 passing yards and two touchdowns, finishing as a top-12 QB. When Cooper Kupp and Puka Nacua are healthy, Stafford thrives, averaging over 18 fantasy points per game in his last two full outings. While matchups against the Browns and Ravens are tough, Stafford is a strong depth option for QB-needy teams. Running Backs Jeremy McNichols, Washington Commanders (Rostered: 1.2%) With Brian Robinson Jr. (ankle) and Austin Ekeler (concussion) sidelined, McNichols has an opportunity to shine. In Week 13, he played a significant role, totaling 32 rushing yards on six carries. Facing the Titans in Week 14, McNichols’ versatility makes him a high-priority waiver claim, especially for managers needing a fill-in RB. Jordan Mason, San Francisco 49ers (Rostered: 42.0%) With Christian McCaffrey’s knee injury in Week 13, Mason stepped up, leading the 49ers with 78 rushing yards on 13 carries. Mason has proven his value in McCaffrey’s absence earlier this season and would be a plug-and-play RB1 should McCaffrey miss additional time. Mason is a must-add for any team needing running back depth. Sincere McCormick, Las Vegas Raiders (Rostered: 0.0%) McCormick emerged as the Raiders’ lead rusher in Week 13, tallying 64 rushing yards on 12 carries. Injuries to Alexander Mattison and Zamir White have opened the door for McCormick to secure a larger role. While his status depends on the health of his teammates, McCormick’s efficiency (5.3 yards per carry) makes him an intriguing bench stash. Wide Receivers Nick Westbrook-Ikhine, Tennessee Titans (Rostered: 17.0%) Westbrook-Ikhine’s touchdown streak extended in Week 13 with two scores on three receptions for 61 yards. He’s found the end zone eight times in his last eight games, solidifying his role as a key red-zone target. With the Titans’ favorable schedule, Westbrook-Ikhine is a WR3/flex option for managers in need of consistent production. Marquez Valdes-Scantling, New Orleans Saints (Rostered: 15.6%) Valdes-Scantling has emerged as a key big-play weapon for the Saints, highlighted by 196 receiving yards and three touchdowns over Weeks 10 and 11. While his deep-threat role can lead to boom-or-bust performances, his ability to deliver game-changing plays makes him a worthwhile addition for teams needing upside at WR. With the Saints’ favorable schedule, Valdes-Scantling is a potential flex play for the fantasy playoffs. Parker Washington, Jacksonville Jaguars (Rostered: 1.0%) Washington stepped up in Week 13 with Trevor Lawrence sidelined, posting six catches for 103 yards and a touchdown on 12 targets. With Lawrence’s status uncertain and a matchup against the Titans’ struggling secondary in Week 14, Washington is a sneaky add for WR-needy teams looking for immediate production. Adam Thielen, Carolina Panthers (Rostered: 19.9%) Thielen returned to form in Week 13, averaging 7.0 targets, 5.5 receptions, and 78 receiving yards per game since Week 12. His chemistry with Bryce Young makes him a reliable flex option, especially in PPR formats. As the Panthers face favorable matchups ahead, Thielen is a valuable depth piece for the playoffs. Tight Ends Dawson Knox, Buffalo Bills (Rostered: 8%) Knox led the Bills in receiving on a cold, snowy evening in Buffalo during Week 13, highlighted by a 39-yard reception in the second quarter. With Dalton Kincaid sidelined due to a knee injury, Knox has stepped into a larger role, earning a 14% target share over the last two weeks. The Rams, Knox's Week 14 opponent, have struggled to defend tight ends, allowing the eighth-most fantasy points per game to the position. If Kincaid remains out, Knox becomes a top streaming option for managers without a locked-in top-5 tight end. Juwan Johnson, New Orleans Saints (Rostered: 4%) In Week 13, Juwan Johnson led the New Orleans Saints in receiving yards, catching five of seven targets for 36 yards in a 21-14 loss to the Los Angeles Rams. With Taysom Hill likely sidelined due to a knee injury, Johnson is expected to see increased targets, making him a viable streaming option for Week 14. The Saints face the New York Giants, who have allowed the eighth-most fantasy points per game to tight ends this season. Johnson's expanded role and favorable matchup position him as a valuable addition for fantasy managers seeking tight end depth. Proactive Planning for the Fantasy Football Playoffs Week 14’s byepocalypse creates significant roster gaps, but these waiver-wire pickups provide key opportunities to address positional needs and maintain momentum heading into the fantasy playoffs. Act quickly to secure these impactful players before your league competitors do.

