Search Results

In the first-ever College Football Playoff game held in December at Ohio Stadium, the No. 8 Ohio State Buckeyes delivered a commanding 42-17 victory over No. 9 Tennessee. The win not only secured the Buckeyes’ spot in the CFP quarterfinals but also set up a highly anticipated rematch against No. 1 Oregon in the Rose Bowl on New Year’s Day. Setting the Tone Early Ohio State wasted no time establishing dominance. Will Howard opened the scoring with a 37-yard touchdown pass to freshman phenom Jeremiah Smith. The Buckeyes followed with a series of explosive plays, including a 29-yard touchdown run by TreVeyon Henderson and a one-yard plunge by Quinshon Judkins. The Buckeyes’ offense executed to near perfection, scoring on their first three drives to race out to a 21-0 lead in the first quarter. “We called this game more aggressively,” said Ohio State head coach Ryan Day. “Our guys were locked in from the start, and it showed.” Tennessee managed to respond with a second-quarter field goal and a two-yard touchdown run by quarterback Nico Iamaleava to make it 21-10 at halftime. However, the Volunteers were unable to carry that momentum into the second half. Will Howard Efficient, Defense Relentless Will Howard led the Buckeyes’ offense with precision, completing 24 of 29 passes for 311 yards and two touchdowns. Jeremiah Smith, the freshman receiver, caught six passes for 103 yards and both of Howard’s touchdown throws, showcasing why he’s one of the most exciting young players in college football. The defense, led by JT Tuimoloau and Jack Sawyer, stifled Tennessee’s offense. The Buckeyes recorded four sacks and held the Volunteers to just 256 total yards, including a meager 104 passing yards. Tuimoloau had two sacks, setting the tone for a defensive front that consistently disrupted Nico Iamaleava’s rhythm. “I got after them at halftime and challenged them,” said Ohio State defensive coordinator Jim Knowles. “Our defense responded and played lights out in the second half.” Ohio State’s secondary, statistically the best in the nation, limited Iamaleava to a season-low 104 passing yards on 14-of-31 completions. Tennessee’s rushing attack, led by Peyton Lewis, was similarly contained, with Lewis managing just 77 yards on 10 carries. Second-Half Dominance Ohio State pulled away in the second half, scoring three unanswered touchdowns. Howard connected with Smith for a 22-yard touchdown early in the third quarter, extending the lead to 28-10. Judkins added his second score of the night, a one-yard run before Henderson sealed the victory with a 24-yard touchdown run in the fourth quarter. The Buckeyes' defense shined in high-pressure moments, including a critical goal-line stand that ended Tennessee’s hopes of a comeback. Tennessee managed a late touchdown from Iamaleava but never seriously threatened Ohio State’s lead. Initial Thoughts vs. Reality Before the game, Tennessee’s balanced offense, led by Iamaleava, was expected to test Ohio State’s defense. However, the Volunteers struggled to sustain drives, averaging just 3.7 yards per play and converting only six of 16 third downs. Ohio State’s defense, which leads the nation in points allowed per game, lived up to its billing by forcing quick stops and limiting explosive plays. Conversely, Ohio State’s offense was pegged to rely on the run game, but it was the passing attack that shined early. Howard’s efficient performance (83% completion rate, 12.7 yards per completion) opened up opportunities for Henderson and Judkins, who combined for 156 rushing yards and four touchdowns. Key Stats Ohio State: Will Howard: 24/29, 311 yards, 2 TD, 1 INT Jeremiah Smith: 6 receptions, 103 yards, 2 TD TreVeyon Henderson: 10 carries, 80 yards, 2 TD Quinshon Judkins: 10 carries, 34 yards, 2 TD Defense: 4 sacks, 6 tackles for loss, 256 total yards allowed Tennessee: Nico Iamaleava: 14/31, 104 yards, 0 TD, 0 INT; 20 carries, 47 yards, 2 TD Peyton Lewis: 10 carries, 77 yards Total Offense: 256 yards What’s Next? Ohio State now turns its attention to No. 1 Oregon, the undefeated Big Ten champions. The rematch will take place in the Rose Bowl on New Year’s Day, with the Buckeyes seeking redemption after a heartbreaking 32-31 loss to the Ducks earlier this season. For Tennessee, the season ends with a 10-3 record and valuable lessons learned from their first CFP appearance. Head coach Josh Heupel will look to build on this experience as the Volunteers aim to remain contenders in the years to come. “This is a step forward for our program,” Heupel said. “We didn’t get the result we wanted tonight, but we’ll be back.”

In the first round of the expanded College Football Playoff, No. 5 Texas capitalized on a dominant rushing performance and key defensive stops to defeat No. 12 Clemson 38-24 in front of a packed crowd at Darrell K. Royal-Texas Memorial Stadium in Austin. The Longhorns (12-2) now advance to the Peach Bowl, where they will face No. 4 Arizona State. Setting the Tone with the Ground Game Texas leaned heavily on its running game, amassing 292 yards on the ground at an impressive 6.1 yards per carry. Jaydon Blue led the charge with 146 yards and two touchdowns, including a game-sealing 77-yard sprint in the fourth quarter that put the Longhorns up 38-24. “Once I got past the line, I just kept running. I knew they weren’t going to catch me,” Blue said of his electrifying run. Quintrevion Wisner complemented Blue’s effort with 110 yards and two first-half touchdowns, helping Texas establish control early. Ewers Efficient, Defense Stands Tall Quarterback Quinn Ewers delivered a poised performance, completing 17 of 24 passes for 202 yards and a touchdown. His first-half precision, highlighted by a 43-yard connection with Matthew Golden and a 19-yard touchdown pass to tight end Gunnar Helm, helped Texas build a commanding 28-10 halftime lead. Ewers’ ability to spread the ball efficiently kept Clemson’s defense on its heels and played a crucial role in the Longhorns' offensive success. On the defensive side, Texas faced a strong challenge from Clemson quarterback Cade Klubnik, who threw for 336 yards and three touchdowns while completing 60% of his passes. Despite Klubnik’s late-game surge that cut Texas’ lead to 31-24, the Longhorns' defense delivered when it mattered most. A critical goal-line stand in the fourth quarter, featuring back-to-back stops at the 1-yard line, extinguished Clemson’s comeback hopes. Texas also tallied three sacks and seven tackles for loss, disrupting Clemson’s offensive rhythm and limiting their run game to just 76 yards on 24 attempts (3.2 yards per carry). “Our defense has been our backbone all year, and they showed up again tonight when we needed them most,” Texas head coach Steve Sarkisian said. Initial Thoughts vs. Reality Before the game, Clemson’s passing attack, led by Klubnik, was expected to challenge Texas' defense. While Klubnik showcased his talent with 336 passing yards and three touchdowns, the Longhorns’ ability to stifle Clemson’s run game and deliver timely defensive stops ultimately swung the game in Texas’ favor. Clemson’s reliance on the pass made their offense predictable, allowing Texas to key in on crucial late-game situations. On the other hand, Texas’ rushing attack, identified pregame as a potential advantage, surpassed expectations. The Longhorns ran for 292 yards on 48 carries, averaging 6.1 yards per attempt. Jaydon Blue was electric with 146 yards and two touchdowns, including a game-sealing 77-yard burst in the fourth quarter. Quintrevion Wisner contributed 110 yards and two scores, while the offensive line consistently overpowered Clemson’s defensive front. Texas' dominant ground game not only controlled the tempo but also exposed Clemson's defensive weaknesses, cementing the Longhorns' victory. Key Stats Texas: Jaydon Blue:  146 rushing yards, 2 TDs Quintrevion Wisner:  110 rushing yards, 2 TDs Quinn Ewers:  17/24, 202 yards, 1 TD Gunnar Helm:  6 receptions, 77 yards, 1 TD Clemson: Cade Klubnik:  26/43, 336 yards, 3 TDs, 1 INT Rushing Offense:  76 yards (3.2 YPC) T.J. Moore:  7 receptions, 91 yards, 1 TD What’s Next? Texas moves on to face No. 4 Arizona State in the Peach Bowl on New Year’s Day. The Longhorns will look to build on their dominant rushing performance as they aim for a spot in the semifinals. For Clemson, the season ends with questions about its defensive front and how head coach Dabo Swinney can address the team’s struggles against physical rushing attacks. Despite the loss, the Tigers made strides in returning to the College Football Playoff and will look to build on this momentum next season. In the first-ever on-campus CFP matchup for Texas, the Longhorns showcased their offensive firepower and defensive resilience, propelling them one step closer to a national championship.

