Search Results

The 2025 quarterback class lacks a generational No. 1 overall lock like in recent years, but one name has finally separated from the pack. Cam Ward has surged to the top of the board with his elite arm talent, poise under pressure, and dynamic off-platform playmaking—cementing himself as QB1 and a likely No. 1 overall pick. Meanwhile, Shedeur Sanders remains a close second, offering high-level field vision, accuracy, and decision-making that fits today’s rhythm-based NFL offenses. Though stylistically different, both bring franchise potential in the right systems. Behind them, a wide range of developmental and pro-ready quarterbacks offer varying traits—mobility, toughness, arm strength, and poise. This class might lack a Trevor Lawrence-type generational talent, but it has depth and intrigue, particularly with scheme-specific fits and long-term upside. 2025 NFL Draft: Quarterback Rankings Near Elite Tier - 1st Round Projection Prospects in this tier possess elite physical tools and production but may need refinement or have slight limitations preventing them from reaching the “Elite” category. 1) Cam Ward | Miami | Ht: 6'2" | Wt: 220 lbs Player Comparison:   Justin Fields meets Josh Allen (without the size) Analysis:  Ward is a dynamic, fearless passer with elite off-platform ability, arm angles, and downfield aggression. He showed outstanding poise and growth at Miami, elevating his NFL readiness. The gap between him and the rest of the class has widened post-Pro Day. A perfect fit for vertical, play-extending offensive systems. High-Level Starter Potential – Late 1st to Early 2nd Round Projection A high-floor, pro-ready quarterback with advanced processing, accuracy, and poise. Lacks elite traits but has the tools to thrive early in the right structure. 2) Shedeur Sanders | Colorado | Ht: 6'2" | Wt: 215 lbs Player Comparison:  Joe Burrow Ceiling, with Andy Dalton floor Analysis:  Sanders is a polished pocket passer with elite ball placement, field vision, and anticipation. His ability to dissect defenses in a rhythm-based offense makes him a high-floor prospect. However, he must improve his pocket movement and ability to avoid sacks to maximize his potential as an NFL starter. Mid-Level Starter Potential - 2nd/3rd Round Projection A projected starter with strong physical tools and solid mechanics. While they have some limitations, development can elevate them into a consistent impact player. 3) Tyler Shough | Louisville | Ht: 6'5" | Wt: 225 lbs Player Comparison:  Not Available Analysis:  Shough has the ideal size, arm strength, and mobility for the NFL. His ability to operate within play-action and RPO-heavy systems makes him an intriguing prospect. However, durability concerns and inconsistency have hampered his development, making him a high-upside project rather than a plug-and-play starter. 4) Jaxson Dart | Ole Miss | Ht: 6'2" | Wt: 220 lbs Player Comparison:  Gardner Minshew Analysis:  Dart is a tough, athletic quarterback with a quick release and a strong arm. He excels in RPO-heavy offenses where his fast decision-making and quick processing shine. However, he needs to improve his deep-ball accuracy and full-field reads to become a long-term NFL starter. 5) Quinn Ewers | Texas | Ht: 6'2" | Wt: 206 lbs Player Comparison:  Derek Carr (Maybe) Analysis:  Ewers is a naturally gifted passer with a quick release and high-level touch on throws at all three levels. He thrives in structured offenses but struggles with pocket awareness, deep-ball consistency, and ball security. His ability to develop within a system will determine his long-term ceiling. 6) Will Howard | Ohio State | Ht: 6'4" | Wt: 235 lbs Player Comparison:  Ryan Tannehill Analysis:  Howard has intriguing size, arm strength, and athleticism, making him a solid developmental prospect. He thrives in vertical passing attacks but needs refinement in accuracy, mechanics, and decision-making under pressure. His potential as a dual-threat QB adds value to his projection. 7) Kyle McCord | Syracuse | Ht: 6'3" | Wt: 224 lbs Player Comparison:  Kirk Cousins Analysis:  McCord is a mechanically sound pocket passer with high-level timing and accuracy. He fits well in structured offenses that emphasize quick decision-making. His lack of mobility and struggles under pressure cap his ceiling, but he has the tools to be a reliable game manager. Low-Level Starter Potential - 4th/7th Round Projection A developmental quarterback who has physical traits or experience but lacks the complete skill set to be a long-term franchise solution. 8) Jalen Milroe | Alabama | Ht: 6'2" | Wt: 220 lbs Player Comparison:  Lamar Jackson (lite) Analysis:  Milroe is an elite athlete with dynamic rushing ability and a powerful arm. His upside as a modern dual-threat QB is enticing, but he must refine his pocket presence, accuracy, and decision-making under pressure to become a consistent NFL starter. Best suited for a system incorporating designed QB runs and RPOs. 9) Dillon Gabriel | Oregon | Ht: 6'0" | Wt: 200 lbs Player Comparison:  Gardner Minshew Analysis:  Gabriel is a smart, timing-based passer who thrives in RPO-heavy offenses. His short-to-intermediate accuracy and ability to process quickly make him a great fit for a spread or West Coast scheme. However, his average arm strength and lack of top-tier athleticism limit his ceiling as a high-end starter. 10) Kurtis Rourke | Indiana | Ht: 6'5" | Wt: 223 lbs Player Comparison:  Philip Rivers Analysis:  Rourke possesses great size, touch, and field vision. He operates well in structured offenses that emphasize quick, on-time throws and vertical play-action shots. His mobility and pocket movement need improvement, but his arm talent and processing ability give him long-term upside. Backup Level – Day 3 Projection or Priority UDFA Developmental quarterbacks with physical tools, experience, or intangibles but lacking the consistency, traits, or upside to be long-term starters. 11) Riley Leonard | Notre Dame | Ht: 6'4" | Wt: 216 lbs Player Comparison:  Not Available Analysis:  Leonard is an intriguing blend of size, mobility, and arm strength. He fits well in pro-style offenses that emphasize play-action and vertical throws. His ability to extend plays adds value, but inconsistent ball placement and decision-making make him a long-term project rather than an immediate contributor.

With less than a month to go before the 2025 NFL Draft, the all-star circuit and NFL Combine are officially behind us, and Pro Days are nearly complete. Now comes the stretch where draft boards start to lock in — and ours is no different. Explore the full NFL Draft Big Board, including advanced scouting data, player comparisons, and scheme fits:🔗 Click Here In this updated Top 50 Big Board, we’re going beyond rankings. We’ve tiered each prospect based on our proprietary Football Scout 365 Grade Scale, which evaluates positional value, play style, ceiling, and NFL projection. These tiers provide clearer insight into where a player is likely to be drafted — and why. Understanding the Tiers Each tier gives teams a way to prioritize traits over rankings, especially when deciding between a high-upside prospect versus a plug-and-play contributor. It’s not just about who ranks higher — it’s about projected impact based on tier and role fit. Elite Tier (75+) NFL Draft Projection: Top 5–10 Picks (Round 1) These are rare, instant-impact prospects — high-level athletes with elite physical tools, advanced processing, and dominant tape. They’re foundational players, often viewed as future All-Pros. Near Elite Tier (70–74) NFL Draft Projection: Mid-to-Late Round 1 These are high-ceiling players who may not check every box today but project as Year 1 or Year 2 starters with Pro Bowl potential. They often dominate one or more key traits and just need polish or scheme fit. High-End Starter Tier (65–69) NFL Draft Projection: Round 2–3 These are strong Day 2 talents with starter-level athleticism, IQ, and skill. They may have one or two key limitations, but with the right development, can become reliable NFL starters within a few seasons. Top 5 Overall Rankings – Tier 1 Standouts The No. 1 overall player on our board remains Mason Graham (IDL, Michigan). His elite leverage, violent hands, and short-area burst make him a disruptive force in any front. Graham profiles as a high-floor, high-ceiling impact player from Day 1. Abdul Carter (EDGE, Penn State)  holds firm at No. 2 overall. He offers top-tier explosion, bend, and versatility — a true game-wrecker whether aligned as a 3-4 OLB or 4-3 DE. At No. 3, Travis Hunter (Colorado)  returns to the ATH designation. If declared a WR, he’d rank as WR1. As a CB, he could challenge for CB1. Until his position is officially defined at the next level, he remains the most dynamic, scheme-flexible prospect in the class — and sits as our ATH1. Notable Changes Since Our Last Update Cam Ward  has ascended into the Top 10 and taken over as QB1. A deeper evaluation of his 2024 All-22 tape and side-by-side comparison with Shedeur Sanders confirmed Ward’s elite arm talent and creation ability. While Sanders is a more controlled, cerebral quarterback in the mold of Brock Purdy, Ward’s ceiling is simply on another level. At running back, Omarion Hampton  has overtaken TreVeyon Henderson for the RB2 spot. Ashton Jeanty remains RB1, but the gap has closed. Hampton’s power, balance, and three-down ability make him a fit across multiple schemes. Positional Breakdown – Defense Stacks the Top 50 This class is defensive-heavy at the top, particularly along the front seven. Of the 50 total players, 20 hold first-round grades, all landing in the Elite or Near Elite tiers. Here’s how the Top 50 shakes out by position: What stands out? 16 of the top 50 grades belong to players in the front seven (EDGE, IDL, LB) — signaling that NFL teams seeking defensive tone-setters will have a deep crop to choose from. This is a trench-driven, defensive-first draft, and the best value may come early on the defensive side of the ball. Position Total Prospects EDGE 7 CB 7 OT 7 IDL 6 WR 6 RB 3 S 3 LB 3 IOL 3 QB 2 TE 2 ATH 1 Top 50 NFL Draft Big Board Rankings Elite Tier (75+) NFL Draft Projection: Top 5–10 Picks (1st Round) A rare, high-impact prospect with the potential to be an instant NFL star. These players possess elite physical tools, high-level athleticism, and exceptional football intelligence. 1). Mason Graham, IDL, Michigan Graham is a disruptive interior force with elite pad level, violent hands, and short-area quickness. He wins with leverage, power, and refined technique. Projects as a Day 1 impact starter in a 4-3 or 3-4 front. 2). Abdul Carter, EDGE, Penn State Carter’s first-step explosion, bend, and violent hands give him rare EDGE upside. His off-ball linebacker background adds coverage versatility. Immediate starter with Pro Bowl potential. 