Search Results

There’s Nothing Here... We can’t find the page you’re looking for. Check the URL, or head back home. Go Home

2022 NFL Draft Profile: USC WR Drake London Click Here to view our NFL Draft Big Board with player rankings and analysis. Click here to learn more about our updated player grade scale and critical position factors. Player Profile Name: Drake London School: USC Trojans Recruiting Profile: Click Here Position: WR Height: 6-5 Weight: 210 Year: Junior Jersey Number: 15 Offensive Scheme: Offensive Coordinator: Games Reviewed: Position Specific Critical Factors Hands (6) Very Good The best WR's in football display great hands; they can snatch or pluck the football when in tight coverage or the wide-open field. Some receivers use their bodies when catching and therefore need more development as hands catchers. Separation (7) Very Good A player's ability to separate from a defender while running a route is dependent on his ability to run a precise and clean route. Separation is not just the prospect's ability to separate with speed, but his ability to run several routes at a high level. The prospect's ability to sell a route to get a defender out of position is also a key way for a player to gain separation. Players with a limited route tree can make it easier for defenders to predict their route running tendencies. The ability to use their body to box out is another way to gain separation. After Catch Ability (7) Very Good A running back with the football in their hands, receivers who can catch a football and make defenders miss in open space, or that can break tackles is a commodity at the highest level of football: high-level WR's show elusiveness, strength, speed, and display toughness after the catch. Key Strengths Excellent after the catch Big Play Ability High-Level Ball Skills Key Weaknesses Hands (Needs to improve concentration) Pass Game Summary At 6-5 210lbs, Drake London provides a slim but big frame at the NFL level. The former two-sport athlete at USC participated on the USC basketball team, which is a testament to his playing style at WR, where he plays with excellent body control. London can box out defenders, and he can go up win the 50/50 ball. But do not be fooled into believing London is just a physical pass catcher; he is also a solid route runner who can gain separation at the top of his route. He can win at all levels of the field. His downfield ability is also high level; he tracks the football at a high level using a combination of a wide catch radius and excellent hands to beat defenders. In space, London shows great agility for his body type. He is elusive and is also tricky for smaller defenders to bring down. Drake London is a versatile WR who can line up at the X or in the slot. He has good upper body strength and can run through a DB's press coverage, and when in the slot with a free release, he can be dangerous. He plays with good awareness. He understands situational football and will locate the open areas while also being aware of the sticks. Run Game Summary Drake London is a competitive player with or without the ball in his hands. He is a willing and able run blocker. He had limited to no usage in the run game at USC via jet sweeps or reverses, but judging by his athleticism after the catch, he might be better than many realized in the run game. Final Analysis Drake London was a multi-sport athlete at USC. He played on the Trojans basketball team, and you can see the basketball skillset on the football field. London uses his frame to box out defenders and make plays on the football in highly contested situations. His long arms and frame provide him with an advantage over smaller, agile DB's sticky in coverage. London has an Instant Impact Player ceiling grading out as one of the top WR's in this class. His grade heading into the NFL is a solid level starter, but he can be a high-level NFL starter if he maximizes his potential. Final Grade Analysis Final Grade: (6.8) (High Upside Potential) (6.9-6.7) Solid Starter Level Ceiling Grade: (8.0) (Instant Impact Potential) (9.0-7.0) High-End Starter Floor Grade: (6.5) (Developmental Potential) (6.6-6.5) Lower Level Starter

Top 10 2025 NFL Draft QB Rankings: Carson Beck Leads the Charge, Quinn Ewers Close Behind Can the 2025 NFL Draft quarterbacks match up with the elite prospects from the 2024 class like Caleb Williams and Jayden Daniels? Quarterbacks like Carson Beck, Shedeur Sanders, and Quinn Ewers are leading the way early, but the competition behind the top 3 is ramping up. The 2024 NFL Draft featured a historic haul of quarterbacks, with six passers selected in Round 1, including the top three overall picks. The 2025 class is a work in progress, showing more promise with each passing week. As the college football season progresses, the regular season will reveal which of these passers can rise to the top of the 2025 NFL Draft rankings. Top 10 2025 NFL Draft QB Rankings 1. Carson Beck, Georgia Carson Beck continues to impress in the 2024 season, maintaining his poise in the pocket and showing exceptional accuracy, completing 72.4% of his passes for 3,941 yards and 24 touchdowns in 2023. This season, Beck has built on that success, leading Georgia to a significant win over Clemson. His ability to deliver in crucial moments, especially against top-tier defenses, has cemented his status as the top quarterback in this draft class. 2. Quinn Ewers, Texas Quinn Ewers' draft stock skyrocketed after his elite performance against Michigan in 2024. In that game, he converted 66.7% of his third-and-long situations, including a clutch 33-yard bomb on 3rd and 13. Ewers' ability to perform under pressure, especially on third downs, has boosted him into the conversation as a potential top-10 pick, showing NFL-level poise and decision-making. 3. Shedeur Sanders, Colorado Shedeur Sanders is a highly scrutinized prospect on a struggling Colorado team. He started the year with a dominant 445-yard, four-touchdown performance against North Dakota State. However, his struggles against Nebraska, compounded by a poor offensive line, were evident. Despite this, Sanders has displayed the ability to make NFL-caliber throws under pressure, even completing passes while facing a free rusher. His leadership and composure solidify him as a top quarterback prospect. 