In the first round of the College Football Playoff, No. 6 Penn State showcased its dominance on both sides of the ball, crushing No. 11 SMU 38-3 at Beaver Stadium. The Nittany Lions relied on a stifling defense, including two first-half pick-sixes and a powerful ground game, to secure the victory and advance to face No. 3 Boise State in the Fiesta Bowl. Setting the Tone Early Penn State’s defense made a statement from the outset, with linebacker Dominic DeLuca intercepting SMU quarterback Kevin Jennings on the Mustangs’ opening drive. DeLuca returned the interception 23 yards for a touchdown, giving the Nittany Lions an early 7-0 lead. Jennings’ struggles continued later in the first quarter, throwing another interception to Tony Rojas, who returned it 59 yards for Penn State’s second defensive touchdown. These turnovers gave Penn State a commanding 14-0 lead and set the tone for the rest of the game. Defensive Dominance Penn State’s defense was relentless, forcing three interceptions and holding SMU to just 218 total yards. The Mustangs, known for their high-powered offense led by Jennings and running back Brashard Smith, were unable to find a rhythm. Smith was limited to 43 yards on 17 carries, and SMU’s offense failed to reach the end zone. The Nittany Lions tallied 10 tackles for loss and sacked Jennings three times, with linebacker Abdul Carter leading the charge. SMU’s best opportunity came in the third quarter when they drove into the red zone but were forced to settle for a field goal after multiple penalties stalled their momentum. Ground Game Fuels Nittany Lions On offense, Penn State leaned heavily on its running backs. Kaytron Allen rushed for 85 yards and two touchdowns, including a 25-yard score in the second quarter that extended the lead to 21-0. Nicholas Singleton added 66 yards and a touchdown as the Nittany Lions averaged 5.6 yards per carry. Quarterback Drew Allar managed the game efficiently, completing 13 of 23 passes for 127 yards. While the passing attack didn’t produce any touchdowns, it complemented the ground game and controlled the clock, keeping SMU’s offense off the field. Initial Thoughts vs. Reality The pre-game analysis highlighted the matchup between SMU’s explosive offense and Penn State’s elite defense. The Nittany Lions’ defense delivered far beyond expectations, holding SMU to a single field goal and scoring two defensive touchdowns. Kevin Jennings, who entered the game with just eight interceptions on the season, threw three in the first half alone. Penn State’s offensive strategy also matched predictions, as they exploited SMU’s undersized linebackers and controlled the game through their running attack. SMU’s inability to handle Penn State’s physicality in the trenches was a decisive factor. *Please note I compiled the final stats for this article with 10 minutes to go in the 4th QTR of a 38-3 game. Key Stats Penn State: Kaytron Allen: 13 carries, 85 yards, 2 TDs Nicholas Singleton: 10 carries, 66 yards, 1 TD Dominic DeLuca: 2 INTs, 1 returned for a touchdown Tony Rojas: 1 INT, 1 returned for a touchdown SMU: Kevin Jennings: 17 of 33, 158 yards, 3 INTs Brashard Smith: 17 carries, 43 yards Total Yards: 218 What’s Next? Penn State advances to the Fiesta Bowl, where they will face No. 3 Boise State on New Year’s Eve. The Nittany Lions will look to maintain their momentum, particularly on defense, as they prepare to face a balanced Boise State offense. For SMU, the loss caps a successful 11-3 season, but their inability to match Penn State’s physicality in the trenches exposed areas for improvement. With a young core led by Jennings and Smith, the Mustangs will aim to build on their playoff experience moving forward. Penn State’s commanding victory underscores their playoff credentials and sets the stage for what promises to be an intriguing quarterfinal matchup.

In the first on-campus College Football Playoff game in history, No. 7 Notre Dame delivered a commanding 27-17 victory over No. 10 Indiana, propelled by a record-setting performance from running back Jeremiah Love and a suffocating defensive effort. The Fighting Irish (12-1) showcased the dominant physicality and defensive prowess that fueled their 11-game win streak, while Indiana’s (11-2) magical season ended under the weight of Notre Dame’s relentless attack. With the win, Marcus Freeman’s team advances to face SEC champion Georgia in the Sugar Bowl, taking one step closer to a national title. Setting the Tone Early On Notre Dame’s third play from scrimmage, Jeremiyah Love broke loose for a 98-yard touchdown run, tying the school record set in 2015 and marking the longest run in CFP history. Love’s sprint gave Notre Dame an immediate 7-0 lead and electrified the crowd at Notre Dame Stadium, where snowflakes danced in the brisk December air. “I was looking up at the video board — he wasn’t going to catch me,” Love said. Although Love reinjured his knee in the first half, his eight-carry, 108-yard performance set the tone for Notre Dame’s offense. The Irish controlled the trenches early, capitalizing on their offensive line’s strength against an Indiana defense that had been one of the nation’s best at limiting rushing yards before contact. A Defensive Clinic Notre Dame’s defense lived up to its reputation, neutralizing Indiana’s balanced offense from the opening whistle. Xavier Watts intercepted Indiana quarterback Kurtis Rourke on the Hoosiers’ first drive, setting the stage for a dominant defensive effort. Rourke, who entered the game with one of the nation’s top passing grades, struggled under constant pressure from Notre Dame’s front seven. He finished 20 of 33 for 215 yards with two late touchdowns, one interception, and minimal support from a ground game that managed just 63 rushing yards. “They took it to us,” Indiana coach Curt Cignetti said. “Their defense suffocated our offense until the last 1:50 or whatever.” Notre Dame’s defense, ranked among the best in the nation, held Indiana’s high-scoring offense to a single field goal until the final two minutes. Leonard’s Leadership Shines Notre Dame quarterback Riley Leonard rebounded from an early interception to deliver a composed performance. He accounted for two touchdowns—one passing, one rushing—and managed the game efficiently, finishing with 201 passing yards and 30 rushing yards. Leonard’s fourth-quarter touchdown run broke the school’s single-season record for rushing touchdowns by a quarterback, further cementing his status as a leader of this playoff-bound team. “We’re just trying to stay alive and play as many games as we can,” Leonard said. “This is why I came here—to play for a [national] championship.” Initial Thoughts vs. Reality Before the game, Notre Dame’s ability to dominate the trenches with their rushing attack and defense was seen as the key to victory. That prediction proved accurate, as Love’s early touchdown and the defense’s smothering performance dictated the game’s outcome. Indiana’s balanced offense, led by Kurtis Rourke and running back Jaylin Lucas, was expected to challenge Notre Dame’s defense. However, the Hoosiers’ struggles in the run game (63 yards) and inability to handle Notre Dame’s pass rush left them unable to mount a consistent attack. The implied score of 27-21 closely mirrored the final result of 27-17, but Notre Dame’s defense outperformed expectations by holding Indiana to 17 points—most of which came in garbage time. Key Stats Notre Dame: Jeremiah Love: 8 carries, 108 yards, 1 TD (98-yard run) Riley Leonard: 23 of 32, 201 passing yards, 1 TD, 1 INT; 30 rushing yards, 1 TD Xavier Watts: 1 INT, 3 tackles Indiana: Kurtis Rourke: 20 of 33, 215 yards, 2 TD, 1 INT Rushing Offense: 63 yards (3.0 YPC) Mikail Kamara: 1 sack, 4 pressures What’s Next? Notre Dame will face No. 2 Georgia in the Sugar Bowl on New Year’s Day, looking to advance to the CFP semifinals and keep their national championship hopes alive. With their defense firing on all cylinders and a potent rushing attack, the Irish are poised to challenge the Bulldogs. For Indiana, the loss caps an incredible turnaround season under first-year head coach Curt Cignetti. While falling short of the ultimate goal, the Hoosiers set a single-season school record for wins and re-established themselves as a program on the rise. “No one’s as disappointed as I am, but this team accomplished things no other Indiana team did,” Cignetti said. As the snowflakes settled over South Bend, Notre Dame celebrated not just a win, but a historic moment in their storied program—a victory that could propel them to even greater heights.

No. 11 SMU Mustangs at No. 6 Penn State Nittany Lions (Saturday, 12 PM EST on TNT/Max) SMU’s high-powered offense, led by QB Kevin Jennings and RB Brashard Smith, presents a significant challenge for Penn State’s defense. Can Penn State Contain SMU’s Dynamic Offense? SMU’s high-powered offense, led by QB Kevin Jennings and RB Brashard Smith, presents a significant challenge for Penn State’s defense. Jennings has been outstanding against single-high coverages, posting a 90.5 passing grade, while Smith is among the most versatile backs in the nation. Penn State’s defense, known for its elite pass rush and strong linebacker play, must rise to the occasion. Penn State, meanwhile, will look to lean on its physicality, especially in the trenches, to wear down SMU. If the Nittany Lions can dominate on both sides of the line of scrimmage, they should have the upper hand. Three Keys for Penn State to Win 1. Control the Line of Scrimmage Penn State’s offensive line must open up lanes for their running backs and give Drew Allar time to find his receivers. The Nittany Lions’ rushing attack will need to exploit SMU’s undersized linebackers, who struggle against downhill runs. 2. Lean on Tyler Warren Tight end Tyler Warren has been the Nittany Lions’ most reliable offensive weapon, leading all Power Four tight ends in receptions and yards. Warren must have a big game against SMU’s safeties, who rank among the best in the nation. 3. Pressure Kevin Jennings Penn State’s pass rush, led by Abdul Carter and Dani Dennis-Sutton, must disrupt Jennings’ timing. The Nittany Lions cannot allow SMU’s quarterback to get comfortable in the pocket, especially against single-high coverage schemes. Key NFL Draft Prospect to Watch for Penn State: Abdul Carter, EDGE Carter is a projected top-10 pick in the 2025 NFL Draft, known for his relentless motor and game-wrecking ability. His impact as both a pass rusher and run defender will be crucial to Penn State’s success. Three Keys for SMU to Win 1. Win the Perimeter Matchups SMU’s wide receivers must take advantage of Penn State’s occasional lapses in single-high coverage. Kevin Jennings has thrived against such schemes, and the Mustangs will need big plays through the air to stay competitive. 2. Get Brashard Smith in Space Smith, one of the nation’s most dynamic backs, must be utilized effectively in both the run and passing game. Penn State has been vulnerable on outside runs, which SMU can exploit with Smith’s speed and versatility. 3. Hold Up in the Trenches SMU’s offensive line must protect Jennings and create running lanes against Penn State’s ferocious defensive front. A clean pocket and a balanced offensive attack are critical for the Mustangs to keep pace. Key NFL Draft Prospect to Watch for SMU: Brashard Smith, RB Smith, with a 91.2 PFF grade, is one of the most versatile offensive weapons in the nation. His ability to create explosive plays both as a runner and receiver will be vital to SMU’s chances. Current Odds and Prediction Penn State:  -10.5 Implied Game Total:  50 Points The predicted final score is approximately 31-21  in favor of Penn State. The Nittany Lions’ defense, led by Abdul Carter, is expected to disrupt SMU’s offensive rhythm. Offensively, Tyler Warren and the Penn State ground game should find success against the Mustangs' undersized front seven. While SMU’s explosive offense poses a significant threat, Penn State’s physicality and home-field advantage give the Nittany Lions the edge in this intriguing first-round matchup.