3). Travis Hunter, ATH, Colorado A two-way phenom with elite instincts, ball skills, and burst. Whether as CB or WR, Hunter is a scheme-versatile game-changer who can impact every snap. A true top-five talent. 4). Ashton Jeanty, RB, Boise State Jeanty’s vision, contact balance, and home-run ability make him a franchise-caliber back. Dominant in zone schemes with receiving upside. Instant contributor with elite tools. 5). Will Johnson, CB, Michigan Johnson brings size, fluid hips, and elite ball skills. He thrives in zone or off-man coverage and offers physicality in run support. A plug-and-play CB1 with All-Pro upside. Near Elite Tier (70–74) NFL Draft Projection: Mid-to-Late 1st Round A high-caliber prospect who is expected to become a significant contributor by Year 2. These players have outstanding physical tools and strong football IQ, with only minor flaws in their game. 6). Mike Green, EDGE, Marshall A twitchy pass rusher with elite burst and advanced hand usage. Green's speed-to-power and ability to bend the edge make him a nightmare in one-on-one situations. Projects as a three-down edge in either front. 7). Will Campbell, OT, LSU A physical, scheme-versatile lineman with excellent anchor strength and footwork. Campbell has tackle/guard flexibility and projects as a Day 1 starter with long-term Pro Bowl potential. 8). Jahdae Barron, CB, Texas Barron thrives in zone coverage with great play recognition and ball skills. He’s also physical in run support, making him a versatile nickel or outside option in multiple coverages. 9). Cam Ward, QB, Miami Ward is an athletic passer with elite arm talent and off-platform creativity. While his decision-making can be erratic, he offers upside in vertical offenses that embrace improvisation and big-play potential. 10). Colston Loveland, TE, Michigan Loveland blends size, athleticism, and route-running ability. A mismatch weapon who can flex out or play in-line, he’s a vertical stretch threat with room to grow as a blocker. 11). Tyler Warren, TE, Penn State Warren is a rugged, well-rounded tight end with in-line blocking ability and red-zone value. He aligns in multiple spots and brings day-one starter traits for 12-personnel-heavy schemes. 12). Malaki Starks, S, Georgia A rangy safety with instincts and versatility to play single-high, split-zone, or box. Starks flashes elite closing speed and playmaking range, with minor lapses in eye discipline. 13). Jalon Walker, LB, Georgia A versatile linebacker with pass-rush juice and explosive range. Best in hybrid roles where he can attack downhill and contribute as a situational blitzer or SAM backer. 14). Tyler Booker, IOL, Alabama Booker is a mauling guard with a nasty streak and dominant power at the point of attack. He thrives in gap schemes and could start early in his career if pass-pro technique improves. 15). Shemar Stewart, EDGE, Texas A&M Physically gifted with elite length and raw strength. Stewart plays with violence but must refine his pass-rush moves. High-upside DE for even or odd fronts with development. 16). Tetairoa McMillan, WR, Arizona A towering outside receiver with elite catch radius and body control. Not a burner, but his smooth release and physicality make him a vertical threat in downfield passing attacks. 17). Omarion Hampton, RB, North Carolina A downhill bruiser with great contact balance and short-area burst. Ideal for gap/power schemes, he offers three-down potential with added development in the passing game. 18). Kelvin Banks Jr., OT, Texas Technically sound with excellent footwork and reactive quickness. Banks is a plug-and-play tackle who excels in both pass protection and zone run concepts. 19). Shavon Revel, CB, ECU Long and fluid with elite traits for press-man coverage. Injuries aside, Revel has lockdown potential on the perimeter thanks to his physicality and movement skills. 20). Benjamin Morrison, CB, Notre Dame A sticky man cover corner with top-tier instincts and fluid hips. Morrison excels at mirroring and disrupting routes at the line, with proven production against top WRs. High-End Starter Potential (65–69) NFL Draft Projection: 2nd–3rd Round A player expected to become a top-tier starter within their first few years. They possess strong physical tools and good technical skills but may have some limitations in their game. With development, they can reach near-elite levels and provide consistent impact at their position. 21). Kenneth Grant, IDL, Michigan Grant is a massive, athletic defensive tackle with impressive quickness for his size and dominant run-stopping ability. His power and first-step quickness allow him to collapse the pocket, but his pass-rush plan and pad level need improvement. Best suited as a nose tackle in a 3-4 or a 1-tech in a 4-3. 22). Mykel Williams, EDGE, Georgia Williams is an alignment-versatile edge rusher with the tools to be a premier NFL defender. His usage in Georgia’s complex front showcases his potential in multiple roles, projecting best as a 4-3 DE or 3-4 OLB. 23). James Pearce Jr., EDGE, Tennessee Pearce has explosive get-off and fluid athleticism, thriving as a stand-up or hand-in-the-dirt pass rusher. His versatility, speed, and counters make him a mismatch weapon in multiple fronts. 25). Luther Burden, WR, Missouri A dynamic slot receiver with elite YAC skills, Burden fits best in motion-heavy or spread schemes that get him touches in space. His burst and twitch make him a high-upside offensive weapon. 26). Armand Membou, OL, Missouri A powerful and athletic lineman with tackle/guard versatility. Membou fits well in zone-heavy schemes but could thrive as a guard in a power-run offense due to his hand strength and finish. 27). Nick Emmanwori, SAF, South Carolina A physical hybrid safety/linebacker with great size, range, and tackling ability. Best suited for big nickel or box roles in a multiple-front defense, especially against TEs and in zone coverage. 28). Matthew Golden, WR, Texas Golden brings vertical juice, sharp route-running, and body control. Ideal as a Z-receiver in spread or rhythm-based offenses. Offers WR1 upside with development. 29). Azareye’h Thomas, CB, Florida State Thomas has elite length and press potential. A great fit for Cover 3 or press-man schemes that value size and physicality at the line, though speed questions temper his ceiling. 30). Walter Nolen, IDL, Ole Miss Nolen is a powerful interior disruptor with quick hands and speed-to-power ability. His high motor and scheme versatility make him a potential Pro Bowl-caliber 3-tech or 4i. 31). Jaylin Noel, WR, Iowa State Noel thrives in the slot with crisp route running and quick separation. His agility and special teams ability make him an immediate contributor in West Coast or spread schemes. 32). Donovan Jackson, IOL, Ohio State Jackson is an athletic, technically sound interior lineman ideal for zone-blocking schemes. He has the strength and mobility to excel in either zone or gap-based systems. 33). Donovan Ezeiruaku, EDGE, Boston College A bendy, finesse rusher with advanced hands and pass-rush counters. Projects best in sub-packages or as a stand-up OLB in a blitz-heavy 3-4. Rotational now, with every-down upside. 34). Josh Simmons, OT, Ohio State Simmons offers fluidity, foot speed, and versatility to play either tackle spot. Injuries and anchor inconsistencies are concerns, but he’s a developmental starter in zone-heavy systems. 35). Josh Conerly Jr., OT, Oregon A smooth pass protector with zone-run fit. Needs to develop functional strength, but has the tools to start at left tackle early with Pro Bowl ceiling in athletic systems. 36). Darius Alexander, IDL, Toledo A disruptive run defender with strong hands and burst. Ideal 3-tech in 4-3 or rotational DT in a 3-4. Consistency and motor are areas for growth. 37). TreVeyon Henderson, RB, Ohio State A big-play threat with elite burst and second-level vision. Fits best in wide zone or spread offenses. Durability and pass protection are concerns but RB1 traits are evident. 38). Emeka Egbuka, WR, Ohio State Egbuka is a refined slot technician with natural hands and YAC ability. He excels in rhythm-based schemes and has WR2/3 value in the right offense. 39). Jihaad Campbell, LB, Alabama Campbell is a fast, athletic linebacker with coverage upside and pass-rush tools. Needs to develop block-shedding and play recognition to reach full three-down potential. 40). Aireontae Ersery, OT, Minnesota Ersery is a long, athletic tackle with the size and strength to succeed in zone-heavy and play-action offenses. He needs refinement in hand usage and anchor but has high-end starter potential with coaching. 41). Wyatt Milum, OL, West Virginia Milum is a rugged, powerful lineman with tackle/guard flexibility. His grip strength and play demeanor fit gap schemes, though lateral agility and technique refinement will be key at the next level. 42). Trey Amos, CB, Mississippi A physical press-man corner with excellent length and instincts in zone. Amos fits well in Cover 3 or man-heavy schemes but must clean up eye discipline to avoid bite on double moves. 43). Xavier Watts, SAF, Notre Dame Watts brings elite football IQ and ball skills with a WR background. Best in split-zone or box roles. Limited range and man quickness are concerns, but he’s an early starter with big-play upside. 44). Jack Sawyer, EDGE, Ohio State Sawyer is a high-effort edge rusher with power and agility. While he’s not a bendy, twitchy athlete, he fits as a sturdy base end in 4-3 fronts or as a rotational edge with three-down potential. 45). Jayden Higgins, WR, Iowa State A big, smooth possession target with strong hands and savvy route running. He excels vs. zone but lacks explosiveness and struggles vs. press. Projects best as a WR3 in West Coast systems. 46). Carson Schwesinger, LB, UCLA Schwesinger is a smart, agile linebacker who reads keys well and excels in coverage. His sideline-to-sideline range is ideal for a WILL role, though he needs strength gains to handle NFL blocks. 47). Grey Zabel, IOL, North Dakota State A gritty, athletic interior lineman who thrives in zone-blocking schemes. Zabel projects best at center or guard. Needs technical refinement but has strong anchor and starter upside by Year 2. 48). Maxwell Hairston, CB, Kentucky A high-IQ zone corner with elite anticipation and ball skills. Best fit in Cover 2/Cover 3, but press limitations and long speed restrict versatility. Still, his instincts give him clear starter upside. 49). T.J. Sanders, IDL, South Carolina Sanders is a disruptive interior pass rusher with elite first-step quickness. He projects best as a 3-tech in an aggressive front but must improve vs. double teams to become a full-time anchor. 50). Derrick Harmon, IDL, Oregon Harmon is a stout, powerful interior lineman with three-down potential. His scheme versatility and ability to hold the point make him a valuable asset. Projects best as a 2i or 3-tech in hybrid fronts.