Evaluating the Michigan vs. Ohio State rivalry through the lens of NFL Draft success, recruiting, and on-field performance, highlighting Ohio State's consistent top-5 classes and Michigan's resurgence with three straight wins, Big Ten titles, and a national championship. In this analysis, I aimed to examine how Michigan and Ohio State compare in terms of player development by evaluating the number of players each program places in the NFL. To do this, I reviewed data starting with the 2014 NFL Draft class to the current day, which includes players developed under two coaching regimes at each school: Urban Meyer (2012–2018) and Ryan Day at Ohio State (2019-current), versus the end of Brady Hoke’s tenure in Ann Arbor (2014) and the subsequent hiring of Jim Harbaugh. The Hypothesis? The hypothesis is straightforward: I want to evaluate each school’s overall success by examining total wins per season and whether there is a correlation with the number of NFL Draft prospects each school produces. Of course, several factors can influence this data. For example, Michigan lost nearly its entire offense from the 2023 National Championship team and is now under the leadership of a new head coach, Sherrone Moore, in 2024. As a result, they enter the season's final week at 6–5. On the other hand, Ohio State, much like Michigan in 2023, managed to retain many of its top players through NIL deals. They also filled roster gaps with high-level talent from the transfer portal, positioning themselves for a run at the National Title in 2024. This contrast highlights how roster management strategies can significantly impact a program’s success in both player development and on-field performance. With that said, this analysis will naturally have limitations and gaps. However, the focus here is on recognizing the immense talent these two programs have put on the field, particularly in recent years, as Michigan has bridged the gap and won three consecutive games in the rivalry. Ohio State Football Is a Football Talent Factory Let's start the analysis with a quick overview of the recruiting rankings since 2014. Using 247 Sports recruiting rankings from 2014 to 2024 , it’s clear that Ohio State has consistently been an elite football talent factory, regularly ranking in the top 5 year after year. Michigan, while competitive with an average class rank in the top 15 during this period, has seen more success breaking into the top 10 in recent years. Ohio State outpaces Michigan with nearly all its classes ranked in the top 10 and a majority in the top 5, whereas Michigan has managed only one top 5 class and consistently lags behind in overall rankings. Ohio State has consistently outperformed Michigan in recruiting rankings over the past decade, with nearly all its classes ranked in the top 10 and a majority in the top 5. Michigan, while showing competitiveness, has only one top 5 class and averages a significantly lower recruiting rank overall. ​ Recruiting Rankings Summary (2014–2024) Average Recruiting Rank Ohio State : 4.64 Michigan : 15.00 Top 10 Recruiting Classes Ohio State : 10 Michigan : 5 Top 5 Recruiting Classes Ohio State : 9 Michigan : 1 NFL Draft Breakdown (2014–2024) Ohio State has consistently demonstrated its dominance in producing NFL-ready talent, with a total of 82 draft picks compared to Michigan's 72. This trend highlights Ohio State’s ability to develop players who transition to the next level effectively. The Buckeyes also maintain a significant edge in elite-level talent production, with 24 Day One picks—more than double Michigan’s 11. Ohio State continues to outperform in Day Two selections, with 31 picks compared to Michigan’s 24, further solidifying its reputation as a top-tier talent pipeline. Michigan, while trailing in Day One and Day Two picks, leads in Day Three selections with 37 compared to Ohio State’s 27. This reflects Michigan’s ability to develop a broader pool of draftable players, even if those players typically lack the immediate impact associated with Day One or Day Two picks. Notably, this disparity aligns with