4. Cam Ward, Miami (FL) Cam Ward made an impressive debut for Miami, throwing for 385 yards and three touchdowns against Florida to start the 2024 season. His ability to make plays outside the pocket and his elite arm strength were on full display, elevating him to one of the most intriguing quarterback prospects. 5. Kyle McCord, Syracuse Kyle McCord has been one of the biggest surprises of the 2024 season after transferring to Syracuse from Ohio State. Through two games, he has thrown for 735 yards and eight touchdowns, leading the nation in passing TDs. His ability to dissect defenses, as seen in his 381-yard, 4-touchdown performance against No. 23 Georgia Tech, has raised his draft stock significantly, positioning him as a rising prospect. 6. Jalen Milroe, Alabama Jalen Milroe’s dual-threat ability continues to make him a dynamic presence at Alabama. In 2024, he’s accounted for 394 passing yards, five touchdowns, and 81 rushing yards with four additional scores. His deep-ball accuracy and ability to make plays off-script make him an exciting option for teams looking for a versatile quarterback who thrives in RPO systems. 7. Drew Allar, Penn State Drew Allar has had a strong start to the 2024 season, throwing for 420 yards, five touchdowns, and one interception. At 6'5" and 238 pounds, Allar’s size and arm strength make him an ideal fit for pro-style offenses. His NFL size, improving efficiency, and functional mobility have kept him in the conversation for an early-round draft pick. 8. Noah Fifita, Arizona Noah Fifita continues to impress with his accuracy and pocket presence, despite being undersized at 5'11". In 2024, he’s continued to show excellent decision-making, navigating Arizona's offense effectively. Fifita's ability to extend plays and deliver precise throws makes him a fit for teams seeking a quarterback with pro-style or West Coast offensive skills. His size concerns will play a major role in how high he is drafted. 9. Miller Moss, USC Miller Moss made a name for himself in 2024 by leading USC to a dramatic win over LSU, throwing for 378 yards and a touchdown. With Caleb Williams gone, Moss stepped up right away in 2024 against LSU, delivering clutch throws late in the game. His calmness under pressure and ability to guide USC in big moments has positioned him as a rising NFL Draft prospect. 10. Garrett Nussmeier, LSU Garrett Nussmeier has had an explosive start to 2024, throwing for 610 yards and eight touchdowns through two games. His aggressive approach and arm strength have drawn attention, especially with his ability to stretch the field. Despite some inconsistency in decision-making, his performance has put him on the radar as a potential early-day-two pick.

Bullock's current skill set, marked by his excellent coverage abilities and range, positions him as a high-end starter potential in the NFL. His areas for improvement, particularly in tackling and physicality, are aspects that can be developed with proper coaching and strength training. Given his current abilities and potential for growth, Bullock could be a valuable addition to an NFL team, particularly one seeking a versatile, rangey safety with strong pass coverage skills. < Back Calen Bullock USC HT: 6030 WT: 190 YR: JR POS: S OVR RK 77 POS RK CEILING POTENTIAL 4 Mid-Level Starter Potential OVR RK PLAYSTYLE & SCHEME FIT Calen Bullock exhibits a play style characterized by elite speed and athleticism, making him a versatile fit in various defensive schemes. He's especially proficient in deep zone coverage, where his ability to cover large areas of the field quickly and effectively stands out. Bullock's skills are well-suited for a single-high safety role, where he can utilize his range and ball-hawking abilities. However, his play against the run and in man-to-man situations needs further development. CEILING GRADE ANALYSIS Mid-Level Starter Potential (60-64) A mid-level starter potential prospect is a player who is likely to be a mid-level starter on their team, but with the potential to exceed expectations within 2-3 years. They have good physical tools and athleticism and can perform at a high level. They have some weaknesses, but they are minor. These players are typically fourth- or fifth-round picks, and they have the potential to be starters in the league. Primary scout: Brandon Lundberg KEY STRENGTHS Ball Hawk Range IQ KEY WEAKNESSES Tackling Technique Physicality Man Coverage PLAYER COMPARISONS

2023 NFL Draft: The Top 10 Best Available Day Three Prospects Includes Kelee Ringo, Dawand Jones We have arrived. It is the third and final day of the 2023 NFL Draft. On day two we had QB's Will Levis and Hendon Hooker finally come off the board. The Tennessee Titans moved up to draft Levis early in the 2nd round, while the Detroit Lions traded up in round three to grab Hendon Hooker. We now have all 5 of the top 5 projected QB's off the draft board. Check out the Football Scout 365 NFL Draft Board. We have a lot of elite-level potential left on the draft board at critical positions. Championships are won on day three of the NFL Draft. A few names we love are Georgia CB Kelee Ringo and Ohio State OT Dawand Jones. Here is the draft order for day three of the 2023 NFL Draft. ROUND 4 103. Chicago Bears 104. Houston Texans 105. Houston Texans (from Arizona Cardinals) 106. Indianapolis Colts 107. New England Patriots (from Los Angeles Rams) 108. Seattle Seahawks (from Denver Broncos) 109. Las Vegas Raiders 110. Indianapolis Colts (from Tennessee Titans through) 111. Cleveland Browns 112. New York Jets 113. Atlanta Falcons 114. Carolina Panthers 115. New Orleans Saints 116. Green Bay Packers 117. New England Patriots 118. Washington Commanders 119. Minnesota Vikings (from Detroit Lions) 120. New England Patriots (from Pittsburgh Steelers) 121. Jacksonville Jaguars (from Tampa Bay Buccaneers) 122. Arizona Cardinals (from Miami Dolphins through Kansas City Chiefs and Detroit Lions) 