About Cole Grossman A native of Vancouver, Washington, Cole Grossman’s path to the NFL is as much about perseverance as it is about performance. A two-sport athlete at Skyview High School — starring as both a wide receiver and defensive end while also playing basketball — Grossman’s blend of athleticism and toughness was evident early. Despite flying under the national radar, he landed at Montana, where he quickly became one of the most productive tight ends in the FCS. 2025 NFL Draft Prospect: Cole Grossman Height:  6'4" | Weight:  235 lbs | Arm Length:  TBD | Hand Size:  TBD | 40-Yard Dash:  4.67 (Est.) | 10-Yard Split:  TBD Grossman earned Freshman All-American (2021) and Sophomore All-American (2022) honors from HERO Sports, posting 69 receptions for 897 yards and 10 touchdowns across those two seasons. But his story goes far beyond the box score. After dealing with multiple injuries — including two meniscus tears prior to the 2024 season — Grossman faced a devastating NCAA suspension in early 2024 after taking prescribed Clomid for medically diagnosed hypogonadism. Despite full disclosure and proper protocols, his medical exemption was denied, limiting him to just five games. In his final appearance of the season against SDSU, Grossman suffered a torn ACL, adding another hurdle to his already challenging journey. Even during his suspension, Grossman remained with the team, attending every practice and film session. His ACL injury upon reinstatement only added to the adversity. While he’s not yet fully recovered, he’s preparing for his April 3rd Pro Day, where he’ll meet with NFL scouts. Grossman is ready to prove he still belongs in the NFL conversation. Tale of The Tape Grossman’s game is built on reliable hands, crisp route-running, and advanced spatial awareness. At 6'4" and now weighing in at 235 pounds, he brings impressive physicality and versatility, functioning well from multiple alignments. His body control and refined technique allow him to separate from linebackers and absorb contact at the catch point. At first glance, as a leaner tight end, you might expect him to struggle as an in-line blocker—but he often held his own. Montana frequently relied on him in that role, and he consistently gave strong effort. He projects best as a versatile move tight end or H-back in a modern spread offense—someone who can be motioned to create mismatches and exploited in space. If he can add functional weight and reach the 240-pound range without sacrificing too much speed, it would significantly elevate his next-level potential. Advanced Stats & Analytics Breakdown Grossman’s productivity isn’t just backed by accolades — the advanced data confirms his value and potential upside: 2021 (Redshirt Freshman Season): PFF Overall Grade:  22nd among FCS TEs with 25+ targets Receiving Grade:  14th among FCS TEs Pass Protection Grade:  19th — impressive for a leaner framed TE Run Blocking Grade:  Below average, but had 375 run-blocking reps Yards After Catch (YAC):  230 of 463 yards (8th most among FCS TEs) Yards Per Route Run:  1.22 (26th among FCS TEs with 25+ targets) Drops:  Just 1 drop in 13 games Alignment:  70% inline, 28% slot, 2% wide Grossman was used primarily inline but created serious damage after the catch — a testament to his WR background. His YAC efficiency and low drop rate make him one of the more polished receiving options at the position in his class. 2022 (Redshirt Sophomore Season): PFF Overall Grade:  29th among FCS TEs with 25+ targets Receiving Grade:  31st Pass Blocking Grade:  Top 5 among all FCS TEs — significant improvement Run Blocking Grade:  Average to below average (349 blocking snaps) Forced Missed Tackles:  8 (Top 10 among FCS TEs) Alignment:  60% inline, 38% slot — growing role flexibility The 2022 data shows refinement in Grossman’s game — especially in pass protection — and a growing ability to operate out of the slot. His consistent ability to force missed tackles highlights his open-field agility and competitiveness. Key Strengths Soft, reliable hands and strong catch-point focus Crisp route runner with advanced spatial awareness Excellent yards-after-catch ability (former WR background) Proven production with All-American pedigree High football IQ; maintains spacing and adjusts routes effectively Versatile alignment profile (inline, slot, wide) Strong leadership traits and commitment to team Resilience and maturity through adversity Key Weaknesses Medical red flags (ACL, meniscus, suspension due to hormone treatment) Below-average inline strength as a run blocker Limited top-end speed (4.67 est.) Smaller frame for a traditional NFL TE role Minimal exposure to FBS or Power Five competition 2024 Season Highlights Returned late in the year following suspension Played in 5 games, recording 4 catches for 24 yards Named Preseason Second-Team All-American (Stats Perform, FCS Football Central) Praised by coaches as one of Montana’s most dynamic offensive weapons NFL Draft Projection Projected Round:  UDFA / Rookie Mini Camp Invite Ideal Role:  Flex tight end / H-back in a West Coast or Pro Spread system NFL (Style) Comparison: Grant Calcaterra Undersized TE with great ball skills, fluid movement, and WR-like traits. Like Calcaterra, Grossman wins with technique, effort, and spatial awareness. While not a direct comparison, Grossman’s yards-after-catch burst and open-field mobility draw some parallels to Brock Bowers — particularly how he creates separation post-catch using angles and body control rather than pure speed. Unless Grossman tests in the 4.5s at his current size, a transition to WR is unlikely. However, if he can add 10–15 pounds of functional weight to reach the 240–245 lb range, he has the tools to be a legit flex TE with enough blocking ability to contribute in 12 or 13 personnel groupings. Summary Cole Grossman is a highly productive, technically sound tight end who offers reliable hands, after-the-catch ability, and positional flexibility. While medical concerns and limited 2023–24 film may push him toward the UDFA market or a developmental league, his skill set and mentality make him an ideal candidate for a rookie camp invite or a developmental roster spot. Montana TE Cole Grossman battled injury and NCAA suspension—but his tape, hands, and toughness demand 2025 NFL Draft attention. - Brandon Lundberg Analyst Football Scout 365 If you watch his 2021 and 2022 tape, Grossman displays Day 3 upside. In the right system—and if he can add functional weight to his frame—he has the potential to develop into a starting-caliber NFL tight end. At the very least, he could emerge as a valuable TE2/TE3 with situational upside, particularly in spread or play-action-heavy offenses.

Have we finally settled the QB1 debate ahead of the 2025 NFL Draft? In the featured video below, I break down the stylistic differences, ceiling potential, player comparisons, and NFL landing spots for Cam Ward and Shedeur Sanders — the two quarterbacks projected to headline the 2025 NFL Draft. Cam Ward is widely expected to be selected No. 1 overall by the Tennessee Titans, while Shedeur Sanders remains a top-tier prospect whose draft range could span from pick No. 2 to pick No. 22. 🎥 Watch the Full Breakdown: Cam Ward vs. Shedeur Sanders Full Film Review: Cam Ward Analysis: Cam Ward’s Pro Day reaffirmed what we’ve seen on tape—he’s an elite off-platform thrower with outstanding arm strength and creativity under pressure. Stylistically, he blends the athletic traits of Justin Fields with arm talent reminiscent of Josh Allen—not identical, but similar in how he attacks defenses. His ability to read and manipulate coverages continues to improve, and his ceiling keeps rising. Right now, I believe he’s the top QB in this class. Ward is the projected No. 1 overall pick to the Titans, and after a deep dive into his situational tape, it’s clear he has top-10 NFL-level traits. 📺 Watch the Full Cam Ward Breakdown Full Film Review: Shedeur Sanders Analysis: Shedeur Sanders is an NFL-ready quarterback. His timing, pocket presence, and ability to deliver with rhythm stand out on film. While he doesn’t possess the same off-platform or athletic upside as Cam Ward, Sanders thrives in structured systems and could flourish with a creative offensive coordinator. I’ve compared his play style to Brock Purdy and Andy Dalton. While his ceiling may not be as high as Ward’s, his floor is arguably more stable. He’s currently projected to go 2nd overall to the Cleveland Browns in our Mock Draft 5.0. Previously, he was frequently mocked to the Giants at No. 3 overall—until they signed Jameis Winston and Russell Wilson in free agency. The Giants could still take a QB if the Browns pass on Sanders. If both the Browns and Giants pass, it opens the door for a potential slide—but I wouldn’t expect it to be far. The Raiders and Jets are both in play as landing spots, followed by the Saints, Colts, and Steelers as other possible first-round options. 📺 Watch the Full Shedeur Sanders Breakdown Cam Ward vs. Shedeur Sanders: Final Thoughts At this point, the gap between Ward and Sanders is widening slightly—but that doesn’t mean Shedeur can’t become a top-tier NFL starter. Ward may have the edge in tools and ceiling, but Sanders brings high-level decision-making, composure, and toughness. Stay tuned to FootballScout365.com for more NFL Draft content, including updated mock drafts, big board rankings, and full prospect evaluations.