recruiting trends, as Ohio State consistently ranks in the top 5–10 nationally, with an average recruiting rank of 4.6 since 2014. Draft Data (2014–2024) Total NFL Draft Picks Ohio State: 82 Michigan: 72 Day One Picks (First Round) Ohio State: 24 Michigan: 11 Day Two Picks (Rounds 2–3) Ohio State: 31 Michigan: 24 Day Three Picks (Rounds 4–7) Ohio State: 27 Michigan: 37 On-Field Performance: All Opponents (2014–2024) When evaluating on-field performance, Ohio State has been the more dominant program over the past decade. Their consistency is reflected in their higher win totals, superior win percentage, and significantly fewer losses compared to Michigan. While Ohio State controlled the rivalry from 2014–2019, Michigan has shifted the balance in recent years, highlighted by their three consecutive wins since 2021. The following breakdown provides a clearer picture of each program’s performance against all opponents and in head-to-head matchups. Overall Performance (2014–2024) Total Wins: Ohio State: 125 Michigan: 100 Win Percentage: Ohio State: 89% Michigan: 70% Total Losses: Ohio State: 16 Michigan: 37 Head-to-Head Rivalry (2014–2023) Record: Ohio State: 7 wins Michigan: 3 wins Average Margin of Victory: Ohio State (2014–2019) : 18.17 points per game Michigan (2021–2023) : 14.33 points per game The Recent Trends and Michigan's Resurgence (2021–2024) Michigan has averaged 9 NFL Draft picks per year over the past three drafts, surpassing Ohio State's 5.3 picks. Its three consecutive wins in the rivalry, three Big Ten titles, and a national championship in 2023 underscore just how dominant Michigan has been in the head-to-head vs. Ohio State both on the field and in the NFL Draft. Conclusion: Evaluating Michigan vs. Ohio State Player Development and Success (2014–2024) Based on this analysis, Ohio State has consistently outperformed Michigan in several key areas tied to player development and overall success. The Buckeyes' dominance in recruiting rankings, NFL Draft productivity, and on-field performance highlights their sustained position as a top-tier program. Ohio State's ability to consistently rank in the top 5 for recruiting, produce elite Day One and Day Two NFL talent and maintain an 89% win percentage underscores their long-term efficiency in developing top-caliber players. However, Michigan's recent resurgence has shifted the dynamics of this rivalry. With three consecutive wins over Ohio State, three Big Ten titles, and a 2023 National Championship, Michigan has demonstrated its ability to close the gap both on the field and in NFL Draft productivity. Michigan's increase to an average of nine NFL Draft picks per year over the past three drafts reflects its improved ability to develop talent. But moving forward without Jim Harbaugh, can Michigan maintain this level of consistency? Key Insights: Recruiting Rankings : Ohio State's average rank of 4.64  is significantly better than Michigan's 15.00 , with the Buckeyes securing nearly all of their classes in the top 10. Michigan, while competitive, has only achieved one top-5 class in the past decade. NFL Draft Productivity : Ohio State leads with 82 total draft picks  since 2014, compared to Michigan's 72 . The Buckeyes dominate in Day One (24 vs. 11) and Day Two (31 vs. 24) picks, reflecting their edge in producing elite NFL-ready talent. On-Field Performance : Ohio State's 125 wins and 89% win percentage  outshine Michigan's 100 wins and 70% win percentage , though Michigan has been the dominant force in the rivalry since 2021, averaging a 14.33-point margin of victory during this period and winning 93% of their games from 2021 to 2023. Final Assessment of the Hypothesis: The hypothesis—evaluating success through wins per season and NFL Draft productivity—holds true in this comparison. Ohio State's correlation between recruiting dominance, elite NFL talent production, and on-field success is evident. Michigan, while less consistent historically, has leveraged improved recruiting, player development, and on-field performance to significantly narrow the gap in recent years.