No. 12 Clemson Tigers at No. 5 Texas Longhorns (Saturday, 4 PM EST on TNT/Max) Texas’ elite rushing attack and defensive front should overwhelm Clemson, whose edge defense and interior offensive line are a weakness. Can Clemson Contain Texas’ Explosive Outside Zone Rushing Attack? The No. 5 Texas Longhorns (11-2) narrowly missed a first-round bye after an overtime loss to Georgia in the SEC Championship, while No. 12 Clemson (10-3) earned the final playoff seed with a dramatic win over SMU in the ACC Championship. Texas brings a potent rushing attack and elite defense into the matchup, while Clemson relies heavily on the playmaking ability of QB Cade Klubnik. With the winner advancing to face No. 4 Arizona State in the quarterfinals, the stakes couldn’t be higher for these two storied programs. Three Keys for Texas to Win 1. Exploit Clemson’s Weakness on Outside Runs Texas has a dominant offensive line anchored by Kelvin Banks Jr. and Cameron Williams, who thrive in outside zone concepts. Clemson has struggled to contain outside runs, allowing 6.0 yards per carry on those plays, the sixth-worst in the Power Four. Texas needs to lean on this advantage and create explosive plays on the ground with Quintrevion Wisner and Jaydon Blue. 2. Dominate on Defense Texas boasts the best defense in college football, ranking first in coverage grade (92.9) and third in pass-rushing grade (90.2). The Longhorns must pressure Cade Klubnik and force him into mistakes while shutting down Clemson’s interior rushing attack. 3. Avoid Turnovers Quinn Ewers and the Texas offense have been susceptible to turnovers in key games. Keeping the ball secure and avoiding momentum-shifting plays will be critical against a Clemson defense that thrives on creating takeaways. Key NFL Draft Prospect to Watch for Texas: Kelvin Banks Jr., OT A potential top-10 pick, Banks excels in both pass protection and run blocking. His ability to neutralize Clemson’s edge rushers and pave the way for outside runs will be crucial for Texas’ success. Three Keys for Clemson to Win 1. Cade Klubnik Must Be Elite Klubnik has proven he can make big plays, ranking eighth among FBS quarterbacks with an 87.5 passing grade. Against Texas’ top-ranked defense, he must rise to the occasion and deliver a near-perfect performance. 2. Shore Up the Edge Defense Clemson’s edge rushers have struggled to contain outside zone runs, but this must change against Texas. Players like T.J. Parker and Jaheim Lawson need to step up to prevent Texas from dominating on the perimeter. 3. Win the Turnover Battle Clemson has a knack for creating turnovers in high-stakes games, and that could be the equalizer against a more talented Texas team. Short fields and game-changing plays are essential for the Tigers to pull off the upset. Key NFL Draft Prospect to Watch for Clemson: Cade Klubnik, QB The engine of Clemson’s offense, Klubnik’s dual-threat ability, and decision-making under pressure will be pivotal. If he can exploit Texas’ defense and avoid mistakes, Clemson has a chance to keep the game competitive. Current Odds and Prediction Texas:  -11.5 Implied Game Total:  51.5 Points Predicted Score: Texas 31, Clemson 20 Texas’ elite rushing attack and defensive front should overwhelm Clemson, whose edge defense and interior offensive line are glaring weaknesses. While Cade Klubnik has the talent to keep Clemson competitive, the Tigers will struggle to score consistently against Texas’ top-tier defense. The Longhorns take care of business at home and advance to the Peach Bowl to face Arizona State.

No. 10 Indiana Hoosiers at No. 7 Notre Dame Fighting Irish (Friday, 8 PM EST on ABC/ESPN) Notre Dame’s elite rushing attack has carried the team all season, but Indiana’s defense presents its toughest challenge yet. Can Notre Dame’s Ground Game Dominate Indiana’s Stout Defense? Notre Dame’s elite rushing attack has carried the team all season, but Indiana’s defense presents its toughest challenge yet. The Fighting Irish rank third in the FBS in rushing EPA and lead Power Four teams with 6.7 yards per carry. However, Indiana’s defense allows only 3.7 yards per attempt and leads the nation in yards before contact allowed (0.8). The battle between Notre Dame’s offensive line and Indiana’s physical front seven will likely determine the game. If Notre Dame can establish the run, it will control the tempo. But if Indiana can force Riley Leonard into third-and-long situations, the Hoosiers could have a chance to pull off the upset. Three Keys for Notre Dame to Win 1. Dominate on the Ground Notre Dame’s rushing attack, led by Jeremiyah Love and quarterback Riley Leonard, has been the backbone of their offense. The Fighting Irish must control the clock and wear down Indiana’s defense to dictate the pace of the game. 2. Force Kurtis Rourke into Mistakes Notre Dame’s pass rush and secondary must pressure Indiana QB Kurtis Rourke, who thrives under pressure with a nation-leading 87.0 PFF passing grade. Generating turnovers will be critical for Notre Dame to prevent Indiana’s explosive offense from finding rhythm. 3. Win the Trenches on Defense Notre Dame’s defensive line needs to stifle Indiana’s rushing attack and force the Hoosiers into obvious passing situations. A dominant performance in the trenches could limit Indiana’s balanced offense. Key NFL Draft Prospect to Watch for Notre Dame: Xavier Watts, Safety Watts is a ball-hawking safety with a 30.4 passer rating allowed and an 85.6 PFF grade . His ability to shut down passing lanes and force turnovers could be pivotal in neutralizing Indiana’s offense. Three Keys for Indiana to Win 1. Disrupt Notre Dame’s Offense Indiana’s standout edge rusher Mikail Kamara must lead the charge. With 60 pressures (2nd in the nation) and an 89.2 PFF grade, Kamara can disrupt Notre Dame’s ground game and force Riley Leonard into difficult throws under duress. 2. Protect Kurtis Rourke Indiana’s offensive line must hold up against Notre Dame’s pass rush to give Rourke time to operate. Rourke is second among FBS QBs with a 91.8 passing grade, but he needs a clean pocket to connect with his receivers. 3. Limit Big Plays on Defense Indiana’s zone-heavy defense has excelled at preventing explosive plays. They must bottle up Notre Dame’s three-headed rushing attack and force Leonard to beat them through the air, where he has struggled against zone coverage. Key NFL Draft Prospect to Watch for Indiana: Mikail Kamara, EDGE Kamara is the centerpiece of Indiana’s defense, combining explosiveness and versatility to wreak havoc on opposing offenses. A game-changing performance from him could swing the outcome in Indiana’s favor. Current Odds and Prediction Notre Dame:  -8 Implied Game Total:  48 Points The predicted final score is approximately 27-21  in favor of Notre Dame. The Fighting Irish’s dominant ground game, combined with their home-field advantage, makes them the favorite. However, Indiana’s elite pass defense and big-play ability on offense give them a legitimate chance to pull off the upset if they can control the line of scrimmage and limit mistakes. This game is a true clash of styles, with Notre Dame’s methodical rushing attack battling Indiana’s balanced offensive firepower and stout defensive front.