Evaluating quarterbacks for the NFL Draft requires a balance of film study and advanced analytics to understand a player’s current skill set and projectable upside. At Football Scout 365, our model integrates these factors into a comprehensive quarterback grading system, blending technical proficiency, situational effectiveness, and playmaking ability to determine a quarterback’s long-term value at the NFL level. This ranking system does not exist in isolation. Instead, it provides valuable cross-class comparisons, evaluating both the 2024 and 2025 NFL Draft quarterback classes in the same framework. By applying the same methodology across multiple classes, we gain a realistic perspective on how this year's top QB prospects compare to last year’s first-round picks and risers. This gives NFL front offices, scouts, and fans a better understanding of how these prospects might translate to the league. Our model assigns 50% weight to film evaluation, ensuring a prospect's mechanics, decision-making, and processing ability hold the highest importance. The remaining 50% comes from data-driven efficiency metrics, focusing on a quarterback’s ability to create positive outcomes in both passing and rushing situations. The Key Components of Our Evaluation Model 1. Film Grade (50% of Total Score) – The Foundation of Projection Film study remains the most critical piece of quarterback evaluation. Every quarterback is assigned both a Final Grade (evaluating their current NFL readiness) and a Ceiling Grade (assessing their long-term potential). Final Grade:  Reflects a QB’s projected value entering the NFL based on film and performance metrics. Ceiling Grade:  Projects their maximum potential if they develop properly. Why It Matters: Traits like footwork, arm mechanics, pocket presence, field vision, and decision-making cannot be captured fully by raw statistics, making film study the cornerstone of projection. To ensure consistency and objectivity, we rank each quarterback’s Ceiling Grade against the entire dataset, assigning a percentile rank (0-99%) to reflect their film-based potential compared to peers. 2. Expected Points Added (EPA) – Measuring a QB’s Real Impact EPA (Expected Points Added) is the gold standard for evaluating a quarterback’s efficiency. Instead of just counting yards or touchdowns, EPA assigns a value to every play, determining whether a quarterback increased or decreased their team's chance of scoring. What Is EPA? Each play starts with an expected point value based on down, distance, and field position. A positive EPA means the play improved the team's chance of scoring. A negative EPA means the play hurt the team’s scoring chances. Why It Matters: Unlike traditional stats, EPA reflects a QB’s ability to consistently create positive outcomes, rather than just accumulating raw production. We assess quarterbacks based on their EPA percentile rankings in multiple key areas: ✅ 3rd Down 5+ Passing EPA (20%)  – How well a QB performs in the most challenging passing situations (3rd and 5 or longer). These are must-pass downs that separate good quarterbacks from great ones. ✅ 3rd Down Running EPA (10%)  – A QB’s ability to extend drives with their legs on critical downs. Mobile QBs who can create on 3rd downs add significant value to modern NFL offenses. ✅ All Passing Plays Total EPA (10%)  – A measure of overall passing efficiency, capturing how well a quarterback creates positive plays across all downs. ✅ All Downs Running EPA (10%)  – How effective a QB is as a scrambler outside of designed runs, highlighting their ability to create offense off-script. 3. Positive Play Rate, Boom%, and Bust% – The Hidden Indicators of QB Success In addition to EPA-based rankings, we assess quarterbacks using Positive Play Rate, Boom%, and Bust%—advanced metrics that quantify consistency and explosiveness in a quarterback’s performance. Positive Play Rate (% of Plays That Increase Expected Points) Measures how often a quarterback creates a net-positive outcome for their offense. A higher rate means greater consistency in moving the ball. Boom Rate (% of Plays That Create a Large EPA Gain) Captures how frequently a QB produces explosive plays that significantly impact scoring chances. High Boom% indicates big-play ability, but extreme volatility could signal risk-taking tendencies. Bust Rate (% of Plays That Severely Decrease Expected Points) Measures the frequency of game-changing mistakes like sacks, interceptions, or drive-killing negative plays. A lower Bust% is ideal, reflecting a QB’s ability to avoid costly errors. Why This Model Is a Great Way To ID Future NFL Potential By combining film grades with advanced efficiency metrics, this model paints the clearest picture of a quarterback’s true value and long-term NFL projection. 📌 Film remains KING  – The best NFL QBs demonstrate consistent mechanics, processing ability, and pocket presence that only film can reveal. 📌 Clutch Play Matters  – Quarterbacks who thrive in 3rd & 5+ passing situations translate well to the NFL, where success on high-leverage downs determines games. 📌 Athleticism Adds Value  – Modern QBs must be functional runners, either to extend plays or pick up first downs when needed. 📌 Explosiveness vs. Efficiency  – While big-play ability is important (Boom%), avoiding mistakes (Bust%) is just as critical. Comparing the 2024 & 2025 NFL Draft Classes The 2025 QB class enters this evaluation compared directly to the 2024 class, providing a clearer picture of how top prospects like J.J. McCarthy, Caleb Williams, and Jayden Daniels compare to their 2025 counterparts like Cam Ward, Shedeur Sanders, and Jaxson Dart. This historical comparison is critical because it helps NFL Evaluators: 🔹 Contextualize positional value in a given draft year. 🔹 Understand how a new class stacks up against recently drafted players. 🔹 Identify strengths and weaknesses relative to past first-round picks. What’s Next? With this comprehensive evaluation system in place, we now reveal our final quarterback rankings, starting with the highest-graded prospects based on this methodology. NFL Draft: Top Quarterback Rankings (Ranked by Total Score) 1. Jayden Daniels – LSU (Total Score: 95.87) ✅ Key Strength: Elite Dual-Threat Ability Jayden Daniels is the most dynamic quarterback in this evaluation, blending elite athleticism with efficient passing production. His film grade ranks 97th percentile, emphasizing his polished mechanics and ability to command an offense. His 99th percentile rank in both 3rd Down Running EPA and All Downs Running EPA showcases his ability to extend plays and create offense both in structure and off-script. Clutch Factor:  While his 90th percentile 3rd Down 5+ Passing EPA suggests strong situational passing, he isn’t as dominant in must-pass downs as some of his peers. Big-Play Potential:  His explosive rushing ability makes him a dangerous weapon in any system, particularly an RPO-heavy or spread offense. NFL Projection:  Daniels projects as an instant-impact playmaker with dual-threat capabilities, making him an ideal fit for a creative offensive scheme that maximizes his mobility. 2. Cam Ward – Miami (Total Score: 91.19) ✅ Key Strength: Clutch Passing Cam Ward thrives under pressure, boasting a 99th percentile rank in 3rd Down 5+ Passing EPA, meaning he excels in must-pass situations. His film grade (84th percentile) confirms his NFL-caliber arm talent and ability to deliver in high-pressure moments. Clutch Factor:  His elite 3rd Down 5+ Passing and top-tier Boom% show he can create explosive plays when it matters most. Pocket Poise:  Ward’s ability to make throws under duress gives him a significant edge over pure system-based passers. NFL Projection:  While he has playmaking ability, Ward will need continued development in decision-making to reach his full potential. His skill set aligns well with teams looking for a high-upside QB who can thrive in both structure and off-script. 3. J.J. McCarthy – Michigan (Total Score: 90.48) ✅ Key Strength: Clutch Passing Consistency J.J. McCarthy ranks 98th percentile in 3rd Down 5+ Passing EPA, proving he is one of the most reliable quarterbacks in high-pressure situations. His film grade (93.75th percentile) highlights his polished mechanics, quick release, and ability to operate efficiently in a pro-style offense. Clutch Factor:  McCarthy’s high-pressure passing efficiency makes him one of the most NFL-ready quarterbacks in this class. Pocket Control:  He processes defenses quickly, excels in rhythm-based passing, and makes high-level reads within structure. NFL Projection:  McCarthy is a safe projection for teams prioritizing high-floor passers with clutch efficiency. He fits best in a West Coast or play-action-heavy offense that values accuracy and decision-making. Shedeur Sanders – Colorado (Total Score: 89.85) ✅ Key Strength: Balanced Clutch Performance Shedeur Sanders displays elite poise and decision-making, excelling in both high-leverage passing and running situations. His film grade ranks 88th percentile, highlighting his polished mechanics, pocket awareness, and quick processing ability. Sanders thrives in critical moments, ranking in the 96th percentile in 3rd Down 5+ Passing EPA and 94th percentile in 3rd Down Running EPA, making him one of the most well-rounded quarterbacks in this evaluation. Clutch Factor: Sanders’ ability to operate in structure and create outside of it gives him one of the highest combined clutch passing and running scores in this study. Big-Play Potential: While not the most explosive athlete, his elite ball placement, anticipation, and command of the offense allow him to consistently move the chains and sustain drives. NFL Projection: Sanders profiles as a high-level pocket passer with enough mobility to evade pressure and extend plays, making him a strong fit in a West Coast or Spread offense that emphasizes quick reads and rhythm-based throws. 5. Drake Maye – North Carolina (Total Score: 89.28) ✅ Key Strength: Explosive Running in Clutch Moments Drake Maye is a prototype modern NFL quarterback, blending elite arm talent with high-end mobility. His film grade ranks 91st percentile, showcasing his ability to make NFL throws from multiple platforms, operate under pressure, and push the ball downfield. Where he truly separates himself is as a clutch runner, ranking in the 98th percentile in both 3rd Down Running EPA and All Downs Running EPA, making him one of the most dangerous scrambling quarterbacks in the class. Clutch Factor: His 83rd percentile 3rd Down 5+ Passing EPA is solid, but his 98th percentile rushing ability makes him lethal when plays break down. Big-Play Potential: Maye’s blend of arm strength and athleticism allows him to create explosive plays in and out of structure, but his aggressive decision-making can lead to inconsistency at times. NFL Projection: Maye projects as a high-upside franchise QB, best suited for a vertical passing offense that utilizes his ability to push the ball downfield while allowing him to create with his legs when needed. 