Here's a breakdown of NFL Week 13 Waiver Wire Targets for fantasy football, focusing on key players, performance insights, and their potential value for upcoming matchups. These recommendations highlight reasons to add these players and how they can contribute to your playoff push. Planning In Advance of Week 14 Bye Weeks As the fantasy football playoffs approach, it's crucial to proactively manage your roster, especially with the upcoming bye weeks. In Week 13, all 32 NFL teams are active; however, Week 14 presents a significant challenge with six teams on bye: the Baltimore Ravens, Denver Broncos, Houston Texans, Indianapolis Colts, New England Patriots, and Washington Commanders Must-Add Waiver Wire Targets to Navigate Late-Season Bye Weeks Quarterbacks Will Levis, Tennessee Titans (Rostered: 4.0%) Levis delivered 278 passing yards and two touchdowns in Week 12, solidifying himself as a top-12 QB option despite facing immense pressure (sacked eight times). With matchups against the Jaguars (twice), Bengals, and Colts from Weeks 14-17, he holds massive potential for managers seeking a reliable starter during the playoffs. Matthew Stafford, Los Angeles Rams (Rostered: 28.3%) Stafford rebounded in Week 12 with 278 passing yards and two touchdowns, finishing as a top-12 fantasy QB. When Cooper Kupp and Puka Nacua are healthy, Stafford has proven to be a reliable option, averaging over 18 fantasy points per game in his last two full outings. While upcoming matchups against the Browns and Ravens are challenging, he's a valuable depth piece for QB-needy teams heading into the fantasy playoffs. Running Backs Jeremy McNichols, Washington Commanders (Rostered: 1.2%) Injuries to Brian Robinson Jr. (ankle) and Austin Ekeler (concussion) open the door for McNichols, who has previously thrived in an expanded role. Facing the Titans in Week 13, he could see lead-back duties, making him a high-priority waiver claim. Ameer Abdullah, Las Vegas Raiders (Rostered: 17.1%) Abdullah posted 17.5 fantasy points in Week 12, handling 13 touches for 65 yards and a receiving TD. If Alexander Mattison and Zamir White remain sidelined, Abdullah’s potential for high volume makes him an excellent addition, even against the Chiefs’ tough run defense. Gus Edwards, Los Angeles Chargers (Rostered: 23.4%) Edwards’ efficiency (4.5 yards per carry) keeps him a valuable stash. With the Chargers facing favorable playoff matchups, including the Patriots in Week 17, Edwards could emerge as a reliable flex or RB2 option down the stretch. Wide Receivers Nick Westbrook-Ikhine, Tennessee Titans (Rostered: 7.5%) Westbrook-Ikhine continues to deliver with a touchdown in six of his last seven games. Averaging 61.5 receiving yards per game over the past month, he offers steady WR3/flex value, especially with the Titans’ soft remaining schedule. Marquez Valdes-Scantling, New Orleans Saints (Rostered: 15.6%) Valdes-Scantling has emerged as a big-play weapon, posting 196 yards and three touchdowns in Weeks 10-11. While his deep-threat role makes him boom or bust, his potential to deliver high-scoring games makes him worth rostering for playoff matchups. Dontayvion Wicks, Green Bay Packers (Rostered: 9.5%) Wicks is primed for an increased role with Romeo Doubs in concussion protocol. In Week 12, Wicks played significant snaps and boasts strong targets-per-route metrics. With a favorable playoff schedule, Wicks is a sneaky deep-league add. Tight Ends Will Dissly, Los Angeles Chargers (Rostered: 35.5%) Dissly’s Week 11 breakout (80 yards and one TD) underscores his rising target share. The Chargers face tight-end-friendly matchups in the coming weeks, making him a valuable streaming option for managers navigating injuries or bye weeks. Chig Okonkwo, Tennessee Titans (Rostered: 4.8%) Okonkwo’s Week 12 performance (70 yards and one TD on a single target) hints at his big-play potential. With an exceptional playoff schedule against bottom-tier defenses, Okonkwo offers significant upside for TE-needy teams.

2025 NFL Draft: Top 5 Running Back Prospects Ranked by Our Exclusive Player Grades Below are my top 5 RB rankings based on our current grades ahead of the 2025 NFL Draft. It is important to remember these grades are subject to change once we get into the college all-star game circuit and post-NFL Combine. The 2025 NFL Draft is set to showcase one of the most talented running back classes in recent memory, rivaling the historic 2017 RB draft in talent and depth. With Ashton Jeanty leading as an early favorite for RB1, it’s almost certain we’ll see at least one first-round RB selection. This class is packed with potential, and we could see as many as six running backs drafted in the first two rounds. Top 5 Running Back Prospects Ranked by Our Exclusive Player Grades Ashton Jeanty, Boise State Ht:  5'9" Wt:  210 lbs Grade:  Elite Projected Draft Round:  Round 1 Summary:  A versatile RB with outstanding agility and vision, Jeanty shines in zone-blocking schemes and brings dynamic pass-catching ability. He projects as a top-15 pick with breakaway potential and elite playmaking. Omarion Hampton, North Carolina Ht:  6'0" Wt:  220 lbs Grade:  High-End Starter Potential