No. 9 Tennessee Volunteers at No. 8 Ohio State Buckeyes (Saturday, 8 PM EST on ABC/ESPN) Ohio State’s weakened O-line must contain Tennessee’s top pass rush, or Tennessee will wreak havoc on Will Howard. Can Ohio State’s offensive line hold up Against The Vols' Tough Defensive Line? Ohio State’s offensive line has struggled significantly since the loss of star left tackle Josh Simmons and center Seth McLaughlin to season-ending injuries. Their pass-blocking grade ranks 128th in the FBS since Week 7, leaving QB Will Howard vulnerable in the pocket. Tennessee’s defense, led by James Pearce Jr., ranks 12th in pass-rushing grade and 11th in pressure rate, creating a massive challenge for the Buckeyes' depleted offensive line. If Ohio State can find a way to protect Howard and allow him time to distribute the ball to their elite receiving corps, the Buckeyes could find success. But if Tennessee’s defensive front dominates, it could be a long night for the Buckeyes' offense. Three Keys for Tennessee to Win 1. Dominate the Line of Scrimmage on Defense Tennessee’s defensive front is one of the nation’s best, spearheaded by James Pearce Jr. The Volunteers need to exploit Ohio State’s weakened offensive line to generate consistent pressure on Will Howard. Forcing hurried throws or sacks will keep Ohio State’s passing attack out of rhythm. 2. Establish the Ground Game Tennessee’s rushing attack, led by Dylan Sampson, needs to control the clock and keep Ohio State’s defense on the field. Sampson, who boasts a 90.7 PFF rushing grade, must find success against a Buckeyes defense that ranks fourth in run defense grade. 3. Limit Explosive Plays Ohio State thrives on big plays, particularly through the air with receivers like Emeka Egbuka and freshman Jeremiah Smith. Tennessee’s secondary, led by Jermod McCoy, must stay disciplined and avoid giving up deep shots that can change the game’s momentum. Key NFL Draft Prospect to Watch for Tennessee: James Pearce Jr., EDGE Pearce is a potential first-round pick with an elite 89.6 pass-rush grade and the top pressure rate among all FBS edge defenders. He has the ability to single-handedly disrupt Ohio State’s passing game. Three Keys for Ohio State to Win 1. Protect Will Howard The offensive line must find a way to slow down Tennessee’s pass rush. Utilizing quick passes, play action, and creative protection schemes will be essential to giving Howard the time he needs to find his elite wideouts. 2. Control the Defensive Line Ohio State’s defense must stop Dylan Sampson and the Volunteers’ ground game. If the Buckeyes can dominate the trenches and force Tennessee into third-and-long situations, they can dictate the flow of the game. 3. Exploit Tennessee’s Secondary With Tennessee focusing on pressuring the quarterback, Ohio State needs to lean on Emeka Egbuka and Jeremiah Smith to win their matchups. Howard must be precise and quick in his reads to capitalize on any openings in the Volunteers' secondary. Key NFL Draft Prospect to Watch for Ohio State: Emeka Egbuka, WR Egbuka is a polished route runner and a top target for Will Howard. With elite hands and the ability to create separation, Egbuka could exploit Tennessee’s secondary and be the difference-maker for Ohio State. Current Odds and Prediction Ohio State:  -7.5 to -8 Implied Game Total:  46-47 Points The predicted final score is approximately 27-20 in favor of Ohio State, reflecting the 7.5-point spread and 46.5-point over/under. Ohio State’s top-ranked defense, allowing only 10.9 points per game, and their home-field advantage at Ohio Stadium underpin their favored status. Tennessee’s offense, while averaging 37.3 points per game, has struggled against elite defenses like Georgia and Alabama, managing just 20.5 points per game in those contests. The implied total suggests a game driven by strong defensive performances, with Tennessee’s pass rush expected to challenge Ohio State’s offensive line while Ohio State’s playmakers exploit key opportunities to secure a hard-fought victory.

The expanded 12-team College Football Playoff offers NFL Scouts an extra data point for evaluation, showcasing talent on the grandest stage in a tournament setting. Below is a detailed analysis of the top players from each team, including all names referenced in the original content, regardless of their ranking. Ranking the NFL Draft Talent in the College Football Playoff: Georgia, Ohio State, and Oregon Lead the Way Based on our list of draft prospects, the Georgia Bulldogs  emerge as the team with the most NFL Draft talent, boasting 12 players  across all positions. Headlined by top-tier players like EDGE Mykel Williams, S Malaki Starks, and LB Jalon Walker, Georgia features an average projected draft round of 3.65 , showcasing depth at multiple positions with players ranging from first-round picks to late-round developmental talent. The Ohio State Buckeyes  rank second with 11 players , featuring key names such as WR Emeka Egbuka, CB Denzel Burke, and IDL Tyleik Williams, all projected as early-round selections. Ohio State’s players average a 2.41 draft round , making them the most top-heavy team in terms of early-round talent among the playoff contenders. In third place, the Oregon Ducks  bring 9 players  to the table, led by IDL Derrick Harmon and OT Josh Conerly Jr., who are projected to go in the first three rounds. Oregon’s players average a draft round of 3.72 , highlighting a solid mix of mid-round prospects and developmental talent. These three programs dominate the College Football Playoff field in terms of NFL Draft talent, each showcasing the pipeline strength to the next level. 2025 NFL Draft Prospects to Watch 1). Oregon Ducks IDL Derrick Harmon:  Powerful run defender with solid hand technique and block-shedding ability. Projected Draft Round: 1-2 OT Josh Conerly Jr.:  Athletic tackle with quick feet and potential as a long-term blindside protector. Projected Draft Round: 2-3 WR Evan Stewart:  Dynamic receiver with excellent route-running and separation skills. Projected Draft Round: 3-4 EDGE Jordan Burch:  Versatile edge rusher with size and power to excel in multiple defensive schemes. Projected Draft Round: 3-4 WR Tez Johnson:  Speedy slot receiver with strong hands and yards-after-catch ability. Projected Draft Round: 3-4 CB Jabbar Muhammad:  Agile cover corner with good ball skills and instincts in zone coverage. Projected Draft Round: 4-5 OT Ajani Cornelius:  Physical right tackle with strong run-blocking ability and a nasty streak. Projected Draft Round: 4-5 QB Dillon Gabriel:  Accurate passer with quick decision-making and mobility to extend plays. Projected Draft Round: 4-6 LB Jeffrey Bassa:  Versatile linebacker with sideline-to-sideline range and special teams upside. Projected Draft Round: 5 2). Georgia Bulldogs EDGE Mykel Williams:  Explosive edge rusher with elite bend and hand usage, making him a disruptive force off the edge. Projected Draft Round: 1 (top ten) S Malaki Starks:  Versatile safety with exceptional range, ball skills, and physicality in run support. Projected Draft Round: 1 (top 15) LB Jalon Walker:  Athletic linebacker with sideline-to-sideline range and advanced instincts in coverage. Projected Draft Round: 1 QB Carson Beck:  Accurate pocket passer with good mechanics and the ability to process defenses quickly. Projected Draft Round: 2-3 IOL Tate Ratledge:  Physical interior lineman with excellent run-blocking power and consistent technique. Projected Draft Round: 3-4 OT Earnest Greene:  Strong and reliable offensive tackle with a sturdy anchor in pass protection. Projected Draft Round: 3-4 CB Daylen Everette:  Fluid cornerback with quick feet, good recovery speed, and strong press technique. Projected Draft Round: 3-4 IDL Nazir Stackhouse:  Stout defensive lineman with the ability to clog lanes and generate interior pressure. Projected Draft Round: 4-5 LB Smael Mondon Jr.:  Versatile linebacker with great pursuit speed and strong tackling fundamentals. Projected Draft Round: 5-6 TE Oscar Delp (Georgia):  Versatile tight end with great size, reliable hands, and strong blocking skills in both run and pass protection. Projected Draft Round: 6-7 RB Trevor Etienne (Georgia):  Explosive runner with elite acceleration, vision, and versatility as a pass-catcher out of the backfield. Projected Draft Round: 6-7 TE Benjamin Yurosek (Georgia):  Athletic tight end with smooth route-running, excellent hands, and the ability to create mismatches in the passing game. Projected Draft Round: 7 3). Boise State Broncos RB Ashton Jeanty:  Dynamic dual-threat running back with elite vision, balance, and explosiveness. Projected Draft Round: 1 (top 20) 4. Arizona State Sun Devils RB Cam Skattebo:  Powerful and compact runner with excellent contact balance and production as a between-the-tackles grinder. Projected Draft Round: 5-6 WR Jordyn Tyson (injured):  Explosive deep threat with strong hands and playmaking ability when healthy. Projected Draft Round: NA QB Sam Leavitt:  Athletic quarterback with a quick release and intriguing dual-threat potential. Projected Draft Round: NA 5). Texas Longhorns OT Kelvin Banks:  Elite tackle prospect with exceptional footwork, technique, and versatility to play on either side of the line. Projected Draft Round: 1 (top 10) OT Cameron Williams:  Massive tackle with excellent power and potential as a dominant run-blocker. Projected Draft Round: 1-2 WR Isaiah Bond:  Speedy and explosive receiver with strong separation skills and big-play ability. Projected Draft Round: 1-2 QB Quinn Ewers:  Talented passer with a quick release, excellent arm strength, and a knack for making plays under pressure. Projected Draft Round: 2-3 CB Jahdae Barron:  Physical cornerback with great instincts, tackling ability, and playmaking in the secondary. Projected Draft Round: 2 IDL Alfred Collins:  Disruptive interior lineman with a quick first step and the ability to collapse the pocket. Projected Draft Round: 2-3 TE Gunnar Helm:  Reliable tight end with strong hands, solid blocking ability, and versatility in offensive schemes. Projected Draft Round: 3-4 S Andrew Mukuba:  Rangy safety with good instincts, coverage versatility, and effectiveness as a blitzer. Projected Draft Round: 3-4 6). Penn State Nittany Lions EDGE Abdul Carter:  Explosive pass rusher with excellent athleticism, bend, and a relentless motor off the edge. Projected Draft Round: 1 (top 15) TE Tyler Warren:  Versatile tight end with strong hands, great route-running ability, and consistent production in the passing game. Projected Draft Round: 2 QB Drew Allar:  Big-armed quarterback with good pocket presence and the ability to make plays at all levels of the field. Projected Draft Round: 2-3 EDGE Dani Dennis-Sutton:  High-upside edge rusher with great length, burst, and the versatility to fit multiple defensive schemes. Projected Draft Round: 2-3 S Kevin Winston Jr. (injured):  Intelligent safety with strong instincts and tackling ability in both run and pass defense. Projected Draft Round: 3-4 RB Nick Singleton:  Powerful and dynamic runner with home-run ability and a knack for making defenders miss. Projected Draft Round: 3-4 7). Notre Dame Fighting Irish CB Benjamin Morrison (injured):  Technically sound cornerback with elite instincts, ball skills, and physicality in coverage. Projected Draft Round: 1-2 S Xavier Watts:  Playmaking