123. Seattle Seahawks 124. Baltimore Ravens 125. Los Angeles Chargers 126. Cleveland Browns (from Minnesota Vikings) 127. Jacksonville Jaguars 128. Los Angeles Rams (from New York Giants) 129. Dallas Cowboys 130. Jacksonville Jaguars (from Buffalo Bills) 131. Cincinnati Bengals 132. Pittsburgh Steelers (from San Francisco 49ers through Carolina Panthers) 133. Chicago Bears (from Philadelphia Eagles) 134. Kansas City Chiefs 135. New England Patriots (compensatory selection) ROUND 5 136. Jacksonville Jaguars (from Chicago Bears) 137. Buffalo Bills (from Arizona Cardinals) 138. Indianapolis Colts 139. Arizona Cardinals (from Denver Broncos through Detroit Lions) 140. Cleveland Browns (from Los Angeles Rams) 141. Indianapolis Colts (from Las Vegas Raiders) 142. Cleveland Browns 143. New York Jets 144. Las Vegas Raiders (from Atlanta Falcons) 145. Carolina Panthers 146. New Orleans Saints 147. Tennessee Titans 148. Chicago Bears (from New England Patriots through Baltimore Ravens) 149. Green Bay Packers 150. Washington Commanders 151. Seattle Seahawks (from Pittsburgh Steelers) 152. Detroit Lions 153. Tampa Bay Buccaneers 154. Seattle Seahawks 155. San Francisco 49ers (from Miami Dolphins) 156. Los Angeles Chargers 157. Baltimore Ravens 158. Minnesota Vikings 159. Green Bay Packers (from Jacksonville Jaguars through Atlanta Falcons and Detroit Lions) 160. Jacksonville Jaguars (from New York Giants) 161. Los Angeles Rams (from Dallas Cowboys through Houston Texans) 162. Indianapolis Colts (from Buffalo Bills) 163. Cincinnati Bengals 164. Minnesota Vikings (from San Francisco 49ers) 165. New Orleans Saints (from Philadelphia Eagles) 166. Kansas City Chiefs 167. Los Angeles Rams (compensatory selection) 168. Arizona Cardinals (compensatory selection) 169. Dallas Cowboys (compensatory selection) 170. New York Jets (from Green Bay Packers; compensatory selection) 171. Los Angeles Rams (compensatory selection) 172. New York Giants (compensatory selection) 173. San Francisco 49ers (compensatory selection) 174. Las Vegas Raiders (compensatory selection) 175. Tampa Bay Buccaneers (compensatory selection) 176. Indianapolis Colts (from Dallas Cowboys; compensatory selection) 177. Los Angeles Rams (compensatory selection) ROUND 6 178. Kansas City Chiefs (from Chicago Bears through Miami Dolphins) 179. Green Bay Packers (from Houston Texans through Tampa Bay Buccaneers) 180. Arizona Cardinals 181. Tampa Bay Buccaneers (from Indianapolis Colts) 182. Los Angeles Rams 183. Denver Broncos (from Denver Broncos through Detroit Lions) 184. New England Patriots (from Las Vegas Raiders) 185. Jacksonville Jaguars (from New York Jets) 186. Tennessee Titans (from Atlanta Falcons) 187. New England Patriots (from Carolina Panthers) 188. Philadelphia Eagles (from New Orleans Saints through Houston Texans) 189. Los Angeles Rams (from Tennessee Titans) 190. Cleveland Browns 191. Houston Texans (from Green Bay Packers through Los Angeles Rams) 192. New England Patriots 193. Washington Commanders 194. Kansas City Chiefs (from Detroit Lions) 195. Denver Broncos (from Pittsburgh Steelers) 196. Tampa Bay Buccaneers 197. Miami Dolphins 198. Seattle Seahawks 199. Baltimore Ravens 200. Los Angeles Chargers 201. Houston Texans (from Minnesota Vikings) 202. Jacksonville Jaguars 203. Houston Texans (from New York Giants) 204. Las Vegas Raiders (from Dallas Cowboys) 205. Buffalo Bills 206. Cincinnati Bengals 207. Green Bay Packers (from San Francisco 49ers through Houston Texans and New York Jets) 208. Jacksonville Jaguars (from Philadelphia Eagles) 209. New York Giants (from Kansas City Chiefs) 210. New England Patriots (compensatory selection) 211. Minnesota Vikings (compensatory selection) 212. Dallas Cowboys (compensatory selection) 213. Arizona Cardinals (compensatory selection) 214. Las Vegas Raiders (compensatory selection) 215. Washington Commanders (compensatory selection) 216. San Francisco 49ers (compensatory selection) 217. Cincinnati Bengals (from Kansas Cityt Chiefs; compensatory selection) ROUND 7 218. Chicago Bears 219. Philadelphia Eagles (from Houston Texans through Minnesota Vikings) 220. Las Vegas Raiders (from Arizona Cardinals) 221. Indianapolis Colts 222. Minnesota Vikings (from Denver Broncos through San Francisco 49ers) 223. Los Angeles Rams 224. Atlanta Falcons (from Las Vegas Raiders) 225. Atlanta Falcons 226. Jacksonville Jaguars (from Carolina Panthers) 227. New Orleans Saints 228. Tennessee Titans 229. Cleveland Browns 230. Philadelphia Eagles (from New York Jets through Tampa Bay Buccaneers and Houston Texans) 231. Las Vegas Raiders (from New England Patriots) 232. Green Bay Packers 233. Washington Commanders 234. Los Angeles Rams (from Pittsburgh Steelers) 235. Green Bay Packers (from Detroit Lions through Los Angeles Rams) 236. Indianapolis Colts (from Tampa Bay Buccaneers) 237. Seattle Seahawks 238. Miami Dolphins 239. Los Angeles Chargers 240. Jacksonville Jaguars (from Baltimore Ravens through New York Giants) 241. Pittsburgh Steelers (from Minnesota Vikings through Denver Broncos) 242. Green Bay Packers (from Jacksonville Jaguars) 243. New York Giants 244. Dallas Cowboys 245. New England Patriots (from Buffalo Bills through Atlanta Falcons) 246. Cincinnati Bengals 247. San Francisco 49ers 248. Philadelphia Eagles 249. Detroit Lions (from Kansas City Chiefs) 250. Kansas City Chiefs (compensatory selection) 251. Pittsburgh Steelers (from Los Angeles Rams; compensatory selection) 252. Tampa Bay Buccaneers (compensatory selection) 253. San Francisco 49ers (compensatory selection) 254. New York Giants (compensatory selection) 255. San Francisco 49ers (compensatory selection) 256. Green Bay Packers (compensatory selection) 257. New Orleans Saints (compensatory selection) 258. Chicago Bears (compensatory selection) 259. Houston Texans (compensatory selection)