Projected Draft Round:  Early Day 2 Summary:  Hampton combines power, speed, and vision, fitting well in both power and zone-blocking schemes. His reliable three-down versatility and Nick Chubb-like style make him a strong early Day 2 option. Quinshon Judkins, Ohio State Ht:  5'11" Wt:  210 lbs Grade:  High Starter Potential Projected Draft Round:  Mid-to-Late Day 2 Summary:  Judkins is an elusive, powerful back with sharp cutting ability and a knack for gaining yards after contact, making him an excellent choice for teams needing a balanced offensive weapon. Kaleb Johnson, Iowa Ht:  6'0" Wt:  225 lbs Grade:  High Starter Potential Projected Draft Round:  Day 2 Summary:  Known for his one-cut style and durability, Johnson excels in creating yards after contact. He’s an ideal fit for teams prioritizing physical, power-based rushing. TreVeyon Henderson, Ohio State Ht:  5'11" Wt:  215 lbs Grade:  Mid-Level Starter Potential Projected Draft Round:  Day 2 Summary:  Henderson brings a two-phase skill set, with twitchy, explosive playmaking both on the ground and in the air. He’s versatile and fits seamlessly into modern, multifaceted NFL offenses. Other Top Names to Watch Several additional running backs narrowly missed the top five, each bringing unique strengths to the 2025 draft class: Nick Singleton (Penn State):  Strong Day 2 or 3 potential with a well-rounded skill set. DJ Giddens (Kansas State):  Known for his powerful yet agile running style. Ollie Gordon II (Oklahoma State):  A dynamic playmaker with big-play potential. RJ Harvey (UCF):  Brings versatility and reliability in both rushing and receiving. Tahj Brooks (Texas Tech):  A consistent, powerful runner who excels in tough situations. Kyle Monangai (Rutgers):  Combines toughness with excellent vision. This RB class runs deep, offering NFL teams quality talent that will likely extend into Day 3 of the draft.

Top 5 Tight End Prospects Ranked by Our Exclusive Player Grades Below are my top 5 TE rankings based on our current grades ahead of the 2025 NFL Draft. It is important to remember these grades are subject to change once we get into the college all-star game circuit and post-NFL Combine. The 2025 TE class features a blend of athletic, versatile prospects with high ceilings. Colston Loveland leads the group, followed by other standouts like Penn State's Tyler Warren and Bowling Green's Harold Fannin. Each of the top TEs brings unique skill sets to various offensive schemes. This TE group is deep and talented, with significant potential. There could be a few Day 1 picks at the position, and several more could be drafted on Days 2 and 3 of the 2025 NFL Draft. Top 5 Tight End Prospects Ranked by Our Exclusive Player Grades 1). Colston Loveland, Michigan Ht:  6'5" Wt:  245 lbs Projected Draft Round:  Round 1 Summary:  Loveland is an athletic tight end with size, speed, and versatility. His ability to stretch the field vertically and horizontally makes him a mismatch in traditional and spread formations. He offers elite upside as both a receiver and blocker. 2). Tyler Warren, Penn State Ht:  6'6" Wt:  260 lbs Projected Draft Round:  Early Day 2 Summary:  Warren is a physical, versatile TE who excels in blocking and red-zone situations. His ability to line up in multiple positions enhances his value in offenses that rely on tight ends as key contributors in both the run and pass games. 3). Harold Fannin Jr., Bowling Green Ht:  6'4" Wt:  230 lbs Projected Draft Round:  Day 2 Summary:  Fannin is a versatile TE who thrives as a blocker and short-to-intermediate receiver. His reliable hands as a receiver, combined with his ability to box out, are elite. 4). Oronde Gadsden II, Syracuse Ht:  6'5" Wt:  240 lbs Projected Draft Round:  Late Day 2 Summary:  Gadsden is a hybrid TE/slot receiver with elite hands and a massive catch radius. Though his blocking needs improvement, his ability to exploit mismatches as a pass-catcher makes him a valuable flex option. 5). Mason Taylor, LSU Ht:  6'6" Wt:  250 lbs Projected Draft Round:  Day 3 Summary:  Taylor is a versatile TE with natural hands and high football IQ. He thrives over the middle of the field and as a contested-catch specialist but needs to develop his separation ability and blocking consistency. Other Top Names to Watch Several additional tight ends narrowly missed the top five, each bringing unique strengths to the 2025 draft class: Mitchell Evans (Notre Dame):  6'5", 260 lbs – A big-bodied TE with excellent hands and the ability to win in contested catch situations. Best suited for traditional in-line roles. Gunnar Helm (Texas):  6'5", 250 lbs – A strong blocker with underrated receiving skills, capable of contributing in multiple alignments. Luke Lachey (Iowa):  6'5", 253 lbs – A balanced TE effective as both a blocker and pass-catcher, with a knack for contested catches. Brant Kuithe (Utah):  6'2", 222 lbs – A dynamic pass-catching TE with strong route running and versatility in spread or West Coast offenses. This TE class offers a wide range of options, from high-ceiling developmental projects to polished contributors ready to make an immediate impact. NFL teams will find value at every stage of the draft.