safety with excellent range, ball-hawking ability, and physicality in run support. Projected Draft Round: 2-3 TE Mitchell Evans:  Reliable tight end with strong hands, excellent blocking ability, and a knack for making contested catches. Projected Draft Round: 4-5 IDL Howard Cross III:  High-motor interior lineman with great leverage, quick hands, and effectiveness against the run. Projected Draft Round: 4-5 IDL Rylie Mills:  Powerful defensive lineman with versatility to play across the line and strong upside as a pass rusher. Projected Draft Round: 4-5 QB Riley Leonard:  Mobile quarterback with a quick release, solid mechanics, and dual-threat ability to extend plays. Projected Draft Round: 6-7 LB Jack Kiser:  Intelligent and instinctive linebacker with reliable tackling and effectiveness in zone coverage. Projected Draft Round: NA 8). Ohio State Buckeyes WR Emeka Egbuka:  Smooth route-runner with elite separation skills, strong hands, and playmaking ability after the catch. Projected Draft Round: 1-2 OT Josh Simmons (injured):  Physical tackle with good size and potential as a developmental pass protector. Projected Draft Round: 1-2 CB Denzel Burke:  Shutdown corner with excellent footwork, instincts, and ball skills in man coverage. Projected Draft Round: 1-2 IDL Tyleik Williams:  Explosive interior defender with a quick first step and the ability to generate consistent penetration. Projected Draft Round: 1-2 EDGE J.T. Tuimoloau:  Versatile edge rusher with excellent power, athleticism, and the ability to impact both the run and pass game. Projected Draft Round: 2 RB Quinshon Judkins:  Physical runner with elite contact balance, vision, and home-run speed. Projected Draft Round: 2-3 RB TreVeyon Henderson:  Explosive three-down back with great acceleration, versatility, and pass-catching ability. Projected Draft Round: 3 EDGE Jack Sawyer:  High-upside pass rusher with great length, motor, and developing technical skills. Projected Draft Round: 2-3 IOL Donovan Jackson:  Powerful interior lineman with advanced run-blocking ability and solid pass-protection technique. Projected Draft Round: 2-3 CB Davison Igbinosun:  Long and physical corner with great recovery speed and upside in press coverage. Projected Draft Round: 3-4 S Lathan Ransom:  Reliable safety with good instincts, tackling ability, and versatility in coverage. Projected Draft Round: 3-4 9) Tennessee Volunteers EDGE James Pearce Jr.:  Explosive pass rusher with great size, speed, and the ability to disrupt the backfield consistently. Projected Draft Round: 1 (top 20) IDL Omarr Norman-Lott:  Powerful interior lineman with excellent hand usage and the ability to collapse the pocket. Projected Draft Round: 2-3 RB Dylan Sampson:  Versatile runner with strong vision, elusiveness, and a knack for finding the end zone. Projected Draft Round: 3-4 10) Indiana Hoosiers EDGE Mikail Kamara:  High-motor edge rusher with quickness and solid production as a pass rusher. Projected Draft Round: 2-3 IDL CJ West:  Strong and athletic interior defender with solid gap control and potential as a disruptive run stopper. Projected Draft Round: 3-4 QB Kurtis Rourke:  Smart and accurate passer with good decision-making and ability to lead a balanced offense. Projected Draft Round: 5-6 LB Jailin Walker (Indiana):  Versatile linebacker with solid tackling fundamentals, good sideline-to-sideline range, and upside as a coverage defender. Projected Draft Round: NA 11) SMU Mustangs QB Kevin Jennings:  Dual-threat quarterback with strong leadership qualities and the ability to create plays off-script. Projected Draft Round: NA RB Brashard Smith:  Productive runner with quick acceleration and good receiving skills out of the backfield. Projected Draft Round: NA 12) Clemson Tigers LB Barrett Carter:  Explosive linebacker with excellent range, instincts, and ability to contribute in coverage and run defense. Projected Draft Round: 2-3 IDL DeMonte Capehart:  Physical interior defender with good strength and the ability to anchor against the run. Projected Draft Round: 2-3 OT Blake Miller:  Reliable offensive tackle with strong fundamentals in pass protection and run blocking. Projected Draft Round: 3-4 TE Jake Briningstool:  Athletic tight end with excellent route-running, strong hands, and the ability to stretch the field vertically. Projected Draft Round: 5-6 QB Cade Klubnik:  Accurate and poised quarterback with quick decision-making, solid mechanics, and the ability to extend plays under pressure. Projected Draft Round: NA

Each year, the NFL Draft showcases a handful of under-the-radar, hidden gem prospects—players with untapped potential who are often overlooked in the pre-draft spotlight. The 2025 NFL Draft is no exception, offering a deep pool of talent just waiting to be discovered. Today, we’re featuring one such prospect: Lacarea Pleasant-Johnson (LPJ) , a standout cornerback from Southern Utah University. With an elite combination of size, speed, and versatility, LPJ possesses the tools to develop into a high-level NFL contributor. Beyond his physical attributes, his resilience, leadership, and commitment to giving back make him an exceptional individual on and off the field. A true sleeper in this year’s class, LPJ is poised to turn heads as the draft approaches. Lacarea Pleasant-Johnson (LPJ) | Cornerback | Southern Utah University Height:  6’1” | Weight:  178 lbs | Wingspan:  79.0” | Arm Length:  34.28” | Hand Size:  10.0” | 40-Yard Dash:  4.42 (hand-timed) Background Lacarea Pleasant-Johnson, better known as LPJ, enters the 2025 NFL Draft as one of the most intriguing cornerback prospects from the FCS level. A former 3-star recruit and the No. 15-ranked player out of Arizona, LPJ started his collegiate career at Utah, transferred to UNLV, and found his stride at Southern Utah. Nephew to NFL Hall of Famer Tony Dungy, LPJ has the athletic pedigree, size, and skill set to develop into a starting-caliber NFL cornerback. He honors his late mother by wearing #31, which has become a symbol of his resilience and focus. LPJ’s 2024 season highlighted his potential, where he started every game, allowed no 100-yard receiving performances, and showcased the versatility to thrive in both press-man and zone coverage schemes . His verified Junior Day metrics, including a hand-timed 4.42 40-yard dash , a 79.0” wingspan , and  34.28” arms , give him one of the most physically impressive profiles in the draft. Strengths Size and Length:  Ideal frame for an NFL cornerback with a 6’1” height and a massive 79.0” wingspan. His arm length (34.28”) allows him to consistently disrupt receivers in phase or at the LOS. Top-End Speed:  A 4.42-second 40-yard dash (hand-timed) highlights his ability to cover ground quickly and stick with vertical threats. Ball Skills:  Anticipates routes well, evidenced by 3 interceptions in 2024, including a highlight 59-yard pick-six against UC Davis . Versatility:  Has experience at both boundary corner and nickel, thriving in both press and zone coverage systems. Run Support:  Physical tackler who isn’t afraid to engage in run defense, with 2.5 tackles for loss in 2024. Mental Toughness and Leadership:  Overcame significant personal adversity, channeling that into a focused, team-first approach on and off the field. Football IQ:  NFL bloodlines combined with experience across three collegiate programs have prepared him to understand advanced defensive concepts. Weaknesses Tackling Consistency:  While physical, his technique in wrapping up ball carriers can be refined. Mirroring Quick Receivers:  Needs improvement in short-area footwork to match smaller, shifty NFL receivers. Developmental Coverage Technique:  Could benefit from further refinement in man coverage, particularly in tracking through the receiver’s route tree. 2024 Season Highlights Games Played:  12 Tackles:  31 total (25 solo) TFL:  2.5 for 6 yards Sacks:  0.5 for 1 yard Interceptions:  3 (72 return yards, 1 touchdown) Pass Breakups:  9 Notable Performance:  A 59-yard pick-six against UC Davis demonstrated his ability to capitalize on poor throws and create game-changing plays. NFL Comparisons 1. Richard Sherman (Seattle Seahawks) LPJ shares Sherman’s combination of size, length, and intelligence. Like Sherman, he excels in press coverage, using his physicality and length to disrupt passing windows. His ability to track the ball and handle contested throws makes him an intriguing option for teams running Cover-3 or press-heavy schemes. 2. Channing Stribling (Michigan) LPJ’s combination of height and length is reminiscent of Channing Stribling, a former Michigan cornerback known for his frame and ball skills. Like Stribling, LPJ thrives in trail coverage and excels with his back to the quarterback, showing a natural ability to contest deep throws. However, Stribling’s lack of recovery speed and fluidity limited his NFL ceiling. LPJ offers a higher athletic upside with a verified 4.42 speed and superior arm length, but they share a similar need to refine short-area quickness and change-of-direction skills. Personal and Off-Field Impact LPJ’s character and leadership qualities shine just as brightly off the field as they do on it. NFL Bloodlines:  As the nephew of Tony Dungy, NFL Hall of Famer, and cousin of Eddie Pleasant (former NFL safety) and MarJon Beauchamp (NBA player), LPJ has been exposed to elite athletic mentorship his entire life. Foundation:  LPJ plans to launch the "Jaquel Pleasant Foundation"  in honor of his late mother. This nonprofit will focus on supporting children who have lost parents to cancer, offering camps, resources, and financial assistance to those in need. Education:  A dedicated student-athlete, LPJ has earned a Bachelor’s degree in Sociology from UNLV and is pursuing a Master’s in Sports Broadcasting and Communication at Southern Utah. Resilience:  Having lost his mother at age 11, LPJ uses his mother’s memory as motivation. His journey through adversity is a testament to his mental toughness and relentless pursuit of excellence. NFL Draft Projection Projected Round:  Late Day 3 Potential - Undrafted Free Agent Best Scheme Fit:  Press-heavy or zone-based secondary. LPJ’s size, length, and speed fit the profile for NFL teams seeking a physical corner capable of matching up with larger receivers. Key Quotes On his game: “I model my game after Richard Sherman. I bring length, size, speed, and physicality to any secondary.” On his motivation: “I wear #31 because my mom passed away at that age. Every time I step on the field, I honor her memory.” Summary Lacarea Pleasant-Johnson is a sleeper prospect with all the physical tools and mental makeup to succeed at the NFL level. His combination of elite length, 4.42 speed, and versatility makes him an ideal fit for aggressive NFL defenses. Having allowed no 100-yard receiving games during his college career, LPJ has already shown the ability to be a lockdown defender. Off the field, LPJ’s leadership, academic achievements, and dedication to giving back through his foundation further highlight his potential to be a positive influence both in the locker room and in the community. With interest from several NFL teams and a strong Pro Day, he could solidify his spot as a Day 3 draft steal. LPJ is a player with the physical and mental attributes to outperform his draft position and contribute as a starter early in his career.