6. Caleb Williams – USC (Total Score: 88.70) ✅ Key Strength: Elite Arm Talent Caleb Williams is the most physically gifted quarterback in this study, boasting elite arm talent, improvisational ability, and off-platform throwing skills. His film grade ranks 99th percentile, reflecting his unique ability to extend plays and throw with velocity and accuracy from any angle. Williams is at his best creating outside of structure, using his mobility to escape pressure and deliver accurate throws downfield. Clutch Factor: Williams’ playmaking ability allows him to generate big plays, but his 74th percentile 3rd Down 5+ Passing EPA suggests he’s not as dominant in structured clutch passing situations. Big-Play Potential: Williams thrives when improvising, but his reliance on off-script playmaking can sometimes lead to unnecessary risk-taking and inconsistency. NFL Projection: Williams projects as a high-upside franchise quarterback with elite tools, best suited for an offense that allows him to use his creativity while refining his decision-making in structured situations. 7. Jaxson Dart – Ole Miss (Total Score: 85.80) ✅ Key Strength:   Dynamic Creator Jaxson Dart is one of the most dangerous quarterbacks outside of structure, combining a live arm with elite mobility. His film grade ranks 75th percentile, showcasing his ability to extend plays and deliver accurate throws on the run. Dart thrives as a playmaker, ranking 99th percentile in both 3rd Down Running EPA and All Downs Running EPA, making him one of the most effective scrambling QBs in this class. Clutch Factor:  Dart’s 93rd percentile 3rd Down 5+ Passing EPA highlights his ability to make plays in must-pass situations. Big-Play Potential:  His athleticism and ability to create outside of structure allow him to generate explosive plays at a high rate. NFL Projection:  Dart projects as a high-upside dual-threat QB who fits best in an offense that incorporates RPOs and designed QB runs while refining his pocket presence. 8. Bo Nix – Oregon (Total Score: 71.03) ✅ Key Strength:   Overall Passing Efficiency Bo Nix stands out for his ability to efficiently distribute the football, excelling in quick-game concepts and structured offenses. His film grade ranks 56th percentile, indicating solid but unspectacular long-term potential. Nix's 99th percentile rank in All Passing Plays Total EPA reflects his ability to operate within structure and get the ball out quickly. Clutch Factor:  Despite his passing efficiency, his 62nd percentile 3rd Down 5+ Passing EPA suggests he isn’t elite in high-pressure situations. Big-Play Potential:  Nix’s ability to manage an offense and avoid costly mistakes makes him an ideal system quarterback. NFL Projection:  Nix projects as a high-floor, low-ceiling QB best suited for a timing-based system, such as a West Coast offense that values quick reads and accuracy. 9. Tyler Shough – Louisville (Total Score: 70.37) ✅ Key Strength:   Clutch Passing Reliability Tyler Shough is a battle-tested veteran with good size and a strong arm, allowing him to operate effectively in structured offenses. His film grade ranks 78th percentile, reflecting solid mechanics and experience in multiple offensive systems. Shough's 93rd percentile rank in 3rd Down 5+ Passing EPA indicates his ability to make critical throws in high-pressure situations. Clutch Factor:  His ability to consistently convert in must-pass downs is one of his biggest strengths. Big-Play Potential:  While not the most dynamic athlete, Shough's deep ball touch and command of the offense allow him to generate big plays when needed. NFL Projection:  Shough projects as a reliable developmental QB with the tools to be a quality backup or mid-level starter in a vertical passing offense. 10. Will Howard – Ohio State (Total Score: 69.55) ✅ Key Strength:   Consistent Passing Efficiency Will Howard is a well-rounded passer who operates efficiently within structure while displaying flashes of second-reaction playmaking. His film grade ranks 63rd percentile, reflecting his solid mechanics and ability to execute a pro-style offense. Howard's 99th percentile rank in All Passing Plays Total EPA highlights his ability to create positive plays consistently. Clutch Factor:  Despite his overall efficiency, his 97th percentile 3rd Down 5+ Passing EPA makes him one of the best situational passers in this evaluation. Big-Play Potential:  Howard thrives when given time to process, but his athletic limitations reduce his ability to create outside of structure. NFL Projection:  Howard projects as a high-floor quarterback with a chance to develop into a system-dependent starter in a spread or West Coast offense. 11. Michael Penix Jr. – Washington (Total Score: 65.83) ✅ Key Strength:   Passing Efficiency Michael Penix Jr. is one of the most polished passers in this class, with elite touch and ball placement on deep throws. His film grade ranks 81st percentile, indicating strong technical refinement and pocket awareness. His 94th percentile rank in All Passing Plays Total EPA reflects his ability to operate an explosive downfield passing attack. Clutch Factor:  While Penix is efficient overall, his 79th percentile 3rd Down 5+ Passing EPA suggests he isn’t elite in must-pass situations. Big-Play Potential:  His ability to push the ball downfield makes him one of the most dangerous vertical passers in this class. NFL Projection:  Penix projects as a high-upside pocket passer who can thrive in a pass-heavy offense built around vertical concepts. 12. Kyle McCord – Syracuse (Total Score: 64.99) ✅ Key Strength:   Overall Passing Efficiency Kyle McCord is a rhythm-based passer who operates well in structure, using timing and anticipation to deliver the football accurately. His film grade ranks 59th percentile, showing solid but unspectacular potential as a pocket passer. McCord's 97th percentile rank in All Passing Plays Total EPA highlights his ability to move the ball efficiently within a clean pocket. Clutch Factor:  His 90th percentile 3rd Down 5+ Passing EPA suggests he can perform well in key moments but lacks the ability to create outside of structure. Big-Play Potential:  McCord is a capable deep-ball thrower, but his lack of mobility limits his ability to generate off-script plays. NFL Projection:  McCord projects as a system-dependent quarterback best suited for a timing-based offense with strong protection. 13. Quinn Ewers – Texas (Total Score: 63.92) ✅ Key Strength:   Film Potential Quinn Ewers is a naturally talented passer with the arm strength to make any throw on the field, but inconsistencies in mechanics and decision-making have limited his production. His film grade ranks 66th percentile, reflecting his raw ability but uneven execution. While his 77th percentile 3rd Down 5+ Passing EPA suggests moderate success in clutch passing situations, his 47th percentile 3rd Down Running EPA limits his ability to extend plays when pressured. Clutch Factor:  Ewers has shown flashes in big moments, but his 5th percentile rank in Clutch EPA (3rd Down 5+ Passing) indicates major struggles in high-leverage downs. Big-Play Potential:  His ability to push the ball downfield is an asset, but inconsistent accuracy and footwork create volatility. NFL Projection:  Ewers projects as a high-upside developmental passer who needs mechanical refinement and a strong offensive structure to succeed. 14. Dillon Gabriel – Oregon (Total Score: 43.50) ✅ Key Strength:   Clutch Passing Dillon Gabriel is an experienced and efficient passer who excels in high-pressure situations. His film grade ranks 0th percentile in this study, reflecting concerns about his translatability to the NFL due to arm strength limitations and a system-dependent playstyle. However, his 99th percentile 3rd Down 5+ Passing EPA makes him one of the most effective clutch passers in this evaluation. Clutch Factor:  Gabriel thrives in must-pass situations, ranking at the top in 3rd Down 5+ Passing EPA, showing a strong command of situational football. Big-Play Potential:  While he has been productive, Gabriel's lack of elite arm talent and mobility limits his ability to create explosive plays off-script. NFL Projection:  Gabriel projects as a high-floor backup quarterback with potential to be a bridge starter in a quick-game-oriented offense. 15. Jalen Milroe – Alabama (Total Score: 33.63) ✅ Key Strength:   Clutch Running Ability Jalen Milroe is the most physically gifted athlete among the quarterbacks in this evaluation, boasting elite speed and rushing ability. His film grade ranks 6th percentile, reflecting significant concerns about his consistency as a passer. His 73rd percentile 3rd Down Running EPA highlights his ability to create with his legs, but his 54th percentile 3rd Down 5+ Passing EPA raises concerns about his ability to win as a passer in high-leverage downs. Clutch Factor:  While his running ability adds a dynamic element, his inconsistent passing production on 3rd and long remains a major red flag. Big-Play Potential:  Milroe is a true dual-threat who can turn broken plays into explosive gains, but his passing limitations create boom-or-bust results. NFL Projection:  Milroe projects as a long-term developmental quarterback who may transition into a gadget role or need multiple years to refine his passing mechanics.

NFL Free Agency 2025: Breaking Down Team Spending Trends and Priorities NFL teams have made their priorities clear in 2025 Free Agency, spending heavily in the trenches to solidify both offensive and defensive lines. The emphasis on EDGE rushers, interior defensive linemen (DL), offensive tackles (T), and interior offensive linemen (IOL) underscores the league-wide recognition that controlling the line of scrimmage remains essential for success. At the core of Super Bowl-winning teams, a dominant offensive and defensive line combination provides flexibility to dictate the game on both sides of the ball. Howie Roseman and the Philadelphia Eagles have mastered this strategy in recent years, proving that even if a team lacks an elite quarterback, a dominant line can elevate the entire roster. With over $2.1 billion spent so far on the trenches, let’s break down how teams invested their cap space and which positions garnered the most attention. Total Spending by Position in Free Agency The table below summarizes total spending, number of players signed, and average annual value (AAV) per position. Position Players Signed Total Spending ($M) Avg. Yrs AAV ($M) EDGE 25 787.7 2.0 12.5 DL 29 722.2 2.1 9.7 CB 21 634.8 2.4 10.8 QB 13 557.8 2.0 13.3 WR 24 544.0 1.9 9.5 LB 26 449.1 2.1 7.0 IOL 17 411.5 2.2 9.4 S 17 341.0 2.1 8.1 T 11 333.1 2.3 11.4 TE 9 137.3 2.1 6.8 RB 8 87.3 1.5 6.5 NFL’s Heavy Investment in the Trenches NFL teams allocated a combined $2.1 billion toward offensive and defensive linemen (EDGE, DL, IOL, T), reinforcing the belief that controlling the line of scrimmage remains crucial to building a championship-caliber roster. Key Takeaways: EDGE rushers led the spending spree with $787.7M in contracts, averaging $12.5M AAV. Defensive linemen (IDL) followed closely with $722.2M spent, a reflection of how valuable interior disruptors have become in modern defenses. Offensive linemen were not far behind, with offensive tackles (T) earning $333.1M and interior linemen (IOL) receiving $411.5M. Cornerbacks ranked third in total spending, highlighting the continued arms race in pass defense. Top 5 Teams by Spending on EDGE, DL, IOL, and OT Here’s a look at the biggest spenders in the trenches during Free Agency. Top 5 Teams in IDL Spending Team DL (%) Dallas Cowboys 57.1% Houston Texans 34.1% Chicago Bears 30.9% New England Patriots 29.7% Minnesota Vikings 29.3% Top 5 Teams in EDGE Spending Team EDGE (%) Cleveland Browns 71.0% Las Vegas Raiders 61.1% New Orleans Saints 45.0% Arizona Cardinals 39.9% Chicago Bears 34.0% Top 5 Teams in IOL Spending Team IOL (%) Green Bay Packers 53.0% Jacksonville Jaguars 