2025 NFL Draft: Top 5 Wide Receiver Prospects Ranked by Our Exclusive Player Grades Below are my top 5 WR rankings based on our current grades ahead of the 2025 NFL Draft. It is important to remember these grades are subject to change once we get into the college all-star game circuit and post-NFL Combine. The debate about the WR1 will be decided by Travis Hunter's decision on what position he will declare during the NFL Draft process. He might be steadfast about being listed as a two-way athlete, so that's what we have him listed as. If Hunter decides to go the WR route full-time, he would be our WR1 in the class. If he chooses the CB route, he would be a close second to Will Johnson as the top DB in the 2025 NFL Draft class. The 2025 WR class offers an intriguing mix of size, speed, and versatility, with multiple prospects capable of becoming high-impact NFL starters. If Travis Hunter decides to play DB full-time, Tetairoa McMillan would take the lead at the top of the WR class as a prototypical X-receiver with size and body control, followed by Luther Burden III, who adds dynamic playmaking ability from the slot. While this class might lack the top-end talent we had in the 2024 NFL Draft, this group is starting to provide solid depth and varying versatility. Top 5 Wide Receiver Prospects Ranked by Our Exclusive Player Grades 1). Travis Hunter, Colorado Ht:  6'1" Wt:  185 lbs Grade:  Near Elite Projected Draft Round:  Round 1 Summary:  Hunter’s two-way ability is unprecedented, but his WR skill set is elite. With explosive burst, exceptional ball tracking, and run-after-catch ability, Hunter fits perfectly into a vertical passing offense or creative schemes that maximize his after-catch ability and downfield playmaking. 2). Tetairoa McMillan, Arizona Ht:  6'5" Wt:  210 lbs Grade:  Near Elite Projected Draft Round:  Round 1 Summary:  McMillan combines elite size, body control, and a wide catch radius, making him a nightmare matchup for defenders. Best suited for vertically-oriented schemes, he thrives on contested catches and downfield opportunities. 3). Luther Burden III, Missouri Ht:  5'11" Wt:  208 lbs Grade:  High-End Starter Potential Projected Draft Round:  Late Round 1 / Early Day 2 Summary:  Burden is a dynamic slot receiver with elite run-after-catch ability. His agility and burst make him dangerous in motion-heavy offenses that prioritize quick passes and screens to get him into space. 4). Elic Ayomanor, Stanford Ht:  6'2" Wt:  210 lbs Grade:  High-End Starter Potential Projected Draft Round:  Early Day 2 Summary:  Ayomanor excels as an X-receiver, stretching the field with speed and reliability in contested situations. His combination of physicality and route running makes him a valuable asset in both pro-style and spread offenses. 5). Isaiah Bond, Texas Ht:  5'11" Wt:  182 lbs Grade:  High-End Starter Potential Projected Draft Round:  Mid-to-Late Day 2 Summary:  Bond is a vertical threat with elite speed and explosive playmaking ability. Best suited for a West Coast spread offense, his separation skills and after-the-catch explosiveness stand out. Other Top Names to Watch Several additional wide receivers narrowly missed the top five, each bringing unique strengths to the 2025 draft class. Emeka Egbuka (Ohio State):  6'1", 205 lbs – A versatile WR who thrives both inside and outside, excelling at creating separation and making plays at all levels of the field. Evan Stewart (Oregon):  6'0", 175 lbs – A smooth route runner with elite separation skills and the ability to stretch the field vertically. Tory Horton (Colorado State):  6'2", 190 lbs – A polished receiver with reliable hands and a knack for finding soft spots in coverage. Xavier Restrepo (Miami):  5'10", 198 lbs – A tough, shifty slot receiver who excels in short-yardage situations and makes plays after the catch. Kyren Lacy (LSU):  6'2", 215 lbs – A physical presence with excellent contested catch ability and red-zone dominance. Tre Harris (Ole Miss):  6'2", 205 lbs – A versatile WR with great size and burst, capable of thriving in multiple roles within an offense. Savion Williams (TCU):  6'5", 225 lbs – A towering target with a massive catch radius, ideal for contested catches and high-pointing the football. Jalen Royals (Utah State):  6'0", 205 lbs – A balanced receiver with good speed, reliable hands, and a knack for producing big plays. This WR class offers depth and versatility, with prospects available for a variety of offensive schemes, ensuring NFL teams can find high-value players into Day 2 and Day 3.