We are in the midst of college football bowl season, and the inaugural 12-team College Football Playoff kicks off this week. With that in mind, I wanted to explore five of the biggest NFL Draft questions heading into this pivotal time. Who is the QB1 in the 2025 NFL Draft? Who is the top riser and faller on draft boards from the 2024 college football season? Additionally, how does this year’s draft class compare to previous years, and which team will secure the No. 1 overall pick—and what will they do with it? 1. Who has been the biggest riser throughout the season? Throughout the 2024 college football season, the debate over QB1 for the 2025 NFL Draft evolved significantly. Early on, it seemed to center on Georgia’s Carson Beck and Colorado’s Shedeur Sanders. Other names like Miller Moss and Garrett Nussmeier surged briefly in the early weeks, followed by Quinn Ewers gaining attention after a standout performance against Michigan. However, as the season progressed and competition intensified, two quarterbacks maintained the highest level of consistency at football’s most important position: Shedeur Sanders and Miami’s Cam Ward. Cam Ward capped off the 2024 season as the nation’s second-leading passer in yards and led all quarterbacks in touchdown passes. He completed 67% of his throws with just seven interceptions, demonstrating both efficiency and playmaking ability. Ward’s impressive performance earned him a trip to New York as a Heisman Trophy finalist. Ward’s meteoric rise is even more remarkable when you consider his humble beginnings. He entered college as a zero-star recruit with only one offer—from Incarnate Word. After lighting up the field for two seasons there, Ward transferred to Washington State, where he continued to shine. Following the 2023 season, Ward contemplated entering the 2024 NFL Draft but received third- to fourth-round predraft grades from NFL scouts. Rather than settling, he opted to return for his final year of college eligibility to improve his game. Entering the transfer portal, he became a highly coveted recruit and ultimately chose the Miami Hurricanes—a decision that has since paid off in spades. Cam Ward’s decision to return to college football transformed his draft stock. Once projected as a third-round pick in the 2024 NFL Draft, he is now firmly in the conversation as a potential top-10 pick in 2025 following a phenomenal season with the Hurricanes. 2. Which player did not perform up to expectations? Heading into the 2024 college football season, Georgia’s Carson Beck was one of the most hyped quarterback prospects, often mentioned as a contender for QB1 in the 2025 NFL Draft. The Bulldogs were primed for another championship run, and Beck’s physical tools—his size, arm strength, and passing efficiency—gave scouts reasons to believe he could emerge as one of the best signal-callers in the nation. However, the season did not go as planned for Beck, as inconsistent performances and a lack of signature moments caused his draft stock to tumble. Beck showed flashes of brilliance throughout the season, but he struggled to deliver consistently against elite competition. His issues with processing defenses and operating under pressure were particularly evident in Georgia’s most critical matchups. While his arm talent remained undeniable, his accuracy wavered at times, especially in high-leverage situations. Moreover, Beck’s tendency to rely heavily on his first read rather than progressing through his options raised concerns among scouts about his readiness for the next level. Injuries to key offensive weapons and turnover on Georgia's offensive line also played a role in Beck’s struggles. However, quarterbacks at the next level are often evaluated based on how they elevate their teammates, and Beck fell short in this regard. Unlike other top prospects who consistently found ways to overcome adversity, Beck's performances were too often defined by inconsistency. By the end of the season, the debate over Beck as QB1 was no longer relevant, as he had firmly dropped out of Day 1 contention. While he did show improvement in the latter part of the season, it wasn’t enough to restore the confidence scouts had in him at the start of the year. Beck now faces an uphill battle to rebuild his draft stock, and an NFL team will need to see significant development before investing a high pick in him. At this point, he is projected as a Day 2 prospect, possibly even falling to the mid-to-late rounds if concerns about his consistency persist through the pre-draft process. Beck’s season serves as a cautionary tale of how quickly preseason hype can evaporate when expectations aren’t met, especially in a quarterback class where others rose to seize the spotlight. 3. How does the top of this draft compare to years past? The 2025 NFL Draft class presents a unique profile compared to recent years. While it lacks the blue-chip, can't-miss prospects at marquee positions like quarterback and wide receiver, it more than compensates with depth in defensive talent and versatility across the board. Defensive Depth Leads the Way This draft is shaping up to be one of the deepest defensive classes in recent memory. Players like Georgia’s Mykel Williams (EDGE), Michigan’s Mason Graham (DT), and Malachi Starks (S) headline a defensive crop loaded with both top-tier talent and positional depth. Travis Hunter’s decision to classify as either a cornerback or wide receiver will also play a significant role in the defensive rankings. If Hunter declares as a cornerback, he’ll challenge Michigan’s Will Johnson for CB1 status, giving this cornerback class a dynamic 1-2 punch rarely seen in past drafts. The defensive edge and interior linemen positions in particular are among the strongest in recent years, echoing the depth of the 2022 draft that saw Travon Walker go No. 1 overall. Offensive Positional Concerns On the offensive side, the quarterback class doesn’t match the top-end star power of the 2024 class, which featured Caleb Williams and Drake Maye as elite, franchise-level talents. While Shedeur Sanders and Cam Ward headline the group, the overall depth is less inspiring, with players like Quinn Ewers, Jalen Milroe, and Garrett Nussmeier offering potential but inconsistent resumes. For wide receivers, the class hinges on the decision of Travis Hunter. If Hunter opts to focus on being a full-time WR, he’s the clear WR1, but if he commits to defense, players like Tetairoa McMillan and Luther Burden III will step into the spotlight. This receiver group lacks the generational talent of 2024 but offers intriguing versatility and depth into the middle rounds. Running Backs and Tight Ends Stand Out Running back is one of the standout positions in the 2025 draft. Boise State’s Ashton Jeanty leads the class as a potential first-rounder, with comparisons to Bijan Robinson and Saquon Barkley for his balance of speed, power, and contact balance. The depth at running back extends into Day 2 and 3, making this class particularly exciting for teams looking to upgrade their backfields. Tight ends also feature a strong group, led by Michigan’s Colston Loveland and Penn State’s Tyler Warren. Both players offer size, athleticism, and the ability to contribute as versatile offensive weapons. Overall Comparison The 2025 draft resembles the 2022 class in terms of its defensive dominance, with fewer top-10-caliber players at offensive skill positions. It lacks the generational talents seen in 2024 at quarterback and wide receiver, but the depth in positions like EDGE, defensive tackle, and running back ensures that teams in need of foundational defensive pieces or dynamic runners will have ample options. This class may not dominate headlines for its star power, but its depth, particularly on defense, makes it a strong class for teams seeking long-term contributors. 4. Who is QB1 as of now and why? At this point in the draft process, Shedeur Sanders stands out as QB1 for the 2025 NFL Draft. While this quarterback class may not feature the projected generational talent seen in 2024 with Caleb Williams and Drake Maye, Sanders' leadership, toughness, and overall body of work make him the premier quarterback prospect in this group. His ability to rise above challenging circumstances, particularly playing behind subpar offensive lines at Colorado, demonstrates the resilience and poise NFL teams seek in a franchise quarterback. Sanders finished the 2024 college football season with a stellar stat line: 3,926 passing yards (3rd in the nation), 35 passing touchdowns, a 74% completion percentage, and just 6 interceptions. Additionally, he added 5 rushing touchdowns, showcasing his versatility and ability to impact the game in multiple ways. This consistent production, even in difficult circumstances at times in 2024, more so in 2023 with a bad offensive line, is a testament to Sanders' ability to handle adversity. These traits were evident not just during his time at Colorado but also in his tenure at Jackson State. His 2024 campaign culminated in a trip to New York as a Heisman Trophy finalist, further cementing his status as one of the top players in the nation. The QB1 Debate: Shedeur Sanders vs. Cam Ward The race for QB1 ultimately comes down to Shedeur Sanders and Miami’s Cam Ward. Ward’s combination of arm strength, athleticism, and a breakout 2024 campaign makes him a compelling candidate, but I am narrowly leaning toward Shedeur Sanders. Both players have faced their fair share of adversity in different ways, but Sanders possesses that "it factor" and confidence you want in a franchise quarterback. While some may perceive his confidence as entitled arrogance, NFL scouts, coaches, and future teammates are likely to embrace his unwavering belief in himself and his ability to lead. At the end of the day, the quarterback position is the most critical in football, and Sanders’ unique combination of production, leadership, and toughness firmly sets him apart in this draft class. While the debate between Sanders and Ward will undoubtedly continue into the pre-draft process, the evaluation must go beyond their impressive statistical résumés. Both players have demonstrated the ability to produce at a high level, but the ultimate decision will likely hinge on intangible qualities—leadership, poise, and the confidence to inspire teammates and command a locker room. In this regard, Sanders' undeniable presence and ability to elevate those around him may give him the edge. 5. Who will have the No. top pick, and what will they do with it? As of today, the Raiders and Giants are in a position to pick at the top of the 2025 NFL Draft. Both teams are in dire need of a quarterback, and most early mock drafts project some combination of Cam Ward and Shedeur Sanders going first and second overall. Both quarterbacks bring a mix of leadership, production, and potential, making them logical picks for teams looking to reset at football’s most important position. The debate between Ward’s arm talent and athleticism versus Sanders’ leadership and poise will likely dominate the pre-draft conversation. However, if the draft order shifts to include teams like the Panthers, Jaguars, or Patriots picking at No. 1 or No. 2, the equation changes significantly in what is shaping up to be a defense-heavy draft. For instance, if the Jaguars land the top pick, they might opt for Sanders’ teammate and Heisman winner Travis Hunter. Hunter’s versatility as either a wide receiver, cornerback, or even a two-way player makes him a rare and tantalizing talent who could transform any team. The Jaguars could also address their secondary needs by selecting Michigan’s elite cornerback Will Johnson, who has drawn comparisons to Patrick Surtain and would instantly upgrade their defense on day one. Another name to watch for the top two picks is Michigan defensive tackle Mason Graham. Graham’s ability to dominate the interior line, both as a run-stopper and as a pocket-collapsing pass rusher, makes him one of the most impactful players in this draft class. For teams like the Panthers or Patriots, who could benefit from bolstering their defensive fronts, Graham represents a cornerstone player who can reshape a defense. His combination of size, strength, and athleticism could make him a surprising contender for the No. 1 overall pick, depending on team needs and the final draft order.