33.1% Kansas City Chiefs 30.4% Chicago Bears 29.8% Minnesota Vikings 22.3% Top 5 Teams in Offensive Tackle Spending Team T (%) Baltimore Ravens 73.4% Atlanta Falcons 44.6% Tennessee Titans 34.7% Los Angeles Rams 26.0% Kansas City Chiefs 19.5% Biggest Free Agent Signings in the Trenches NFL teams prioritized premium talent at key positions in the trenches. Here are the largest signings by position group: Top Defensive Line (DL) Contracts in Free Agency NFL teams prioritized elite interior defensive linemen in 2025 free agency, investing heavily in players who can stop the run and collapse the pocket in today's evolving defensive schemes. Here are the top 15 DL signings based on total contract value and AAV: Milton Williams (Patriots)  – 4 years, $104M  ($26M AAV) Osa Odighizuwa (Cowboys)  – 4 years, $80M  ($20M AAV) Jonathan Allen (Vikings)  – 3 years, $60M  ($20M AAV) Tershawn Wharton (Panthers)  – 3 years, $54M  ($18M AAV) Javon Kinlaw (Commanders)  – 3 years, $45M  ($15M AAV) Javon Hargrave (Vikings)  – 2 years, $30M  ($15M AAV) Grady Jarrett (Bears)  – 3 years, $43.5M  ($14.5M AAV) Dalvin Tomlinson (Cardinals)  – 2 years, $29M  ($14.5M AAV) D.J. Jones (Broncos)  – 3 years, $39M  ($13M AAV) B.J. Hill (Bengals)  – 3 years, $33M  ($11M AAV) Poona Ford (Rams)  – 3 years, $30M  ($10M AAV) Maliek Collins (Browns)  – 2 years, $20M  ($10M AAV) Dre’Mont Jones (Titans)  – 1 year, $10M  ($10M AAV) T.J. Slaton (Bengals)  – 2 years, $15M  ($7.5M AAV) Sebastian Joseph-Day (Titans)  – 1 year, $7.5M  ($7.5M AAV) Top Edge Rusher (EDGE) Contracts in Free Agency NFL teams heavily prioritized pass rushers in 2025 free agency, recognizing the premium value of disrupting opposing quarterbacks. Here are the top 15 EDGE signings based on total contract value and AAV: Myles Garrett (Browns)  – 4 years, $160M  ($40M AAV) Maxx Crosby (Raiders)  – 3 years, $106.5M  ($35.5M AAV) Gregory Rousseau (Bills)  – 4 years, $80M  ($20M AAV) Josh Sweat (Cardinals)  – 4 years, $76.4M  ($19.1M AAV) Khalil Mack (Chargers)  – 1 year, $18M  ($18M AAV) Chase Young (Saints)  – 3 years, $51M  ($17M AAV) Dayo Odeyingbo (Bears)  – 3 years, $48M  ($16M AAV) Harold Landry III (Patriots)  – 3 years, $43.5M  ($14.5M AAV) Haason Reddick (Buccaneers)  – 1 year, $14M  ($14M AAV) Joey Bosa (Bills)  – 1 year, $12.6M  ($12.6M AAV) Malcolm Koonce (Raiders)  – 1 year, $12M  ($12M AAV) DeMarcus Lawrence (Seahawks)  – 3 years, $32.49M  ($10.83M AAV) Patrick Jones II (Panthers)  – 2 years, $20M  ($10M AAV) Leonard Floyd (Falcons)  – 1 year, $10M  ($10M AAV) Michael Hoecht (Bills)  – 3 years, $24M  ($8M AAV) Top Interior Offensive Line (IOL) Contracts in Free Agency With defenses increasingly prioritizing interior pass rush, NFL teams made significant investments in their interior offensive lines to counteract this trend. Here are the top 15 IOL signings based on total contract value and AAV: Trey Smith (Chiefs)  – Franchise Tag, 1 year, $23.4M  ($23.4M AAV) Aaron Banks (Packers)  – 4 years, $77M  ($19.25M AAV) Will Fries (Vikings)  – 5 years, $88M  ($17.6M AAV) Drew Dalman (Bears)  – 3 years, $42M  ($14M AAV) Patrick Mekari (Jaguars)  – 3 years, $37.5M  ($12.5M AAV) Ryan Kelly (Vikings)  – 2 years, $18M  ($9M AAV) Kevin Zeitler (Titans)  – 1 year, $9M  ($9M AAV) James Daniels (Dolphins)  – 3 years, $24M  ($8M AAV) Ben Bredeson (Buccaneers)  – 3 years, $22M  ($7.33M AAV) Robert Hainsey (Jaguars)  – 3 years, $21M  ($7M AAV) Bradley Bozeman (Chargers)  – 2 years, $12M  ($6M AAV) Evan Brown (Cardinals)  – 2 years, $11.5M  ($5.75M AAV) Alex Cappa (Raiders)  – 2 years, $11M  ($5.5M AAV) Robert Jones (Cowboys)  – 1 year, $4.5M  ($4.5M AAV) Laken Tomlinson (Texans)  – 1 year, $4.25M  ($4.25M AAV) Top Offensive Tackle (OT) Contracts in Free Agency NFL teams continued their investment in the trenches, with offensive tackles securing significant deals to protect quarterbacks and solidify the edge in both pass protection and run blocking. Here are the top 10 OT signings based on total contract value and AAV: Jake Matthews (Falcons)  – Re-sign (Extended), 2 years, $45M  ($22.5M AAV) Dan Moore Jr. (Titans)  – Free Agent, 4 years, $82M  ($20.5M AAV) Ronnie Stanley (Ravens)  – Re-sign, 3 years, $60M  ($20M AAV) Alaric Jackson (Rams)  – Re-sign, 3 years, $57M  ($19M AAV) Jaylon Moore (Chiefs)  – Free Agent, 2 years, $30M  ($15M AAV) Morgan Moses (Patriots)  – Free Agent, 3 years, $24M  ($8M AAV) James Hudson III (Giants)  – Free Agent, 2 years, $12M  ($6M AAV) Cornelius Lucas (Browns)  – Free Agent, 2 years, $10M  ($5M AAV) Chuma Edoga (Jaguars)  – Free Agent, 2 years, $7M  ($3.5M AAV) Josh Jones (Seahawks)  – Free Agent, 1 year, $4.75M  ($4.75M AAV)

With the 2025 NFL Scouting Combine complete and free agency starting to wind down, the focus now shifts to the pro day circuit, an essential step in the NFL Draft evaluation process. Pro days provide a controlled environment for prospects to showcase their athleticism, position-specific drills, and on-field workouts in front of scouts, coaches, and executives. Unlike the Combine, pro days allow players to perform in familiar surroundings with their own trainers and teammates, often leading to improved performances in drills such as the 40-yard dash, three-cone drill, and position-specific workouts. Additionally, pro days serve as a critical opportunity for non-Combine invitees to make a lasting impression on NFL teams. For some players, this will be their only chance to work out in front of scouts before draft day. Teams also use these visits to gather medical updates, conduct interviews, and refine their scouting reports. Below is a list of confirmed college pro days ahead of the 2025 NFL Draft, which takes place from April 24-26 in Green Bay, Wisconsin. 2025 NFL Draft: Pro Day Schedule Big 12 Pro Day The Big 12 is hosting a joint pro day at The Star in Frisco, Texas, from March 18-21, featuring prospects from multiple schools: Arizona Arizona State Baylor BYU UCF Cincinnati Colorado Houston Iowa State Kansas Kansas State Oklahoma State TCU Texas Tech Utah West Virginia March 3 Ball State Miami (Ohio) March 4 Indiana March 5 Purdue March 7 Washington State Wisconsin March 10 Washington Western Michigan March 11 Kentucky Oklahoma Tennessee March 12 Georgia Rutgers USC March 13 Clemson Colorado State Illinois March 14 Delaware Georgia Tech March 17 Arkansas Northern Illinois Oregon State Syracuse UCLA March 18 Central Arkansas Memphis Oregon South Carolina Virginia March 19 Alabama Alabama A&M Minnesota San Jose State Stanford March 20 California William & Mary March 21 Florida State Michigan Missouri Utah State March 24 Auburn Boston College Bowling Green East Carolina Iowa Marshall Miami North Carolina Northern Iowa SMU Toledo UNLV UTSA March 25 Louisville Nebraska N.C. State Texas Tulane UConn March 26 Boise State LSU Navy Ohio State Pittsburgh Virginia Tech Western Kentucky March 27 Florida North Dakota State Notre Dame Texas A&M Villanova March 28 Jacksonville State Maryland Mississippi Penn State March 31 Sacramento State April 1 Nevada

The 2025 NFL Scouting Combine is in the books, and several prospects took full advantage of the opportunity to elevate their draft stock in Indianapolis. While some top players, including Mason Graham (Michigan), Abdul Carter (Penn State), Kenneth Grant (Michigan), and Jalon Walker (Georgia), opted out of testing, others made the most of their time on the field. From explosive pass rushers to lightning-fast defensive backs and elite offensive linemen, these prospects boosted their stock in a big way. On the other hand, a handful of players raised concerns with underwhelming performances. 📈 10 Players Who Boosted Their Draft Stock the Most At The NFL Combine Here’s a look at the 10 biggest risers and notable fallers from the 2025 NFL Combine. 1. Shemar Stewart (EDGE, Texas A&M) 📊 40-Yard Dash:  4.59 sec | 10-Yard Split:  1.58 sec📊 Vertical:  40” | Broad Jump:  10’11”📌 Size:  6’5”, 267 lbs Stewart was already a highly regarded edge rusher, but his testing numbers were historic. His 40-inch vertical and 10’11” broad jump put him among the best testers in Combine history at his position. His 1.58-second 10-yard split was the 2nd-fastest for a 265+ lb EDGE since 2010 , just behind Nick Bosa. Teams looking for an explosive pass rusher will strongly consider him in the top 10. 2. James Pearce Jr. (EDGE, Tennessee) 📊 40-Yard Dash:  4.47 sec | 10-Yard Split:  1.56 sec📊 Vertical:  31” | Broad Jump:  10’3”📌 Size:  6’5”, 245 lbs Pearce’s elite get-off was on full display. His 4.47-second 40 at 6’5”, 245 lbs solidified his status as a premier edge rusher. While his vertical jump (31”) was lower than expected, his burst off the line was evident in drills. Pearce may have moved himself back into the top 20 conversation. 3. Nick Emmanwori (S, South Carolina) 📊 40-Yard Dash:  4.38 sec | 10-Yard Split:  1.49 sec📊 Vertical:  43” | Broad Jump:  11’6”📌 Size:  6’3”, 220 lbs One of the most athletic safeties in the draft, Emmanwori’s 4.38 speed at 220 pounds was eye-opening. His 43-inch vertical jump was the best among safeties, and his 11’6” broad jump was one of the best ever at his position. His Combine locked him in as a first-rounder. 4. Will Campbell (OT, LSU) 📊 40-Yard Dash:  4.98 sec | 10-Yard Split:  1.76 sec📊 Vertical:  32” | Broad Jump:  9’5”📌 Size:  6’6”, 319 lbs Campbell’s elite movement at 319 pounds made him one of only four O-linemen since 2003 to run a sub-5.0 40 while jumping over 30 inches in the vertical. Already a top-20 prospect, his Combine locked him in as a first-round selection. 5. Matthew Golden (WR, Texas) 📊 40-Yard Dash:  4.30 sec | 10-Yard Split:  1.49 sec📊 Vertical:  39” | Broad Jump:  10’8”📌 Size:  5’11”, 200 lbs Golden put on a track meet, recording the fastest top speed (23.57 mph) of any WR at the Combine. His 4.30-second 40 and explosive leaping numbers solidified his status as a late first or early second-round prospect. 6. Bhayshul Tuten (RB, Virginia Tech) 📊 40-Yard Dash:  4.32 sec | 10-Yard Split:  1.49 sec📊 Top Speed:  22.86 mph | Broad Jump:  10’10”📌 Size:  5’9”, 203 lbs Tuten was a sleeper coming into Indy, but he left as the fastest RB in the class. His 4.32-second 40 and 10’10” broad jump showcased his explosiveness, vaulting him into the mid-Day 2 conversation. 7. Aireontae Ersery (OT, Minnesota) 📊 40-Yard Dash:  5.01 sec | 10-Yard Split:  1.75 sec📊 Vertical:  29.5” | Broad Jump:  9’3”📌 Size:  6’6”, 331 lbs Ersery’s 5.01-second 40-yard dash made him the fastest 330+ lb OT since 2003. His short-area quickness and strong pass-protection drills pushed him into Round 1 discussions. 8. Maxwell Hairston (CB, Kentucky) 📊 40-Yard Dash:  4.28 sec | 10-Yard Split:  1.50 sec📊 Vertical:  39.5” | Broad Jump:  10’9”📌 Size:  5’11”, 183 lbs Hairston was already known for his elite ball production, but his 4.28-second 40 and elite explosiveness could push him into the late first round. 9. Omarion Hampton (RB, North Carolina) 📊 40-Yard Dash:  4.46 sec | Vertical:  38”📊 Broad Jump:  10’10” | Short Shuttle:  4.40 sec📌 Size:  6’0”, 221 lbs Hampton’s 4.46-second 40 at 221 lbs and 38-inch vertical confirmed his blend of power and explosiveness. He’s a lock for early Day 2 and could push for late Round 1 consideration. 10. Jared Wilson (C, Georgia) 📊 40-Yard Dash:  4.84 sec | 10-Yard Split:  1.72 sec📊 Vertical:  32” | Broad Jump:  9’4”📌 Size:  6’3”, 310 lbs Wilson became the fastest interior lineman at this year's Combine, reaching a top speed of 21.04 mph. His testing solidified him as a high-end second-round pick.