Jalen Carter is a disruptive defensive lineman with an impressive blend of size, strength, and athleticism. He possesses a quick first step and excellent burst off the snap, allowing him to penetrate gaps and disrupt the backfield. Carter has a rare combination of power and agility, which makes him difficult to handle for blockers. He is versatile enough to play multiple positions along the defensive line and can be a force against both the run and the pass. Carter has active hands and good instincts, allowing him to quickly shed blocks and make tackles. However, he needs to work on pad level and technique to maximize his potential. Overall, Carter is an exciting prospect with a high ceiling and the potential to become a dominant player at the next level. < Back Jalen Carter Georgia HT: 6031 WT: 314 YR: JR POS: IDL OVR RK 2 POS RK CEILING POTENTIAL 1 Near Elite OVR RK PLAYSTYLE & SCHEME FIT In terms of scheme fit, Carter has the ability to excel in a variety of defensive schemes at the NFL level. His combination of size, strength, and athleticism make him well-suited for a 4-3 or 3-4 defensive front, where he can line up at either the nose tackle or defensive tackle positions. He has the ability to anchor against the run and can generate a pass rush from the interior, making him a versatile and valuable asset for any team in need of a disruptive interior defender. CEILING GRADE ANALYSIS Primary scout: Brandon Lundberg KEY STRENGTHS Pos. Speed Strength Versatility KEY WEAKNESSES Double Team Balance Hand Use PLAYER COMPARISONS Aaron Donald Quinnen Williams Javon Hargrave

2025 NFL Combine Day 2 Recap: Nick Emmanwori & Defensive Backs Shine, Tight End Mason Taylor Impresses Day 2 of the 2025 NFL Scouting Combine featured defensive backs and tight ends taking the field in Indianapolis. With several of the top defensive backs participating, today’s session provided a clearer picture of the speed, explosiveness, and range this draft class brings. The cornerback group recorded a historic 4.44-second average in the 40-yard dash, making them the fastest CB group at the Combine since 2003, according to NFL IQ . Meanwhile, safeties like Nick Emmanwori and Malaki Starks showcased elite athleticism in position drills and testing. Below, I break down the standout NFL Combine performances, analyzing their measurements, how they align with scouting reports, and the impact of today’s testing on their draft stock. Day Two 2025 NFL Combine: Who Stood Out? Nick Emmanwori (S, South Carolina) 40-Yard Dash: 4.38 seconds 10-Yard Split: 1.49 seconds Vertical Jump: 43” (Best among SAF) Broad Jump: 11’6” (Tied for 2nd longest by a 220+ lb SAF since 2003) Size: 6’3”, 220 lbs 📌 Scouting Report vs. Combine Performance: Emmanwori entered the Combine as a top 3 safety on our NFL Draft Big Board, and his workout backed up that ranking. His elite blend of size, speed, and explosiveness was on full display. His 4.38-second 40-yard dash at 220 pounds is rare, and his 43-inch vertical and 11’6” broad jump cement his status as one of the best athletes in this class. His top speed of 23.53 mph in the 40-yard dash was tied for the third-fastest among safeties over the last three years. 📈 Draft Stock Impact: Already viewed as a top-30 prospect, Emmanwori’s Combine performance further solidifies his standing as a top 3 safety in this class. His combination of range, ball skills, and physicality makes him an ideal fit for teams needing a versatile defensive back capable of covering tight ends, playing deep, or working in the box. Maxwell Hairston (CB, Kentucky) 40-Yard Dash: 4.28 seconds (Tied for 5th-fastest CB time since 2003) 10-Yard Split: 1.50 seconds Vertical Jump: 39.5” Broad Jump: 10’9” Size: 5’11”, 183 lbs 📌 Scouting Report vs. Combine Performance: Hairston was already known for his elite ball production, but his Combine performance proved that he has the athleticism to match. His 4.28-second 40-yard dash at 183 pounds shows top-end speed, while his 39.5-inch vertical and 10’9” broad jump confirm his explosiveness. His top speed of 24.25 mph on his second 40-yard dash attempt was the fastest of any cornerback at this year’s Combine and one of the fastest in recent Combine history. 📈 Draft Stock Impact: Hairston was a fringe Round 2 prospect entering the Combine, but his testing numbers might push him into the late first or early second-round conversation. Teams looking for a ball-hawking corner with elite recovery speed will take a close look at him. Darien Porter (CB, Iowa State) 40-Yard Dash: 4.30 seconds (Tied for 2nd fastest among CBs) 10-Yard Split: 1.49 seconds Vertical Jump: 36.5” Broad Jump: 10’11” Size: 6’3”, 195 lbs 📌 Scouting Report vs. Combine Performance: Porter’s length (6’3”, 33” arms) and elite speed made him an intriguing prospect entering the Combine, and he confirmed those strengths with outstanding testing numbers. His 4.30-second 40-yard dash was the 2nd fastest among CBs, and his broad jump of 10’11” displayed his lower-body explosion. He reached a top speed of 14.94 mph within the first 5 yards, one of the fastest acceleration marks for any CB over the last three years. 📈 Draft Stock Impact: Porter’s stock was hovering around the early to mid-Day 2 range before the Combine; he solidified his stock with his performance. Robert Longerbeam (CB, Rutgers) 40-Yard Dash: 4.39 seconds 10-Yard Split: 1.50 seconds Vertical Jump: 36.5” Broad Jump: 11’2” (Best among CBs) Size: 5’11”, 175 lbs 📌 Scouting Report vs. Combine Performance: Longerbeam’s elite movement skills and quick burst showed up in testing. His 4.39-second 40-yard dash and 11’2” broad jump confirm his explosiveness and fluidity, making him a strong candidate for slot corner roles at the next level. His footwork and short-area quickness allow him to mirror receivers effectively, but his smaller frame (175 lbs) remains a concern against bigger receivers. 📈 Draft Stock Impact: Longerbeam entered the NFL Combine as a late Day 3 prospect, but his NFL Combine performance could push into the late 3rd or early round 4 discussions. Teams looking for a feisty, athletic nickel corner will have him high on their boards. Malaki Starks (S, Georgia) 40-Yard Dash: 4.50 seconds 10-Yard Split: 1.51 seconds Vertical Jump: 33” Top Speed (Drills): Fastest safety in five different position drills Size: 6’1”, 197 lbs 📌 Scouting Report vs. Combine Performance: Starks was already known for his versatility and high football IQ, and his Combine performance reinforced those traits. While his 4.50-second 40-yard dash was slightly below expectations, he showed elite movement skills in position drills, recording the fastest times of any safety in five separate drills. His short-area quickness, ability to track the ball, and closing speed were all evident in testing. 