As Week 12 of the NFL season approaches, managing your fantasy football roster becomes crucial, especially with six teams on bye: the Falcons, Bills, Bengals, Jaguars, Saints, and Jets. Here are some waiver wire targets to consider for bolstering your lineup Quarterbacks: Anthony Richardson, Indianapolis Colts (Rostered: 47%) Richardson showcased his dual-threat capabilities in Week 11, amassing 272 passing yards, 32 rushing yards, and two rushing touchdowns against the Jets. His ability to contribute both through the air and on the ground makes him a valuable addition for teams seeking quarterback depth. Matthew Stafford, Los Angeles Rams (Rostered: 28.3%) Stafford delivered a standout performance in Week 11, throwing for 295 yards and four touchdowns in a victory over the Patriots. This achievement propelled him to 10th place on the NFL's all-time passing touchdowns list. With reliable targets like Cooper Kupp and Puka Nacua, Stafford remains a solid streaming option. Running Backs: Audric Estimé, Denver Broncos (Rostered: 35.6%) Estimé’s impressive 5.68 yards per carry showcase his efficiency and big-play potential. While Javonte Williams leads the backfield, Estimé’s explosive style makes him a viable flex option in favorable matchups. As the Broncos push for the playoffs, his role could expand, offering sneaky value in deeper leagues. Gus Edwards, Los Angeles Chargers (Rostered: 25.7%) Edwards’ solid 4.5 yards per carry highlights his consistency in a split backfield with J.K. Dobbins. With a favorable playoff schedule, including a potential cold-weather matchup against the Patriots in Week 17, Edwards’ physical running style positions him as a valuable stash with upside for late-season production. Wide Receivers: Marquez Valdes-Scantling, New Orleans Saints (Rostered: 13.9%) Marquez Valdes-Scantling has emerged as a significant deep-threat for the New Orleans Saints, amassing 196 yards and three touchdowns over the past two games. His average depth of target (aDOT) stands at 26.6 yards, indicating a high-risk, high-reward profile. While this boom-or-bust nature can lead to variable weekly outputs, his recent surge in production makes him a compelling addition in deeper leagues, especially for managers seeking a high-upside option during the playoff push. Nick Westbrook-Ikhine, Tennessee Titans (Rostered: 1.6%) Westbrook-Ikhine has quietly become a red-zone favorite, scoring in five of his last six games and showcasing big-play ability. Over this stretch, he’s averaging 13.5 PPR points per game, bolstered by a 98-yard touchdown in Week 11. With a favorable schedule against weak secondaries down the stretch, Westbrook-Ikhine is a sneaky stash for managers in need of WR depth or touchdown upside. Tight Ends Taysom Hill, New Orleans Saints (Rostered: 45.6%) Hill’s unique versatility was on full display in Week 11, where he posted three touchdowns, cementing his role as a critical offensive weapon for the Saints. Averaging 17.2 PPR points per game over his last three outings, Hill’s increased usage in goal-line situations and his multi-faceted role make him a high-upside TE1 option, especially in tight end-premium formats. Jonnu Smith, Miami Dolphins (Rostered: 31.4%) Smith’s role in Miami’s offense continues to expand, boasting an efficient 1.98 yards per route run since Tua Tagovailoa’s return. With six targets or more in four of his last five games, Smith is a steady option during a stretch where tight end depth is scarce. His consistency makes him a reliable plug-and-play starter for Week 12 and beyond. Stash Candidates Running Backs Trey Benson (Arizona Cardinals):  Benson’s role is expanding in the Cardinals’ offense. With James Conner’s extensive injury history, Benson offers high-upside potential as the primary backup in a favorable fantasy playoff schedule. Blake Corum (Los Angeles Rams):  Corum's explosiveness makes him a valuable handcuff to Kyren Williams, who has a heavy workload and limited big-play upside. If Williams were to miss time, Corum could step into a significant role. Wide Receivers Ricky Pearsall (San Francisco 49ers):  Pearsall has contingent upside as injuries have plagued the 49ers’ wide receiver depth chart this season. If another starter misses time, Pearsall’s big-play ability could make him a fantasy asset.