Day 4 of the 2025 NFL Scouting Combine belonged to the offensive linemen, and this year’s group put on an impressive display of speed, agility, and power. With the final day of on-field workouts wrapping up in Indianapolis, several linemen cemented themselves as first-round prospects, while others saw their stock rise dramatically. Among the standouts, LSU’s Will Campbell, Missouri’s Armand Membou, Minnesota’s Aireontae Ersery, Georgia’s Jared Wilson, and several others flashed high-level athleticism, showcasing rare movement skills at their size. 2025 NFL Combine Day 4: Offensive Linemen Showcase Elite Athleticism Below, we break down the top performers, their results, and how today’s testing impacted their NFL Draft stock. Aireontae Ersery (OT, Minnesota) 40-Yard Dash:  5.01 seconds 10-Yard Split:  1.75 seconds Vertical Jump:  29.5” Broad Jump:  9’3” Size:  6’6”, 331 lbs 📌 Scouting Report vs. Combine Performance:  Ersery’s 5.01-second 40-yard dash made history, as he became the fastest offensive lineman over 6’6” and 330 lbs since 2003. His short-area quickness, powerful hands, and ability to move laterally were on full display in drills. 📈  Draft Stock Impact:  Ersery was viewed as an early to mid-second-round prospect, but his athletic testing could push him up into the first round.  His experience as a left tackle and ability to thrive in zone-heavy blocking schemes make him an intriguing developmental starter at tackle or guard. Will Campbell (OT, LSU) 40-Yard Dash:  4.98 seconds 10-Yard Split:  1.76 seconds Vertical Jump:  32” Broad Jump:  9’5” Size:  6’6”, 319 lbs 📌 Scouting Report vs. Combine Performance:  Campbell showed why he’s a first-round prospect, testing in elite company. His 4.98-second 40-yard dash at 319 pounds makes him one of only four offensive linemen since 2003 to run a sub-5.0 40 while jumping over 30 inches in the vertical. His movement skills on drills like the Deep Short Pull Drill (17.38 mph) and Pass Pro Mirror Drill (13.45 mph) further prove his high-end athleticism for the tackle position. 📈 Draft Stock Impact:  Campbell was already viewed as a top-20 pick, and today’s performance solidified his first-round projection. His positional flexibility at tackle or guard could make him a target for teams needing offensive line help early in the draft. Armand Membou (OT, Missouri) 40-Yard Dash:  4.91 seconds 10-Yard Split:  1.74 seconds Vertical Jump:  34” Broad Jump:  9’7” Size:  6’4”, 332 lbs 📌 Scouting Report vs. Combine Performance:  Membou's 4.91-second 40-yard dash at 332 pounds was one of the best performances of the day, reaching a top speed of 20.28 mph, the fastest by any offensive lineman today. His 34-inch vertical jump was the best among all linemen, showing elite explosiveness and lower-body power. 📈 Draft Stock Impact:  Membou had been projected as a late first-rounder or early Day 2 pick, but his elite testing numbers could push him firmly into the middle of the first round. His power, movement skills and versatility make him an intriguing option for teams looking for a high-upside tackle or guard. Jared Wilson (C, Georgia) 40-Yard Dash:  4.84 seconds 10-Yard Split:  1.72 seconds Vertical Jump:  32” Broad Jump:  9’4” Size:  6’3”, 310 lbs 📌 Scouting Report vs. Combine Performance:  Wilson ran a 4.84-second 40-yard dash, reaching a top speed of 21.04 mph, making him the fastest interior offensive lineman in this year's Combine and the only interior OL to surpass 21 mph. His 32-inch vertical and 9’4” broad jump further reinforce his explosiveness, proving he can excel at the center position at the next level. 📈 Draft Stock Impact:  Wilson entered the Combine as a Day 2 prospect, but his testing numbers solidified his status as a high-end second-round pick. His athleticism and ability to work in space make him a perfect fit for teams running outside-zone blocking schemes.

Day 3 of the 2025 NFL Scouting Combine is in the books, and with several top prospects participating in testing, this group of running backs and wide receivers put on a show in Indianapolis. TreVeyon Henderson, Omarion Hampton, and Bhayshul Tuten headlined the running back group, while Matthew Golden, Luther Burden III, and Jayden Higgins made a statement at wide receiver. This year's class of running backs and wide receivers brought elite speed, explosion, and athleticism, showcasing why this position group is expected to have a strong presence in the early rounds of the 2025 NFL Draft. Below, we break down the top performers, how their Combine results align with their scouting profiles, and how their draft stock has shifted based on today’s testing. Day Three 2025 NFL Combine: Quarterbacks, Running Backs & Wide Receivers TreVeyon Henderson (RB, Ohio State) 40-Yard Dash:  4.43 seconds 10-Yard Split:  1.52 seconds Top Speed:  23.38 mph (2nd-fastest among RBs) Vertical Jump:  38.5” Broad Jump:  10’8” Size:  5’10”, 202 lbs 📌 Scouting Report vs. Combine Performance:  Henderson entered the Combine already viewed as one of the most explosive running backs in the class, and he delivered on that reputation with a 4.43-second 40-yard dash and an elite 23.38 mph top speed . His 38.5-inch vertical and 10’8” broad jump confirmed his lower-body explosion, showcasing why he’s a dangerous home-run threat. 📈 Draft Stock Impact:  Henderson was already a projected top-3 RB prospect, and his performance only cemented his standing as an early Day 2 pick, with a chance to push into the late first round if a team prioritizes speed and explosiveness. Bhayshul Tuten (RB, Virginia Tech) 40-Yard Dash:  4.32 seconds (Fastest among RBs) 10-Yard Split:  1.49 seconds Top Speed:  22.86 mph Broad Jump:  10’10” Size:  5’9”, 203 lbs 📌 Scouting Report vs. Combine Performance:  Tuten was a relative sleeper heading into the Combine, but his 4.32-second 40-yard dash was the fastest among all RBs, and his 10’10” broad jump showcased his explosiveness. His top-end speed (22.86 mph) ranks among the fastest by any RB over the past two years, making him an intriguing big-play threat at the next level. 📈 Draft Stock Impact:  Tuten vaulted himself into the mid-Day 2 discussion with this performance. He profiles as a high-upside, change-of-pace weapon for teams looking to add speed to their backfield. Omarion Hampton (RB, North Carolina) 40-Yard Dash:  4.46 seconds 10-Yard Split:  1.54 seconds Vertical Jump:  38” Broad Jump:  10’10” Short Shuttle:  4.40 seconds Size:  6’0”, 221 lbs 📌 Scouting Report vs. Combine Performance:  Hampton is a powerful, north-south runner, and his testing numbers reflected that. His 38-inch vertical and 10’10” broad jump validated his explosiveness, while his 4.46-second 40-yard dash at 221 lbs confirmed that he has enough long speed to complement his physical running style. 📈 Draft Stock Impact:  Hampton was already seen as a late day one or early Day 2 pick, and this performance solidified that status. His ability to be a high-volume, between-the-tackles runner with explosion makes him an attractive fit for power-running teams. Matthew Golden (WR, Texas) 40-Yard Dash:  4.30 seconds 10-Yard Split:  1.49 seconds Vertical Jump:  39” Broad Jump:  10’8” Top Speed:  23.57 mph (Fastest WR at the Combine) Size:  5’11”, 200 lbs 📌 Scouting Report vs. Combine Performance:  Golden confirmed his elite athleticism, running a blazing 4.30-second 40-yard dash while recording the fastest top speed (23.57 mph) of any WR at the Combine. His explosiveness (39” vertical, 10’8” broad jump) backed up his tape, where he’s showcased elite acceleration and playmaking ability. 📈 Draft Stock Impact:  Golden boosted his stock into the late day one or early Day 2 range and could climb even higher if teams value his combination of speed and route-running ability. Luther Burden III (WR, Missouri) 40-Yard Dash:  4.42 seconds 10-Yard Split:  1.54 seconds Top Speed:  22.80 mph Size:  6’0”, 208 lbs 📌  Scouting Report vs. Combine Performance:  Burden is one of the most polished WRs in this class; posting a 4.42-second 40-yard dash is what he needed. His 22.80 mph top speed and strong tape as a route-runner and a running back after the catch make him a strong late 1st, early day two option. 📈 Draft Stock Impact:  Burden remains a borderline first-round prospect, and while his speed won’t blow teams away, his all-around game, polish, and versatility make him a safe bet in the top 50 picks. Jayden Higgins (WR, Iowa State) 40-Yard Dash:  4.47 seconds 10-Yard Split:  1.53 seconds Vertical Jump:  39” Broad Jump:  10’8” Size:  6’4”, 214 lbs 📌 Scouting Report vs. Combine Performance:  Higgins put on a show for a bigger receiver, jumping 39 inches in the vertical and hitting 10’8” in the broad jump—elite numbers for a WR of his size. His 4.47-second 40-yard dash isn’t blazing, but his combination of length, ball skills, and explosion make him a mismatch weapon. 📈  Draft Stock Impact:  Higgins solidified his status as a Day 2 pick; how high on Day 2 might have been determined at the NFL Combine.   Elic Ayomanor (WR, Stanford) 40-Yard Dash:  4.40 seconds Vertical Jump:  38.5” Broad Jump:  10’9” Size:  6’2”, 215 lbs 📌 Scouting Report vs. Combine Performance:  Ayomanor is a big, strong receiver with excellent body control, and he tested extremely well across the board. His 4.40 speed at 6’2”, 215 lbs, along with a 38.5-inch vertical and 10’9” broad jump, showcased his ability to play above the rim while still maintaining big-play speed. 📈 Draft Stock Impact:  Ayomanor helped himself with a strong Combine performance and could land inside the top 40 picks. I would not be surprised, based on these numbers, if he climbs into early day 2, late day one conversations. Jaylin Noel (WR, Iowa State) 40-Yard Dash:  4.39 seconds 10-Yard Split:  1.51 seconds Vertical Jump:  41.5” (T-1st among WRs) Broad Jump:  11’2” (1st among WRs) Size:  5’10”, 194 lbs 📌 Scouting Report vs. Combine Performance:  Noel came into the Combine as an explosive but under-the-radar prospect, and he put on a show in Indianapolis. His 4.39-second 40-yard dash, paired with an elite 41.5-inch vertical and 11’2” broad jump, highlighted his elite short-area burst and explosive lower-body power. These numbers reinforce his ability to create separation and thrive after the catch, two traits that already stood out on film. 📈 Draft Stock Impact:  Noel’s athleticism will force teams to take a second look, especially with the new NFL kickoff return rules that increase the value of dynamic returners. Already considered a mid-round prospect, Noel’s performance could push him into the Day 2 conversation, especially for teams looking for a slot weapon with added special teams value. Tyler Shough (QB, Louisville) 40-Yard Dash:  4.63 seconds ( 2nd fastest QB time ) 10-Yard Split:  1.61 seconds Vertical Jump:  32” Broad Jump:  9’9” Size:  6’5”, 219 lbs 📌 Scouting Report vs. Combine Performance:  Shough’s 4.63-second 40-yard dash was one of the fastest among quarterbacks, proving he has underrated mobility despite being viewed as a traditional pocket passer. His 32” vertical and 9’9” broad jump showcased solid lower-body explosiveness. While he remains more of a pocket-based QB rather than an elite scrambler, he flashes the ability to make accurate throws on the move from different arm slots. He will be a 25-year-old rookie, but NFL scouts have told me that won’t be an issue. 📈 Draft Stock Impact:  Shough has been projected anywhere from late Day 2 to early Day 3, but his performance in Indianapolis may have solidified him as a second-round pick. We currently have him graded as the QB3.