📈 Draft Stock Impact: Starks remains a top-30 prospect and one of the best all-around safeties in the class. His performance didn’t drastically change his stock, it more or less solidified it. Mason Taylor (TE, LSU) Height/Weight: 6’5”, 251 lbs Arm Length: 32 1/4” Hand Size: 10” Key Drills: Displayed elite hands and fluid movement in gauntlet drill Catch Rate: 98.2% in 2024 (1.8% drop rate) 📌 Scouting Report vs. Combine Performance: Taylor entered the Combine as a high-upside receiving tight end with natural pass-catching ability and NFL bloodlines. His performance in position drills validated his soft hands, tracking ability, and body control, making him one of the most polished route runners in this TE class. While his 40-yard dash time wasn't the focal point, his fluidity in drills, ability to extend for off-target throws, and crisp footwork stood out. 📈 Draft Stock Impact: Taylor was projected as a Day 2 pick (Round 2-3) entering the Combine. I believe he solidified his stock.

< Back Jalen Pitre Baylor HT: 6000 WT: 197 YR: SR POS: S OVR RK 46 POS RK CEILING POTENTIAL 5 High-End Starter Potential OVR RK PLAYSTYLE & SCHEME FIT CEILING GRADE ANALYSIS Primary scout: Brandon Lundberg KEY STRENGTHS KEY WEAKNESSES PLAYER COMPARISONS

2023 NFL Draft QB Rookie Review: C.J. Stroud Is Proving That He Is For Real Reviewing The Top 2023 NFL QB Draft Picks (C.J. Stroud) Below are all available Football Scout 365 pre-draft and post-draft videos related to former Ohio State QB and current Houston Texan QB C.J. Stroud. I also included his 2023 Football Scout 365 predraft scouting report and player comparisons. Profile: Position: Quarterback College: Ohio State Height: 6’3” Weight: 214 pounds Drafted 2nd overall by the Houston Texans in the 2023 NFL Draft NFL Career Start: He accumulated 1,212 passing yards, six touchdowns, and no interceptions in the first four NFL games. Named NFL Offensive Rookie of the Month for the first month of the 2023 season. He became the fifth offensive player in Texans' history to receive this honor. Emerged as a favorite for the NFL's Offensive Rookie of the Year award in 2023. Scouting Report: Known for accuracy and a strong arm, capable of making tight-window throws. Excels in throwing outside the numbers with precise ball placement. Exhibits excellent arm talent, with the ability to throw with touch at all levels. Responds well to pressure but could utilize his mobility more to extend plays. Player Comparisons: Justin Herbert Joe Burrow Matthew Stafford Pre-Draft Concerns: Scored 18 on the S2 cognition test, below the benchmark of 80, causing concern among NFL teams and analysts. Some teams potentially removed him from their draft boards due to the low cognition test score. His pre-draft journey highlighted resilience and sparked debate on the importance of cognitive test scores versus on-field performance. Assessment of C.J. Stroud Based on Early NFL Performance and Scouting Report: C.J. Stroud's early performance in the NFL indicates that his on-field play has effectively countered pre-draft concerns about his cognitive test scores. His ability to deliver a high volume of passing yards and touchdowns without interceptions demonstrates his aptitude for accuracy and strong decision-making—key attributes noted in his scouting report. The lack of interceptions also suggests that, in practice, his cognitive processing on the field is not impeding his performance. His recognition as the Offensive Rookie of the Month and positioning as a favorite for the Offensive Rookie of the Year award further attests to his capacity to translate his college success to the professional level, akin to the player comparisons with Herbert, Burrow, and Stafford. This performance may also contribute to the ongoing discourse about the relevance of cognitive tests in assessing future NFL success. Arm Strength : Stroud's compiled passing yards suggest that he's utilizing his strong arm effectively, possibly executing challenging throws that showcase his ability to make big plays downfield. Mobility : Without specific mention of rushing stats, the lack of interceptions may imply smart decision-making, which could include knowing when to use his mobility to evade pressure or extend plays. Mechanics : The significant yardage and number of touchdowns without interceptions hint at proficient mechanics, indicating that Stroud is able to execute the Texans' playbook with a high level of technical skill. Awareness and Anticipation : Stroud's clean interception record suggests strong on-field awareness and the ability to anticipate defensive actions, indicating that his cognitive processing during games is effective. Ball Placement : A successful early record, including touchdowns and high completion rates, points to accurate ball placement, which is crucial for connecting effectively with receivers and avoiding turnovers. Playstyle & Scheme Fit : Stroud's adaptability and performance suggest that he's well-suited to the Texans' offensive system, which likely takes advantage of his strengths as highlighted in his scouting report. Developmental Grade and Ceiling Potential : The immediate success Stroud has shown in the NFL, particularly being named Rookie of the Month, suggests that he has not only met but may be exceeding the high expectations set for him. In conclusion, C.J. Stroud's early NFL performances have validated the strengths observed in his scouting report. His arm strength, mechanics, and ball placement are contributing to his success with the Houston Texans. His awareness and anticipation appear to be assets despite pre-draft concerns about cognitive testing. Stroud's adaptation to the professional level and his recognition as an outstanding rookie indicate a potentially higher ceiling than initially projected.