As the college football season progresses, the latest 2025 NFL Draft Top 50 Big Board   update reflects significant shifts at several positions. This analysis highlights the biggest risers, fallers, and new entrants into the rankings, offering a snapshot of how this year’s draft class is evolving. Speaking of how this class is evolving, the 2025 NFL Draft will be a far more defense-heavy draft class. Our current top 10 rankings include six defenders plus Travis Hunter. Depending on what position you believe Travis Hunter should play in the NFL (cough cough, he should play DB), he could be the seventh defender listed in the top 10 of our current NFL Draft big board rankings. Biggest Risers The following players have seen the most significant jumps in the rankings, cementing themselves as premier NFL Draft prospects: Travis Hunter (ATH, Colorado) – From 2 to 1 Ashton Jeanty (RB, Boise State) – From 16 to 4 (Jeanty is a can't miss prospect) Jalon Walker (LB, Georgia) – From Unranked to 10 (Walker's athleticism and versatility is elite) Will Campbell (OT, LSU) – From 6 to 9 Shavon Revel (CB, ECU) – From Unranked to 13 (Tore his ACL, but after watching his tape, he is one of the top DBs in this cycle). Cam Ward (QB, Miami) – From 34 to 23 Ashton Gillotte (EDGE, Louisville) – From Unranked to 41 Garrett Nussmeier (QB, LSU) – From Unranked to 42 Walter Nolen (IDL, Ole Miss) – From Unranked to 44 Biggest Fallers While still talented prospects, the following players have dropped in the rankings, with some falling out of the Top 50 entirely: Noah Fifita (QB, Arizona) – From 36 to Unranked Quinshon Judkins (RB, Ole Miss) – From 44 to Unranked (Fell out because of higher priority positions gaining steam) Xavier Nwankpa (S, Iowa) – From 47 to Unranked Danny Stutsman (LB, Oklahoma) – From 48 to Unranked TreVeyon Henderson (RB, Ohio State) – From 43 to Unranked (Fell out because of higher priority positions gaining steam) Jaishawn Barham (LB, Michigan) – From 50 to Unranked New Entrants The following players have broken into the Top 50 rankings with standout performances this season: Jalon Walker (LB, Georgia) – Now ranked 10 Shavon Revel (CB, ECU) – Now ranked 13 Ashton Gillotte (EDGE, Louisville) – Now ranked 41 Garrett Nussmeier (QB, LSU) – Now ranked 42 (He could elevate to QB1, but I am still on the fence. He shows some elite traits, but there are lapses in consistency and decision-making.). Walter Nolen (IDL, Ole Miss) – Now ranked 44 Position Analysis: Top 50 Breakdown Position Sept Nov Change QB 8 6 -2 ATH 0 1 +1 RB 4 1 -3 WR 7 6 -1 TE 1 3 +2 OT 7 7 0 IDL 6 7 +1 EDGE 8 12 +4 LB 2 1 -1 CB 5 4 -1 S 2 2 0 Key Observations Rising Positional Value : Linebackers and tight ends have seen significant gains, driven by versatile players like Jalon Walker (10) and Colston Loveland (14). Depth at Premium Positions : Offensive tackle and edge defender remain strong, with multiple new additions to the rankings. Quarterbacks Hold Steady : The QB group continues to show depth, with players like Cam Ward (23) and Garrett Nussmeier (42) solidifying their status. 2025 NFL Draft: Top 50 Big Board Rankings 1). Travis Hunter (ATH, Colorado) Travis Hunter’s unique two-way skill set as a cornerback and wide receiver makes him one of the most versatile prospects in recent history. As a CB, Hunter has elite-level anticipation and ball skills that enable him to challenge WR1s effectively, especially in zone schemes where he can read and react. While his thin frame (185 lbs) impacts his physicality in press coverage, his recovery speed (reported 4.4 forty-yard dash) and route recognition help mitigate these issues. At WR, Hunter’s burst, elite ball tracking, and run-after-catch ability make him an explosive threat downfield. His dynamic playstyle suits a team open to leveraging him in specific, high-impact roles on both sides of the ball, potentially similar to Deion Sanders. 2). Will Johnson (CB, Michigan) Will Johnson presents a dynamic blend of size, speed, and physicality that profiles him as a future No. 1 NFL cornerback. With elite-level coverage instincts, Johnson excels in both man and zone schemes, showing impressive route recognition and anticipation skills. His long frame (6’2”) and fluidity enable him to contest larger receivers effectively, while his quick-twitch athleticism supports top-level man coverage against speedier opponents. In run defense, Johnson is a willing and physical tackler, making him valuable in schemes demanding versatility and physicality. Projected as a shutdown corner capable of elevating an NFL secondary, Johnson’s skill set should allow for immediate impact and the potential for Pro Bowl-level contributions. 3). Mason Graham (IDL, Michigan) Graham is a physical force on the interior defensive line, showcasing an exceptional blend of size, strength, and explosiveness that elevates him as a high-impact IDL prospect. He excels as a run-stopper with natural leverage, dominating gaps and setting a reliable anchor against double-teams. Graham’s hand usage, developed pass-rush moves, and lateral quickness allow him to consistently pressure the pocket. Best suited to play as a 1-tech or 3-tech in a four-man front, Graham could also perform in hybrid fronts as a versatile gap-control defender. His skill set projects as an immediate starter with potential for Pro Bowl contributions in the right defensive scheme. 4). Ashton Jeanty (RB, Boise State) Jeanty’s combination of agility, vision, and compact power makes him a versatile offensive weapon, ideally suited for zone-blocking schemes, particularly those utilizing outside zone and pin/pull concepts. His ability to find lanes and cut back effectively showcases his fit in these systems. In the passing game, his dual-threat capability allows for deployment as a safety valve with dynamic after the catch ability. 5). Tetairoa McMillan (WR, Arizona) McMillan is an enticing WR prospect who blends exceptional size and body control with the versatility to align at X, Z, or in the slot. At 6'5", McMillan combines a wide catch radius with a natural feel for leveraging his frame against defenders. While his speed is not elite, his smooth acceleration and hip fluidity enable him to separate and create mismatches. He is a strong fit for a vertically-oriented offensive scheme that can take full advantage of his downfield contested catch ability. 6). Mykel Williams (EDGE, Georgia) Williams is an alignment-versatile edge rusher who has all the physical tools to develop into a premier player in the NFL. His ability to play various positions along the defensive front makes him a valuable asset in multiple schemes. Williams has been utilized as a stand-up edge rusher, head-up over the center in a 0-tech, and in other roles within Georgia’s complex defensive scheme. His best fit in the NFL would be as a 4-3 defensive end or a 3-4 outside linebacker, where his athleticism and versatility can be maximized. 7). Abdul Carter (EDGE, Penn State) Carter's primary role at Penn State has been as a box linebacker, where he excels due to his remarkable physicality and agility. His quickness allows him to close space sideline to sideline effectively, making him a formidable force against the run. In 2023, Carter consistently aligned as an inside linebacker but also took over 100 snaps on the edge of the defense. These snaps included roles as a pass rusher and in coverage scenarios, demonstrating his versatility. 8). Malaki Starks (S, Georgia) Starks exhibits a balanced skill set that suits both man and zone coverage, making him versatile as a safety. His ability to read the quarterback and diagnose plays quickly is notable. Starks has shown effectiveness in slot/nickel situations, suggesting he could fit well in schemes that value multidimensional defensive backs who can cover, tackle, and play the ball. His experience and growing knowledge of defensive schemes, coupled with physical and mental development, indicate a strong adaptability to various defensive schemes at the NFL level. 9). Will Campbell (OT, LSU) Campbell is an athletic and powerful tackle prospect with strong positional versatility, having excelled at left tackle for LSU but projecting effectively to guard or center due to his skill set. His excellent balance, anchor strength, and quick hands make him reliable in both run and pass protection. In the NFL, Campbell may be best suited on the interior to maximize his strengths, where his power and efficient technique can shine against interior defenders. Ideal for both zone and power schemes, Campbell offers immediate impact with the potential for Pro Bowl-level performance as a guard or tackle. 