Day 2 of the 2025 NFL Scouting Combine featured defensive backs and tight ends taking the field in Indianapolis. With several of the top defensive backs participating, today’s session provided a clearer picture of the speed, explosiveness, and range this draft class brings. The cornerback group recorded a historic 4.44-second average in the 40-yard dash, making them the fastest CB group at the Combine since 2003, according to NFL IQ . Meanwhile, safeties like Nick Emmanwori and Malaki Starks showcased elite athleticism in position drills and testing. Below, I break down the standout NFL Combine performances, analyzing their measurements, how they align with scouting reports, and the impact of today’s testing on their draft stock. Day Two 2025 NFL Combine: Who Stood Out? Nick Emmanwori (S, South Carolina) 40-Yard Dash:  4.38 seconds 10-Yard Split:  1.49 seconds Vertical Jump:  43” (Best among SAF) Broad Jump:  11’6” (Tied for 2nd longest by a 220+ lb SAF since 2003) Size:  6’3”, 220 lbs 📌 Scouting Report vs. Combine Performance: Emmanwori entered the Combine as a top 3 safety on our NFL Draft Big Board, and his workout backed up that ranking. His elite blend of size, speed, and explosiveness was on full display. His 4.38-second 40-yard dash at 220 pounds is rare, and his 43-inch vertical and 11’6” broad jump cement his status as one of the best athletes in this class. His top speed of 23.53 mph  in the 40-yard dash was tied for the third-fastest among safeties over the last three years. 📈 Draft Stock Impact:  Already viewed as a top-30 prospect, Emmanwori’s Combine performance further solidifies his standing as a top 3 safety in this class. His combination of range, ball skills, and physicality makes him an ideal fit for teams needing a versatile defensive back capable of covering tight ends, playing deep, or working in the box. Maxwell Hairston (CB, Kentucky) 40-Yard Dash:  4.28 seconds (Tied for 5th-fastest CB time since 2003) 10-Yard Split:  1.50 seconds Vertical Jump:  39.5” Broad Jump:  10’9” Size:  5’11”, 183 lbs 📌 Scouting Report vs. Combine Performance: Hairston was already known for his elite ball production, but his Combine performance proved that he has the athleticism to match. His 4.28-second 40-yard dash at 183 pounds shows top-end speed, while his 39.5-inch vertical and 10’9” broad jump confirm his explosiveness. His top speed of 24.25 mph on his second 40-yard dash attempt was the fastest of any cornerback at this year’s Combine and one of the fastest in recent Combine history. 📈 Draft Stock Impact:  Hairston was a fringe Round 2 prospect entering the Combine, but his testing numbers might push him into the late first or early second-round conversation. Teams looking for a ball-hawking corner with elite recovery speed will take a close look at him. Darien Porter (CB, Iowa State) 40-Yard Dash:  4.30 seconds (Tied for 2nd fastest among CBs) 10-Yard Split:  1.49 seconds Vertical Jump:  36.5” Broad Jump:  10’11” Size:  6’3”, 195 lbs 📌 Scouting Report vs. Combine Performance: Porter’s length (6’3”, 33” arms) and elite speed made him an intriguing prospect entering the Combine, and he confirmed those strengths with outstanding testing numbers. His 4.30-second 40-yard dash was the 2nd fastest among CBs, and his broad jump of 10’11” displayed his lower-body explosion. He reached a top speed of 14.94 mph within the first 5 yards, one of the fastest acceleration marks for any CB over the last three years. 📈  Draft Stock Impact:  Porter’s stock was hovering around the early to mid-Day 2 range before the Combine; he solidified his stock with his performance. Robert Longerbeam (CB, Rutgers) 40-Yard Dash:  4.39 seconds 10-Yard Split:  1.50 seconds Vertical Jump:  36.5” Broad Jump:  11’2” (Best among CBs) Size:  5’11”, 175 lbs 📌 Scouting Report vs. Combine Performance: Longerbeam’s elite movement skills and quick burst showed up in testing. His 4.39-second 40-yard dash and 11’2” broad jump confirm his explosiveness and fluidity, making him a strong candidate for slot corner roles at the next level. His footwork and short-area quickness allow him to mirror receivers effectively, but his smaller frame (175 lbs) remains a concern against bigger receivers. 📈 Draft Stock Impact:  Longerbeam entered the NFL Combine as a late Day 3 prospect, but his NFL Combine performance could push into the late 3rd or early round 4 discussions. Teams looking for a feisty, athletic nickel corner will have him high on their boards. Malaki Starks (S, Georgia) 40-Yard Dash:  4.50 seconds 10-Yard Split:  1.51 seconds Vertical Jump:  33” Top Speed (Drills):  Fastest safety in five different position drills Size:  6’1”, 197 lbs 📌 Scouting Report vs. Combine Performance: Starks was already known for his versatility and high football IQ, and his Combine performance reinforced those traits. While his 4.50-second 40-yard dash was slightly below expectations, he showed elite movement skills in position drills, recording the fastest times of any safety in five separate drills. His short-area quickness, ability to track the ball, and closing speed were all evident in testing. 📈 Draft Stock Impact:  Starks remains a top-30 prospect and one of the best all-around safeties in the class. His performance didn’t drastically change his stock, it more or less solidified it. Mason Taylor (TE, LSU) Height/Weight:  6’5”, 251 lbs Arm Length:  32 1/4” Hand Size:  10” Key Drills:  Displayed elite hands  and fluid movement  in gauntlet drill Catch Rate:  98.2% in 2024 (1.8% drop rate) 📌 Scouting Report vs. Combine Performance: Taylor entered the Combine as a high-upside receiving tight end with natural pass-catching ability and NFL bloodlines. His performance in position drills validated his soft hands, tracking ability, and body control, making him one of the most polished route runners in this TE class. While his 40-yard dash time wasn't the focal point, his fluidity in drills, ability to extend for off-target throws, and crisp footwork stood out. 📈 Draft Stock Impact:  Taylor was projected as a Day 2 pick (Round 2-3) entering the Combine. I believe he solidified his stock.

Day 1 of the 2025 NFL Scouting Combine is in the books, and with several top prospects opting out of testing, new names had a chance to seize the spotlight in Indianapolis. Mason Graham (Michigan) and Abdul Carter (Penn State)—the top two players on our Football Scout 365 NFL Draft Big Board —chose not to participate in workouts, along with other highly regarded defenders like Kenneth Grant (Michigan) and Jalon Walker (Georgia). With these big names sitting out, James Pearce Jr., Shemar Stewart, Landon Jackson, and CJ West capitalized on the opportunity to make their case as early-round picks. Below, we break down how these standouts performed, how their Combine results align with their scouting profiles, and how their draft stock has shifted based on today’s testing. Day One 2025 NFL Combine: Defensive Linemen & Linebackers James Pearce Jr. (EDGE, Tennessee) 40-Yard Dash:  4.47 seconds (Fastest among DL) 10-Yard Split:  1.56 seconds Vertical Jump:  31” Broad Jump:  10’3” Size:  6’5”, 245 lbs 📌 Scouting Report vs. Combine Performance: Pearce entered the Combine with questions about his bend and ability to consistently convert speed to power, but his elite 4.47-second 40-yard dash at 6’5”, 245 lbs reaffirmed his explosive get-off. His 1.56-second 10-yard split was among the best for edge rushers, emphasizing his ability to accelerate quickly off the line. His 31-inch vertical jump, however, was lower than expected, raising minor concerns about his lower-body explosiveness. 📈 Draft Stock Impact: Pearce’s stock had been slipping in recent weeks, with some teams viewing him as an early Round 2 prospect due to concerns about his flexibility and power at the point of attack. After today’s showing, he likely moved himself back into the top 20 conversation, where he had been projected earlier in the process. Shemar Stewart (EDGE, Texas A&M) 40-Yard Dash:  4.59 seconds 10-Yard Split:  1.58 seconds (2nd-best 265+ lb EDGE since 2010) Vertical Jump:  40” (Top 10 All-Time for EDGE) Broad Jump:  10’11” (Best among EDGE) Size:  6’5”, 267 lbs 📌 Scouting Report vs. Combine Performance: Stewart was already considered one of the most physically imposing prospects in this draft, but his testing numbers exceeded even the highest expectations. His 40-inch vertical and 10’11” broad jump place him among the best testers at his position in Combine history, comparable to Myles Garrett’s legendary workout. His 1.58-second 10-yard split ranks among the fastest ever recorded for an EDGE over 265 lbs, trailing only Nick Bosa (1.55s) in the last 15 years. 📈  Draft Stock Impact:  Already viewed as a top-20 lock on our draft board, and we have mocked him as a top-10 pick two separate times, Stewart solidified his standing today. His testing reinforced that he is one of the best athletic prospects in this class, and teams looking for a high-upside pass rusher will strongly consider him in the mid-first round range. Landon Jackson (EDGE, Arkansas) 40-Yard Dash:  4.68 seconds 10-Yard Split:  1.65 seconds Vertical Jump:  40.5” (Best among all DL) Broad Jump:  10’9” Size:  6’6”, 264 lbs 📌 Scouting Report vs. Combine Performance: Jackson's athletic ability had always been evident on film, but today’s performance put him firmly back on the radar as a first-round prospect. His 40.5-inch vertical jump is among the best ever for a defensive lineman, and his 10’9” broad jump confirms his elite lower-body power. While his 4.68-second 40-yard dash is solid for his size, his 1.65-second 10-yard split was slightly slower than other top edge rushers. 📈 Draft Stock Impact: Once viewed as a fringe first-rounder, Jackson may have worked his way back into late Round 1 discussions. His combination of length, motor, and elite explosion numbers could make him a fit for teams looking for a developmental but high-upside pass rusher at the back end of the first round. CJ West (DT, Indiana) 40-Yard Dash:  4.95 seconds 10-Yard Split:  1.73 seconds Vertical Jump:  33” Size:  6’1”, 316 lbs 📌 Scouting Report vs. Combine Performance: West turned heads with his rare speed for a 316-pound defensive tackle, becoming just the ninth DT since 2003 to run a sub-5.0-second 40-yard dash at 315+ lbs. His 33-inch vertical jump further demonstrated his athleticism, though his shorter arms (31.5”) and lack of length remain concerns for his ability to take on blockers at the next level. 📈 Draft Stock Impact: West was already viewed as a mid-Day 2 pick, and his testing today likely solidified that range. Teams needing a one-gap penetrating DT will see him as an early third-round option, with a chance to sneak into late Round 2 depending on team fit.