Get ahead of the competition with Football Scout 365's expert fantasy football player rankings and analysis. Dominate your league with our insights and expertise. FANTASY FOOTBALL ANALYSIS Brandon Lundberg Dec 2, 2024 Fantasy Football Week 14: Must-Add Waiver Wire Targets to Navigate Late-Season Bye Weeks Brandon Lundberg Nov 25, 2024 Fantasy Football Week 13: Must-Add Waiver Wire Targets to Navigate Late-Season Bye Weeks Brandon Lundberg Nov 18, 2024 Fantasy Football Week 12: Must-Add Waiver Wire & Stash Targets – Marquez Valdes-Scantling, Jonnu Smith Brandon Lundberg Nov 12, 2024 Fantasy Football Week 11: Must-Add Waiver Wire & Stash Targets – Audric Estimé, Jaylen Warren, and More Brandon Lundberg Nov 4, 2024 Fantasy Football Week 10: Must-Add Waiver Wire & Stash Targets - Tua Tagovailoa, Ray Davis, Quentin Johnston, Taysom Hill Brandon Lundberg Oct 28, 2024 Fantasy Football Week 9: Must-Add Waiver Wire & Stash Targets - Jameis Winston, Braelon Allen, Keon Coleman, Mike Gesicki Brandon Lundberg Oct 21, 2024 Fantasy Football Week 8: Must-Add Waiver Wire & Stash Targets - Tua Tagovailoa, Ray Davis, Jauan Jennings, Hunter Henry Brandon Lundberg Oct 14, 2024 Fantasy Football Week 7: Must-Add Waiver Wire & Stash Targets - Drake Maye, Isaac Guerendo, Demario Douglas Brandon Lundberg Oct 7, 2024 Top Fantasy Football Waiver Wire & Trade Targets for Week 6: Caleb Williams, Jaylen Wright, Josh Downs & Tucker Kraft Brandon Lundberg Sep 30, 2024 Top Fantasy Football Waiver Wire & Trade Targets for Week 5: Roschon Johnson, Taysom Hill, Geno Smith & Dontayvion Wicks 1 2 3 4 5

2025 NFL Draft: Way Too Early Top 25 Big Board Rankings, Travis Hunter and Will Johnson Lead the Way Initial Draft Grades and Process Below are my initial 2025 NFL Draft film-based grades and the top 25 player rankings in advance of the 2024 college football season. Each year, I start off by re-evaluating the prior year's grades for players who did not enter the previous draft. Then, I begin to add the additional underclassmen projected as potential high-end NFL Draft prospects. I grade these underclassmen and add them to the 50-60 players I had grades on from the prior year, starting with an initial top 25. Grading Methodology My grading process allows me to remain objective, which is important early in the process because there are many players whose TV copy or all 22 tapes I have yet to watch. With that said, using our proprietary multi-pronged process, I always like to keep my Big Board rankings "way too early" in order of the player grade. These grades can and will change for many prospects as they add additional film in 2024, but for now, this is what I have. 2025 Draft Class Evaluation When evaluating the small sample size for the 2025 NFL Draft class, it is apparent that we are going to see a potential 180 flip from the 2024 offensively heavy NFL Draft, at least in the first round. The 2024 NFL Draft had zero defenders come off the board until Laiatu Latu at 15th overall, a first in NFL Draft history. If it were not for the need at the QB position in the NFL, the 2025 NFL Draft class could see as many as eight defenders off the board in the first ten picks with zero skill players off the board. That will not happen because of QB positional value and WR positional value, but there is a solid chance we see a 50-50 split in the top ten and a much heavier defensive draft on day one than we had in the 2024 NFL Draft. Here is a breakdown by position group for the below top 25 rankings: CB (Cornerback): 4 IDL (Interior Defensive Line): 4 ED (Edge Defender): 4 OT (Offensive Tackle): 3 WR (Wide Receiver): 3 QB (Quarterback): 3 S (Safety): 1 LB (Linebacker): 1 TE (Tight End): 1 RB (Running Back): 1 The Way Too Early 2025 NFL Draft Big Board Rankings 1). Travis Hunter, Colorado (CB, 6'1", 185 lbs) Projection: Elite Analysis: Travis Hunter stands out as a dynamic defensive talent, excelling as a shutdown cornerback with the versatility to also play safety. His combination of speed, athleticism, and physicality allows him to match up with any receiver, embodying a fearless approach. Drawing parallels to legends like Deion Sanders, Charles Woodson, and Devin Hester, Hunter mirrors their knack for playmaking. Overall, Hunter is a rare two-way talent with the potential to become a generational figure in the league. 2). Mason Graham, Michigan (IDL, 6'3", 318 lbs) Projection: Elite Analysis: Mason Graham primarily aligns as a 3-technique, showing versatility to position as a 1-technique, and occasionally plays outside the offensive tackle, with limited snaps in a more traditional defensive end or off-ball role. His strength at the point of attack and ability to disrupt both the pass and run game make him an ideal fit for defensive schemes that utilize defensive tackles in multiple roles, such as 4-3 systems where he can be a disruptive under-tackle, or in 3-4 systems as a versatile defensive end. 3). Will Johnson, Michigan (CB, 6'2", 205 lbs) Projection: Elite Analysis: A quintessential lockdown corner, Johnson can effectively erase half the field, granting defensive coordinators greater creativity with coverage schemes and blitzes. Will Johnson primarily aligns as an outside cornerback, with notable experience in the slot as well. His skill set and physical build make him an ideal fit for a team that employs a mix of man and zone coverages, where his length and agility can be best utilized. 4). James Pearce Jr., Tennessee (ED, 6'5", 245 lbs) Projection: Near Elite Analysis: James Pearce Jr. is an elite-level pass-rushing outside linebacker who excels not only in pressuring the quarterback but can also drop back into coverage. His physical traits and aggressive play style make him ideally suited for a 3-4 scheme as an outside linebacker, where he can leverage his speed and length to disrupt both passing and running plays. 