10). Jalon Walker (LB, Georgia) Walker is a highly versatile and explosive linebacker with natural pass-rush instincts and an ideal athletic profile for hybrid roles. He projects as a disruptive weapon on early downs as a run defender and as an edge rusher on passing downs. His ideal fit is in a system that maximizes linebacker versatility, with the flexibility to use him both in pass rush and coverage assignments. Although he lacks extensive off-ball linebacker experience, his range, burst, and strength make him an immediate contributor with Pro Bowl potential in the right scheme. 11). Kelvin Banks (OT, Texas) Banks is a smooth, refined tackle with elite footwork and technique, excelling in pass protection. His lateral agility and strength make him equally effective in run blocking, fitting well in both zone and power schemes. 12). Nic Scourton (EDGE, Texas A&M) Scourton is a powerful edge rusher with quick hands and impressive strength, excelling in collapsing pockets. His ability to rotate inside on passing downs adds versatility for hybrid defensive fronts. 13). Shavon Revel (CB, ECU) Revel is a press-man corner with elite length, physicality, and fluid movement skills. He thrives in contested catch situations and is a disruptive presence at the line of scrimmage. 14). Colston Loveland (TE, Michigan) Loveland is a dynamic tight end with a large catch radius and strong mismatch potential. His blend of speed and size makes him a reliable weapon in both traditional and spread offensive schemes. 15). Luther Burden (WR, Missouri) Burden is an explosive slot receiver who excels in motion-based systems and yards after catch opportunities. His quickness and agility make him a dangerous playmaker in space. 16). Kenneth Grant (IDL, Michigan) Grant is a versatile interior lineman who excels at controlling gaps and disrupting the pocket. His power and lateral quickness make him an ideal fit for both 3-4 and 4-3 defensive schemes. 17). James Pearce Jr. (EDGE, Tennessee) Pearce is an agile edge rusher with exceptional first-step quickness and bend around the edge. His versatility makes him effective as both a stand-up rusher and a traditional defensive end. 18). LT Overton (EDGE, Alabama) Overton is a rising edge prospect with a strong combination of size, length, and athleticism. He can fit seamlessly into both 4-3 and 3-4 schemes as a disruptive presence on the edge. 19). Shedeur Sanders (QB, Colorado) Sanders is an accurate and poised quarterback who thrives in quick-passing systems. His pocket awareness and ability to extend plays add value to offenses emphasizing timing and rhythm. 20). Benjamin Morrison (CB, Notre Dame) Morrison is a physical cornerback who excels in press and zone coverage. His football IQ and ability to anticipate routes make him a versatile defender in any scheme. 21). Shemar Stewart (EDGE, Texas A&M) Stewart is a versatile edge defender with impressive power and quickness. He excels at setting the edge in the run game and providing consistent pressure as a pass rusher. 22). Derrick Harmon (IDL, Oregon) Harmon is a strong interior lineman who excels against the run and in collapsing the pocket. His combination of power and quick hands makes him disruptive on early downs. 23). Cam Ward (QB, Miami) Ward is an adaptable quarterback with elite arm talent and mobility, thriving in vertical passing schemes. His improvisational skills and downfield accuracy make him a dangerous playmaker. 24). Tyleik Williams (IDL, Ohio State) Williams is a stout interior defender with excellent leverage and gap discipline. He thrives in two-gap systems and provides a strong anchor in run defense. 25). Deone Walker (IDL, Kentucky) Walker is a massive, versatile lineman who dominates blockers with his raw strength. His ability to disrupt plays in various alignments makes him a valuable asset in multiple schemes. 26). Denzel Burke (CB, Ohio State) Burke is a long, physical corner who excels in zone coverage and vertical routes. While not as effective in man-to-man situations, his physicality and ball skills make him a key defensive contributor. 27). Kevin Winston Jr. (S, Penn State) Winston is a rangy safety with excellent ball skills and the ability to cover ground quickly. His versatility allows him to excel in both man and zone coverage schemes. 28). Tyler Warren (TE, Penn State) Warren is a versatile tight end who thrives as a blocker and red-zone target. His ability to line up in multiple roles makes him an asset for offenses that value tight end versatility. 29). Cameron Williams (OT, Texas) Williams is a physically dominant tackle excelling in both run blocking and pass protection. His size and strength make him an ideal fit for power-based offensive schemes. 30). Howard Cross III (IDL, Notre Dame) Cross is a quick, disruptive interior lineman who excels in penetration schemes. His ability to generate backfield pressure makes him an effective weapon against the pass. 31). Elic Ayomanor (WR, Stanford) Ayomanor is a physical X-receiver with excellent contested catch ability and deep threat potential. His combination of size and athleticism makes him a reliable target in critical situations. 32). Harold Fannin Jr. (TE, Bowling Green) Fannin is a versatile tight end excelling as both a blocker and a receiving threat. His ability to create mismatches against smaller defenders adds value in modern offensive schemes. 33). Quinn Ewers (QB, Texas) Ewers is a quick-release quarterback with excellent arm strength and deep-ball accuracy. His ability to operate in spread and RPO-based systems enhances his NFL potential. 34). Isaiah Bond (WR, Texas) Bond is an explosive playmaker with elite speed and route-running ability. He thrives in vertically oriented schemes that emphasize stretching the field. 35). Jalen Milroe (QB, Alabama) Milroe is a dual-threat quarterback with elite athleticism and arm strength. His ability to thrive in spread systems with zone-read and RPO elements makes him a high-upside prospect. 36). Aireontae Ersery (OT, Minnesota) Ersery is a balanced and technically sound tackle excelling in both run and pass blocking. His consistent footwork and hand placement make him a reliable edge protector. 37). Donovan Ezeiruaku (EDGE, Boston College) Ezeiruaku is an explosive pass rusher with active hands and the ability to disrupt the pocket. His quick first step and motor make him a consistent threat off the edge. 38). Emery Jones Jr. (OT, LSU) Jones is a physically imposing tackle who excels in run-blocking schemes. His versatility and ability to hold his ground in pass protection make him a dependable option on the line. 39). Emeka Egbuka (WR, Ohio State) Egbuka is an agile route-runner with reliable hands and the ability to create separation. His versatility as a slot and deep threat adds significant value to any offense. 40). Josh Simmons (OT, Ohio State) Simmons is a powerful offensive lineman excelling in both power and zone-blocking schemes. His physicality and strong technique make him a key asset in the trenches. 41). Garrett Nussmeier (QB, LSU) High-ceiling passer with strong pocket presence and above-average mobility, excelling in vertical offenses focused on big plays. 42). Josh Conerly Jr. (OT, Oregon) Athletic tackle with excellent footwork and agility, excelling in pass protection and capable of holding his own against speed rushers. 43). Walter Nolen (IDL, Ole Miss) Powerful and disruptive interior lineman, excelling at stopping the run and generating interior pressure. 44). Landon Jackson (EDGE, Arkansas) Strong and versatile edge rusher capable of excelling in hybrid defensive schemes, with consistent ability to set the edge. 45). Josaiah Stewart (EDGE, Michigan) Quick and agile edge rusher with excellent first-step explosiveness and effective hand technique to disrupt plays. 46). Carson Beck (QB, Georgia) Pro-style passer with strong arm talent and sharp timing, thriving in rhythm-based offensive systems and play-action. 47). Evan Stewart (WR, Oregon) Dynamic receiver with top-end speed and precise route-running ability, excelling as a deep threat and reliable target. 48). Jack Sawyer (EDGE, Ohio State) High-energy rusher with strength and technique to pressure quarterbacks and defend the run effectively in various schemes. 49). Princely Umanmielen (EDGE, Ole Miss) Versatile edge rusher excelling in both 4-3 and 3-4 alignments, with power and athleticism to disrupt backfields. 50). Josh Simmons (OT, Ohio State) Physical and technically sound blocker, excelling in both power and zone schemes with a strong anchor in pass protection.