5). Will Campbell, LSU (OT, 6'6", 325 lbs) Projection: Near Elite Analysis: Will Campbell has established himself as a premier left tackle, excelling in both pass protection and run blocking. His athleticism and technique allow him to effectively protect the quarterback's blind side and create lanes in the run game. He has shown versatility and consistency, making him an ideal fit for both zone and power running schemes due to his ability to engage and drive through defenders. His experience in a high-caliber collegiate program prepares him well for various offensive systems in the NFL. 6). Benjamin Morrison, Notre Dame (CB, 6'0", 185 lbs) Projection: Near Elite Analysis: Morrison thrives as an outside man/press cornerback, a role that capitalizes on his quick, short-area movements and ability to stay with receivers through routes. His physical style and agility make him ideal for teams looking for a cornerback who can handle top receivers one-on-one. Morrison's skills suggest he would fit best in defensive schemes that prioritize press and man coverage, where his ability to disrupt at the line of scrimmage and play physically downfield can be most effective. 7). Kenneth Grant, Michigan (IDL, 6'3", 340 lbs) Projection: Near Elite Analysis: Kenneth Grant has shown substantial growth in his ability to perform in various defensive alignments, indicating his adaptability and understanding of the game. Predominantly effective in the B gap, he demonstrates a profound impact against the run and in disrupting the pocket. His capabilities in the pass rush have increasingly been utilized, showcasing his versatility and potential adaptability to different NFL schemes. Grant would be particularly effective as a 3-technique in a 4-3 defense, leveraging his pass rush skills, or could serve well in a 3-4 scheme as a defensive end where his broad skill set can be utilized across the line. 8). Kelvin Banks, Texas (OT, 6'4", 324 lbs) Projection: Near Elite Analysis: Kelvin Banks Jr. exemplifies a modern offensive tackle with his light-footed agility and excellent balance. His play style suits a zone-blocking scheme particularly well, due to his ability to move laterally and engage moving targets in space. However, he has the raw attributes to adapt to a power scheme with further development in his strength and hand technique. 9). Deone Walker, Kentucky (IDL, 6'6", 348 lbs) Projection: Near Elite Analysis: Deone Walker is a versatile defensive lineman who can operate as a 1-tech nose tackle, a 3-tech IDL, or a 3-4 defensive end. His large frame, raw strength, and surprising agility are why he is rated so highly. Combining the attributes above with Walker's ability to occupy multiple blockers makes him a valuable asset in any defensive scheme at the NFL level. 10). Ashton Gillotte, Louisville (ED, 6'3", 270 lbs) Projection: High-End Starter Potential Analysis: Ashton Gillotte exhibits a dynamic blend of speed and power, making him a formidable force on the defensive line. His ability to generate quick pressure on quarterbacks through his explosive first step and bend around the edge is a critical asset. Gillotte's physical style and versatility make him an excellent fit in both 3-4 and 4-3 defensive alignments, as he has shown proficiency in playing across different positions on the line. 11). Luther Burden, Missouri (WR, 5'11", 208 lbs) Projection: High-End Starter Potential Analysis: Luther Burden III is a dynamic multi-role receiver who excels in a high-tempo, pass-oriented offense. His ability to perform after the catch and his nuanced route running make him a fit for both spread and West Coast offensive schemes. His physicality and competitive nature also make him valuable in situations where tough catches are required. 12). Malaki Starks, Georgia (S, 6'1", 205 lbs) Projection: Near Elite Analysis: Malaki Starks exhibits a balanced skill set that suits both man and zone coverage, making him versatile as a safety. His ability to read the quarterback and diagnose plays quickly is notable. Starks has shown effectiveness in slot/nickel situations, suggesting he could fit well in schemes that value multidimensional defensive backs who can cover, tackle, and play the ball. His experience and growing knowledge of defensive schemes, coupled with physical and mental development, indicate a strong adaptability to various defensive schemes at the NFL level. 13). Princely Umanmielen, Ole Miss (ED, 6'5", 255 lbs) Projection: High-End Starter Potential Analysis: Umanmielen's diverse skill set makes him suitable for both 3-4 and 4-3 defensive schemes. His ability to play with his hand in the dirt as a traditional defensive end in a 4-3 alignment, as well as his capability to stand up as an outside linebacker in a 3-4 front, highlights his versatility. Teams operating hybrid defenses would particularly benefit from his skill set, allowing them to utilize his strengths in multiple alignments depending on the game situation. 14). Tetairoa McMillan, Arizona (WR, 6'5", 210 lbs) Projection: High-End Starter Potential Analysis: Tetairoa McMillan primarily plays as an outside X-receiver, showcasing remarkable athleticism and a physical profile akin to NFL star Mike Evans. His playmaking ability and size make him an ideal fit for offenses that leverage deep threat receivers and require versatile play from the wide receiver position. His ability to create separation using his physicality and route precision complements vertical passing schemes well. 15). Harold Perkins, LSU (LB, 6'1", 250 lbs) Projection: Near Elite Analysis: Harold Perkins is a dynamic linebacker with a knack for being around the ball and making plays, particularly in the box. Despite his relatively smaller size for an edge rusher, his performance has not been hindered, as evidenced by his freshman season, where he tallied 7.5 sacks and continued to excel into his sophomore year with significant tackles for loss and sacks. He's shown adaptability in shifting from edge rushing to playing more centrally as an inside linebacker under LSU's scheme, which speaks to his versatility and potential fit in various defensive schemes at the professional level. 16). Shedeur Sanders, Colorado (QB, 6'2", 215 lbs) Projection: High-End Starter Potential Analysis: Shedeur Sanders is a mobile pocket passer with a remarkable ability to extend plays and improvise under pressure. He demonstrates consistent accuracy and timing on short to medium passes. Sanders has shown proficiency in navigating the pocket, using his athleticism effectively, and maintaining composure under pressure. However, his arm strength is considered average, and his footwork and overall throwing mechanics require refinement. 17). J.T. Tuimoloau, Ohio State (ED, 6'4", 270 lbs) Projection: High-End Starter Potential Analysis: In terms of scheme fit, Tuimoloau's combination of physical traits, pursuit abilities, and hand usage should allow him to fit well into multiple defensive schemes. While his primary role is likely to be as an edge rusher, his strengths against the run suggest that he could be used in a variety of ways depending on the defensive scheme and situation. 18). Emeka Egbuka, Ohio State (WR, 6'1", 205 lbs) Projection: High-End Starter Potential Analysis: Egbuka exhibits a play style that combines elite speed, agile route running, and the ability to make plays after the catch. His ability to perform both in the slot and on the outside makes him a versatile asset for any NFL team. Egbuka fits well in a spread offense that leverages his route-running skills and speed, making him a potent threat across all levels of the field. 19). Jonah Savaiinaea, Arizona (OT, 6'5", 330 lbs) Projection: Mid-Level Starter Potential Analysis: Jonah Savaiinaea is a massive offensive tackle who can also slot into an interior guard position if needed, showcasing versatility across the offensive line. His size and strength are his biggest assets, making him ideal for a power run scheme that leverages his ability to move defenders off the ball. His pass protection skills are advanced, particularly against bull rushes, but he must improve his agility and footwork to handle speed rushers at the NFL level. Savaiinaea's performance at Arizona has demonstrated significant potential for growth, especially in schemes that prioritize physical run blocking. 20). Carson Beck, Georgia (QB, 6'4", 220 lbs) Projection: Mid-Level Starter Potential Analysis: Carson Beck is a prototypical pocket passer with a poised and methodical approach to the game. He is most effective when given time to operate within the pocket, utilizing his strong arm and accuracy to execute the offense. Beck fits best in a pro-style offense that leverages his ability to make throws from the pocket and doesn't rely heavily on quarterback mobility. His play style is reminiscent of traditional drop-back passers, and he would excel in schemes that value precision passing and structured play designs. 21). Howard Cross III, Notre Dame (IDL, 6'0", 288 lbs) Projection: High-End Starter Potential Analysis: Howard Cross III is a powerful and stout interior defensive lineman, known for his ability to disrupt the run game. He has a solid build and uses his strength effectively to engage and shed blocks. While his pass rush skills are more limited, he shows potential in this area. Cross fits best in a 4-3 defensive scheme as a run-stopping DT, where his ability to plug gaps and control the line of scrimmage would be maximized. 22). Noah Fifita, Arizona (QB, 5'11", 196 lbs) Projection: Mid-Level Starter Potential Analysis: Noah Fifita is a quintessential pocket passer with a knack for precision and timing, making him a fit for pro-style or West Coast offenses that prioritize accuracy and decision-making over deep throws. His ability to read defenses and distribute the ball effectively makes him adaptable to various offensive schemes. Fifita is also an escape artist with good mobility. He can navigate the pocket to make a throw, keep a play alive to make throws outside of structure, or take off to pick up yards as a runner. 23). Tacario Davis, Arizona (CB, 6'4", 195 lbs) Projection: Mid-Level Starter Potential Analysis: Tacario Davis has flourished in a system that emphasizes heavy zone coverage, where his length and speed allow him to excel. Standing at 6-foot-4, he is a dominant physical presence on the field, capable of matching up against larger receivers. 24). Colston Loveland, Michigan (TE, 6'5", 245 lbs) Projection: High-End Starter Potential Analysis: Colston Loveland is a prototypical modern NFL tight end, effective as both a pass-catcher and a blocker. He thrives in an offense that utilizes the tight end as a key part of its passing game, similar to how Michigan has employed him. His ability to line up in multiple positions makes him a valuable asset for schemes that favor versatile tight ends who can create mismatches. 25). Donovan Edwards, Michigan (RB, 6'1", 210 lbs) Projection: High-End Starter Potential Analysis: Donovan Edwards is a talented running back, offering a great mix of speed, agility, and explosiveness. As a three-down back, Edwards brings valuable versatility to the field, where he can line up in the backfield, the slot, or split out wide as a receiver. Edwards's versatility could have allowed him to change positions from RB to WR a season ago, with Blake Corum gobbling up most of the backfield carries. He is exactly what NFL scouts and GM’s are looking for in today's NFL game at the RB position. Players like Donovan Edwards provide positionless versatility, and that's the direction in which the RB position appears to be trending.

Hayes has a good frame for an offensive tackle, standing at 6'7" and weighing around 300 pounds. He has good length and a solid build, with the potential to add more muscle mass as he continues to develop. Hayes has decent footwork and agility for his size, which allows him to move well in pass protection. Hayes has good athleticism for his size, with decent quickness and agility. He is able to move laterally and has good footwork in pass protection. However, he could benefit from improving his speed and explosiveness, particularly when getting to the second level on running plays. He could benefit from improving his hand strength and explosiveness, but he has the foundation to be a successful player at the next level. < Back Ryan Hayes Michigan HT: 6070 WT: 307 YR: SR POS: OT OVR RK 69 POS RK CEILING POTENTIAL 10 Low-Level Starter Potential OVR RK PLAYSTYLE & SCHEME FIT Pro Style/LT CEILING GRADE ANALYSIS Primary scout: Brandon Lundberg KEY STRENGTHS Length Strong Latch Athleticism KEY WEAKNESSES First Step Quickness Balance Bend PLAYER COMPARISONS